DF: Black Ops Cold War PS5 vs PC

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

14713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 14713 Posts

To sum it up you can't spot the difference in a $400 PS5 vs a $2000 PC without pausing the game and pulling out a magnifying glass.

THHBO

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

10298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 10298 Posts

Ooohhh... in before the PC crowd start making excuses. A first for me.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

29936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 29936 Posts

PS5 also has the controller advantage too. So we can throw in Lems in the ownage too.

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

14713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 14713 Posts

@SolidGame_basic said:

PS5 also has the controller advantage too. So we can throw in Lems in the ownage too.

Very true. Lems have even been trashing their new controller.

Avatar image for sakaixx
sakaiXx

10680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 5

#5 sakaiXx
Member since 2013 • 10680 Posts

Is that magic $499 3070 even exist?

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

33820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 33820 Posts

Well isn’t it up to the devs to push a game to do better on more capable hardware? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

14713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 14713 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

Well isn’t it up to the devs to push a game to do better on more capable hardware? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

DF doesn't even bother with the XSX now because it can't hang with PS5 or PC.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

47101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#8 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 47101 Posts

It is like a support group in here. πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

6963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 6963 Posts

The console been released for just 2 months and we're already getting graphical settings lower than the lowest available on pc LOL. What went wrong?

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

33820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 33820 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag: So all you can do is shitpost a bs reply to my post then? All righty then troll, gotchya. πŸ‘

Avatar image for goldenelementxl
GoldenElementXL

5254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 GoldenElementXL
Member since 2016 • 5254 Posts

β€œOn the AMD side of things, I found the RX 6800 XT's result to be off-pace - it has 72 compute units vs the 36 inside PlayStation 5, it's based on the same architecture, and clock speeds are broadly equivalent, yet it delivered just 29.4 per cent of extra performance.β€œ

RDNA2 is so silly. The 6800XT has twice the CUs and only offers a 29% bump over the PS5. This also kinda adds fuel to the fire regarding the Series X performance. The Series X has a hefty CU count advantage, but a 400MHz clock speed penalty compared to the PS5. Well now it’s all but confirmed the clock speed > CU count with this architecture. If a 36 CU advantage at the same clock speed only yields a 29% gain, how does a 16 CU advantage with a 400MHz disadvantage compare?

RDNA2 is looking SUPER suspect right now. The Xbox team better be on the phone looking for answers...

Avatar image for goldenelementxl
GoldenElementXL

5254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 GoldenElementXL
Member since 2016 • 5254 Posts

And that hippie from Gamer Nexus might wanna brush up his resume

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

49263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 49263 Posts

Once again it comes down to the price argument. Got anything else? No? OK bye.

Look I'm happy you're happy driving around a Honda Accord, I really am. But don't hate us if we want to drive a Corvette or Ferrari instead.

@SolidGame_basic said:

PS5 also has the controller advantage too. So we can throw in Lems in the ownage too.

So you're using a mouse and keyboard now?

...No?...

...Then no advantage. The rumble gimmick is cool, don't get me wrong, but I don't see how it is advantageous.

@Pedro said:

It is like a support group in here. πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

Stay strong, brother.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33699 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

Well isn’t it up to the devs to push a game to do better on more capable hardware? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Oh so now you are throwing the lazy dev excuse for PC?

If this comparison would be for the xbox you would be saying how great it is doing for sure.🀣

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33699 Posts

Near 3070 performance not bad for $400 vs a PC that obviously cost allot more.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

33820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 33820 Posts

@tormentos: Didn’t say that they were lazy, simply saying that the only thing this proves is that the devs didn’t push the PC version. Is that not an accurate conclusion to make? 😐

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

6963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 6963 Posts

@tormentos: Of course it will keep up with the 3070 when there are graphical settings lower than low 🀣

And this is just CoD we're talking about. What about an actual demanding game? And spoiler, the SSD won't help.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

14822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 14822 Posts

Medium / low and doesn't even run fixed 4k. Ew.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33699 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

@tormentos: Didn’t say that they were lazy, simply saying that the only thing this proves is that the devs didn’t push the PC version. Is that not an accurate conclusion to make? 😐

Thats not true watch the video, the PC version has higher setting in many things over the PS5 version, they version match as much as possible but PC was still doing a little more work still.

But for $400 dollars vs that PC is quite an achievement.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

47101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#20 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 47101 Posts

@tormentos said:

Near 3070 performance not bad for $400 vs a PC that obviously cost allot more.

Now Sony fannies think the PS5 is near RTX 3070 performance....

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

29936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 29936 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

Once again it comes down to the price argument. Got anything else? No? OK bye.

Look I'm happy you're happy driving around a Honda Accord, I really am. But don't hate us if we want to drive a Corvette or Ferrari instead.

@SolidGame_basic said:

PS5 also has the controller advantage too. So we can throw in Lems in the ownage too.

So you're using a mouse and keyboard now?

...No?...

...Then no advantage. The rumble gimmick is cool, don't get me wrong, but I don't see how it is advantageous.

@Pedro said:

It is like a support group in here. πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

Stay strong, brother.

Rumble gimmick? Shows how much you know about the PS5 controller πŸ˜„

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

47101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#22 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 47101 Posts

@SolidGame_basic said:

Rumble gimmick? Shows how much you know about the PS5 controller πŸ˜„

It is a gimmick. You are just in denial. πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

14713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 14713 Posts

I feel sorry for these jealous fanboys calling the crown jewel DualSense controller a gimmick just because they can't get their hands on one.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

33820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 33820 Posts

@tormentos: The PC has a whole range of configurations and performance levels. The PC version can very much outperform any console version if the devs push it hard enough. Again is what I’m saying inaccurate? 😐

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

47101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#25 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 47101 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag said:

I feel sorry for these jealous fanboys calling the crown jewel DualSense controller a gimmick just because they can't get their hands on one.

Funny, I am calling it a gimmick and I have one. πŸ˜‚

Quick, find another defense. 🀣

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

49263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 49263 Posts
@Pedro said:
@SolidGame_basic said:

Rumble gimmick? Shows how much you know about the PS5 controller πŸ˜„

It is a gimmick. You are just in denial. πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

*sigh*

fine, fine...."haptic feedback" gimmick.

*it does rumble though, right?

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

33820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 33820 Posts

@Pedro: Sony Defense Force, activate! πŸ˜…

Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11207 Posts

lol it's running at dynamic 4k with most settings at medium, some lower than low or off with no RT ambient occlusion and RT shadows missing in some scenes.So the PC can't even completely mimmick PS5 settings to get a complete accurate comparison. Did you cows not pay attention to the part where digital foundry said they weren't the using the RTX cards to their full strength by having DLSS enabled? The RTX 2070 Super which was performing worse than the PS5 began to outperform it by 10 fps in DLSS quality mode. Now what do you think an RTX 3070 is going to do with DLSS when it already outperforms it without it.

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

6963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 6963 Posts

I am beginning to think our ps5 is very underpowered. Thanks god the SSD will save the day, tho.

Avatar image for jasonofa36
JasonOfA36

2750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 JasonOfA36
Member since 2016 • 2750 Posts

Did you really claim ownage on Call of Duty? Call of Duty? LMFAO

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

10683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 10683 Posts

Alex also said the PS5 is running effects at a quarter resolution which has a rather large impact on performance whereas the PC can’t drop that low.

He stresses that it’s not a 1:1 comparison and that he’ll try to test how much performance is lost on PC as a result.

PS5 is probably 2070S level overall with all settings matched.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

10683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 10683 Posts
@goldenelementxl said:

β€œOn the AMD side of things, I found the RX 6800 XT's result to be off-pace - it has 72 compute units vs the 36 inside PlayStation 5, it's based on the same architecture, and clock speeds are broadly equivalent, yet it delivered just 29.4 per cent of extra performance.β€œ

RDNA2 is so silly. The 6800XT has twice the CUs and only offers a 29% bump over the PS5. This also kinda adds fuel to the fire regarding the Series X performance. The Series X has a hefty CU count advantage, but a 400MHz clock speed penalty compared to the PS5. Well now it’s all but confirmed the clock speed > CU count with this architecture. If a 36 CU advantage at the same clock speed only yields a 29% gain, how does a 16 CU advantage with a 400MHz disadvantage compare?

RDNA2 is looking SUPER suspect right now. The Xbox team better be on the phone looking for answers...

That could explain the disparity. Those are bandwidth-heavy effects that run at a quarter resolution on PS5. PC can't go below.

Avatar image for phlop_spencer
Phlop_Spencer

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#33 Phlop_Spencer
Member since 2020 • 1476 Posts

I guess they keep comparing pc to PS5 instead of the weakboxSX because they don’t want any more death threats from the psycho Xbox fannies after exposing how much shittier it is.

Avatar image for phlop_spencer
Phlop_Spencer

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#34 Phlop_Spencer
Member since 2020 • 1476 Posts

@Juub1990: I wonder how shitty the Xbox would do in comparison with its missing smoke, missing muzzle flashes and low quality shadows ?

Avatar image for sheevpalpamemes
SheevPalpamemes

845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#35 SheevPalpamemes
Member since 2020 • 845 Posts

@phlop_spencer said:

@Juub1990: I wonder how shitty the Xbox would do in comparison with its missing smoke, missing muzzle flashes and low quality shadows ?

PS5 is the premium call of duty experience.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

13482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 154

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 13482 Posts

So, the PS5 is running particles at 25% resolution of PC and DLSS is not even being used for better performance on PC.

There are no bragging rights to be had vs. PC.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

36428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 36428 Posts

Honestly I love both the look and performance of the last two COD games.

Avatar image for remiks00
remiks00

4103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By remiks00
Member since 2006 • 4103 Posts
@Pedro said:

It is like a support group in here. πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

Lol, facts. Knew exactly how this thread would end up with the usual cow suspects.πŸ˜‚

@Archangel3371 said:

@Pedro: Sony Defense Force, activate! πŸ˜…

Avatar image for bluestars
Bluestars

2354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#39 Bluestars  Online
Member since 2019 • 2354 Posts

i’ll wait till they compare the elite console and pc,not this 9.2 tinyflops shit

hah

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33699 Posts

@hardwenzen said:

@tormentos: Of course it will keep up with the 3070 when there are graphical settings lower than low 🀣

And this is just CoD we're talking about. What about an actual demanding game? And spoiler, the SSD won't help.

It doesn't keep up is actually slower than a 3070, i never claimed it keep up, i say NEAR which is true.

Meanwhile they don't even lose their time testing your 40% stronger xbox series X.

@Pedro said:

Now Sony fannies think the PS5 is near RTX 3070 performance....

Well from this comparison it is, now define NEAR.

@Archangel3371 said:

@tormentos: The PC has a whole range of configurations and performance levels. The PC version can very much outperform any console version if the devs push it hard enough. Again is what I’m saying inaccurate? 😐

No you know what you did and it backfire.πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33699 Posts

@hardwenzen said:

I am beginning to think our ps5 is very underpowered. Thanks god the SSD will save the day, tho.

Your 40% stronger series X got ignore by DF they skip it in favor of the better performing console.πŸ˜‚

I am sure the new dev kit will save you.

But but but 40%..

@SolidGame_basic said:

Rumble gimmick? Shows how much you know about the PS5 controller πŸ˜„

Ignore him he is mad because DF didn't even care about the xbox and went straight for the PS5 for making the comparison, so much of the strongest console ever make.🀣

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

6963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 6963 Posts

@tormentos: You're wrong on so many levels

The console is running graphical settings lower than the lowest available on the pc, just like the ps4 pro, and you're talking about the series X 🀣

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33699 Posts

@hardwenzen said:

@tormentos: You're wrong on so many levels

The console is running graphical settings lower than the lowest available on the pc, just like the ps4 pro, and you're talking about the series X 🀣

Regardless, at the top end, an RTX 3090 delivers an 81.2 per cent boost to performance in this segment at equivalent settings, while RTX 3070 is just 8.6 per cent faster. An RTX 2070 Super can't match PlayStation 5 - in fact, it's 20 per cent slower.

No Caption Provided

On the AMD side of things, I found the RX 6800 XT's result to be off-pace - it has 72 compute units vs the 36 inside PlayStation 5, it's based on the same architecture, and clock speeds are broadly equivalent, yet it delivered just 29.4 per cent of extra performance.

And this explain why your xbox series X perform worse..🀣

Oh that fast and narrow approach sure worked for sony, wonder how MS feel about this.

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

6963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 6963 Posts

@tormentos said:
@hardwenzen said:

@tormentos: You're wrong on so many levels

The console is running graphical settings lower than the lowest available on the pc, just like the ps4 pro, and you're talking about the series X 🀣

Regardless, at the top end, an RTX 3090 delivers an 81.2 per cent boost to performance in this segment at equivalent settings, while RTX 3070 is just 8.6 per cent faster. An RTX 2070 Super can't match PlayStation 5 - in fact, it's 20 per cent slower.

On the AMD side of things, I found the RX 6800 XT's result to be off-pace - it has 72 compute units vs the 36 inside PlayStation 5, it's based on the same architecture, and clock speeds are broadly equivalent, yet it delivered just 29.4 per cent of extra performance.

And this explain why your xbox series X perform worse..🀣

Oh that fast and narrow approach sure worked for sony, wonder how MS feel about this.

My Xbox? You're trying too hard. Here's a video for you

Loading Video...
Avatar image for warmblur
warmblur

6868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#45  Edited By warmblur
Member since 2017 • 6868 Posts

Who the hell would want to play a FPS with a gamepad? M/KB will always be better. Also who the hell cares about the COD series it's responsible for the dumbing down of the FPS genre along with Halo.

Avatar image for pc_rocks
PC_Rocks

5159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#46 PC_Rocks
Member since 2018 • 5159 Posts

LMAO @ cows who think their precious toy is an 3070 equivalent while conveniently leaving out the low than lowest on PC and not even 4K.

In reality with the same effects and RT it's performing worse than 2060.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

47101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#47 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 47101 Posts

Like clock work, Sony fannies deflect to Xbox.πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

"Bu buh but Xbox"

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

37710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 37710 Posts

Poo TC. lol :P

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

29936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 29936 Posts

Herms be getting worked up over a game most of them probably don't even play and couldn't tell the difference even if it was right in front of them πŸ˜€

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33699 Posts

@hardwenzen said:

My Xbox? You're trying too hard. Here's a video for you

Sorry bro no you lived by the sword you die by it.πŸ˜‚

To late for backtracking..

@pc_rocks said:

LMAO @ cows who think their precious toy is an 3070 equivalent while conveniently leaving out the low than lowest on PC and not even 4K.

In reality with the same effects and RT it's performing worse than 2060.

Regardless, at the top end, an RTX 3090 delivers an 81.2 per cent boost to performance in this segment at equivalent settings, while RTX 3070 is just 8.6 per cent faster. An RTX 2070 Super can't match PlayStation 5 - in fact, it's 20 per cent slower.

DF also make pretty clear the settings are not an exact match but the closes they could get.

It's an interesting exercise, but in this case mostly an academic one in several respects. Beyond the issue we have in precisely matching settings and where we can't access dynamic resolution scaling on PC (more's the pity!) it's not entirely representative of actual use-case scenarios.

In AC Valhalla a 2070 super wasn't a match for the PS5 either it was much slower as well, so for $400 dollars you simply can't ask more and you can't deliver better results on PC for that price.

Take into account than in 2013 a 7850 was beating the PS4 without much effort, and that was lower than mid range back then.

Either way near 3070 is ok by 8% or 40% thats one good ass GPU.

@Pedro said:

Like clock work, Sony fannies deflect to Xbox.πŸ˜‚πŸ€£

"Bu buh but Xbox"

Define near.🀣