[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] Sure, if you think so, I'm sorry. The entire industry treats NeoGAF as a source. Most gaming websites cite NeoGAF as their source most of the times. Developers are on NeoGAF. GAF has leaked multiple games and products before their existence countless times in the past. Everyone treats GAF as legitimate. If you don't want to, that's all right. You just have to wait a little over two weeks for official confirmation, which is perfectly fine.charizard1605
GS is broken, so I'll keep this short. It's not a confirmation. I would never quote Neogaf and say it's an accurate source. No one would do that here, but perhaps you. I would quote Neogaf and say odds are on the money. You are just spouting about things I knew about Neogaf long before. I was at Neogaf beforeDenis Dyack was banned. Again, not a confirmation. I've seen stuff completely wrong posted there and stuff completely right. You are overstating that forum, as always. If I were a betting man, I would say this is on the money, BUT I would NEVER state this is a CONFIRMATION as it is not.
We have no idea what Nintendo will implement in the final model of the Wii U, only Nintendo can give this confirmation. We can know that while Two Table's can be supported, Nintendo may decide to not go that route last minute...We just DO NOT KNOW.
Neogaf is NOT a confirmation, sorry. It's definitely a fine source, but you are overstating the forum.
Like I said, you want to wait two weeks for official confirmation, that is fine, and understandable. On the whole, though, this comes from a very trustworthy source on GAF who has broken several things about Nintendo is advance, so it can be treated as confirmation. If you don't want to treat it as that, that's fine.The thing is I want this to be true, but I'm very moral, and follow strict ethics since my newspaper days. Especially when it comes to sources and with my byline.
Log in to comment