"COD WW2 One X is a generational difference compared to The One"

http://gearnuke.com/cod-wwii-xbox-one-x-resolution/

Call of Duty: WWII appears to be one of these games and its uses this technique to reach its target of native 4K on Xbox One X but just like the PS4 Pro, it uses dynamic resolution scaling with the game. The difference here is that the PS4 Pro verison of the game never manages to hit 4K while the Xbox One X version can reach this target. This was confirmed in an analyze by VG Tech.

Even if we compare the lowest point of the resolution, the PS4 Pro version can hit 960×2160 on the low end and 2640×2160 on the high-end of the resolution, compared to the Xbox One X, which has a resolution ranging from 1920×2160 to 3840×2160, and it is already a massive leap while maintaining a steady frame rate.

The difference between the PS4 Pro and Xbox One is already big enough, but if we go with the Xbox One comparison, it is like a generation difference for users. The Xbox One version also uses dynamic scaling but peaks out at 900p which seems rather ridiculous next to the 4K target for Xbox One X. The game also offers better frame rate on the Xbox One X compared to the base Xbox One and without less screen tearing to boot.

Call of Duty: WWII is undoubtedly best played on the Xbox One X even if you own a PS4 Pro. The controller was already well suited for shooters but the release of the Xbox One X has made it the definitive console version.

One X stomping out the competition for best console version.

Love it.

Posted a redundant response to your own garbage thread.

The most recently released console is more powerful? No shit, so is the most recently released anything.

What has improved in the CoD franchise this decade:

• Graphics

It’s hard to imagine the X1X not being the better version on a multiplat game.

How would that even be accomplished unless the dev did so on purpose?

It’s got a better hardware inside.

You clearly don't kbow what a generational jump is TC :p

Many claimed that PS4 and X1 weren't powerful enough, yet look at Battlefield games, for example. They went from 30fps with 24 players online last gen to 60fps with 64 players online and much better graphics on current gen.

That's a game changing generational leap.

So a game series that's looked and felt a gen behind for awhile now finally feels current gen worthy...great?

@PAL360: Not my wording. I do find it interesting that a midgen refresh is causing so much saltiness and hate though.

so what does that make PC?

So cod on the One X is 4K/60 ?

If so that is impressive.

@R4gn4r0k: it uses a dynamic scaler that goes from 1430x2160 all the way up to 4k. It does tend to drop frames here and there but mostly in cutscenes. It also uses a temporal reconstruction technique that uses previous frame data to build the new one. So even if it reaches 4K, it's not really native.

Funny how TC started the quote after this paragraph:

"COD WWII is an interesting case on the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X. The game uses a temporal reconstruction technique for its resolution that results in the image being rendered with the help of previous frames displayed on screen. This is not a new technique per se but it hasn’t been used in many games aside from the ones that require the developer to reach their 60 fps target."

Why omit that part? I thought you guys were all for full details? Maybe it's because even if the Xbox hits a dynamically scaled 4K output, rhe internally rendered image isn't native 4K anyway.

@Zero_epyon: If the thread was about 4K then maybe. Also the reso is detailed in my quote. Cry more and get back in your biased sticky.

lol wut? The whole thread is about resolution and comparing the pro's inability to scale to 4K vs the X's. Don't you think it's important to note that neither versions actually hit 4K natively because of the reconstruction technique it uses?

@Zero_epyon: Sounds like you can start a new thread about the shortcomings of the ProFauxK.

This thread is talking about how there is a generational difference between the One and the X. Now go back to your thread and continue to downplay The Mighty One X.

@kuu2: that’s rich considering you are probably one of the most biased people here.

@sirk1264: Yep and openly admit it. Cow_Epyon not so much.

At what point is "mid gen upgrade" just marketing speak for "this is a new console after a few years"?

Why when you already did that in this thread? You lead in with the paragraph comparing X to Pro after ignoring the detail about the reconstruction technique. Not trying to downplay the X as it hands in better resolution quality than the pro (which is expected). But also not trying to hide the fact that it doesn't do native 4K either like the article snippet implies.

@xantufrog: it's really the first generation something like this has happened. We have always had midgen refresh but nothing to this degree in the X and Pro.

Meh, I don't like temporal recustruction.

Quantum break used that, and things started looking blurry during intense movement.

Intense movement is something you are bound to do in a shooter :/

It's no secret that I preferred PS this gen. It's also no secret that I own an Xbox One S and a gaming PC that owns both consoles. But funny enough, I heard you were a fakeboy this whole time. But I'll play along because it's fun watching you cry all the time.

That was because they used 4 720p images to do the reconstruction. I don't know how many frames COD uses and what resolution they're rendered at, but it seems to be a higher quality than QB.

cool, now resolution bumps are generational leaps....

@Zero_epyon: Says the Cow who came into the thread crying about what was in said thread. LOL..................

Wrong again. Just pointing out what you missed. I though you of all people would appreciate that.

Cool, so what gen is PC on then? Since apparently every time we get a simple texture quality/resolution bump, it's a new gen.

I can't seem to find the option for this resolution scaling technology I've heard so much about though. Is it somewhere in the Nvidia control panel??

I bet we'll be seeing a few half-arsed PS4 Pros showing up on eBay soon...

Just saw the Wolfenstein comparison on DF too, X peaks at 2160p and Pro only 1440p. LOL.

Yeah that's a huge jump while maintaining the same performance and visual quality.

I believe it. Im playing it on og bone, the rez is god awful im not sure what it is really but wow it sucks. My guess is 720p tops.

Reconstructed 900p

@hrt_rulz01: Yeah well. I am still getting over all this 4K goodness.

So a thread comparing the X version to the One version and still cows have a meltdown?

@RR360DD: They are a fragile bunch.

I guess PC is 2 gens ahead lol.

Well considering how ****** weak the Xbone is, that's not that surprising.

Sony exclusives disagree with you.

kuu still trying to justify his console purchase. And the arguments that ensue about console graphics. You console guys are funny.

Wow, didn't expect the BoneX to widen the gap that far on this game.

Well here we go. I knew all those lol 900p Xbone threads were going to come full circle eventually.

Funny how the usual suspects have completely shifted view points though. Now lems are saying how important resolution is and PlayStation gamers are downplaying the situation. System Wars Gold I say.

@kuu2:

PS4 Pro's pixel count ranged from 2,073,600 to 5,702,400 pixels

X1X's pixel count ranged from 4,147,200 to 8,294,400 pixels

PS4 Pro's resolution ranged from 960×2160 to 2640×2160

X1X's resolution ranged from 1920×2160 to 3840×2160

Another none native 4k game on the only 'true 4k' console.

@scatteh316: it hits native 4k many times? Wut

Adaptive 4k can still hit native.

Then it's not native...... Native stays native.... regardless of the rendering load.

Double standards FTW!!!

@scatteh316: how is it double standard? Im technically correct

Dynamic Scaling is not native 4K. Xbox Super Fanatics are silly with nonstop hypocrisy.

Sony exclusives don't appeal to everyone :)

Call me when it's a game I care about

Still not native anyway. It uses a reconstruction technique to render the image.

Well yeah, but it still can max out at 4k native.

I still don't see how this is a counter argument, it shits all over the Pro yet cows bring up this stupid shit (not you, other cows)

Cows need to stop hiding behind their WINDOWS PCs and just stop moving goal posts, the XB1X is stronger than any playstation system, and that's a fact.

Still a shitty game

Still in denial ofcourse and crying because the PoS4Pro wasn't worth the 400 bucks

Tbh Ww2 doesn't look that good on the original Xbox one so this is impressive.