Pretty much the same , only one area on the PS5 version drops under 50 FPS at 1:34 / 1:42
@regnaston: Yeah there is a part where the XSX drops too ,but is more often on PS5... I don't agree that looks last gen.. this video quality is not the best...game looks really good and much better looking than Halo infinite 😂
@regnaston: Yeah there is a part where the XSX drops too ,but is more often on PS5... I don't agree that looks last gen.. this video quality is not the best...game looks really good and much better looking than Halo infinite 😂
I go by how the faces look for most of my "last gen" comments. The only face that wowed me was Regan's face the other character (a young Robert Redford) looks meh to me as do the other faces
Not one cow in this thread yet, it seems they're all hiding or should i say celebrating in the AC thread lol.
This is why these comparisons are dumb.
@i_p_daily:
You should be tagging cows like tormy, that chicken dude, solidgamebasic etc, they're you're target audience here, not me.
Weren't next generation consoles supposed to be locked 60 or higher? What's this dips into the 40s bs? "next gen", bless.
@tormentos: Please find a post where I say 40% advantage 👀 if I use the TFLOP performance is only 10% or max 15% advantage.
Here you go @Sagemode87 now what do you say to this, have at it cow.
Take Pedro's pick not only is the PS5 version at 40fps but look at the detail of the gun on the SeX version compared to the PS5 version.
See i don't give a shit as CoD sucks, but when you run your mouth sometimes you need to eat crow.
@i_p_daily: cutscenes only bruh. Will wait for DF comparison here. Imagine quality looked better on PS5 just like Valhalla. Not sure what's going on with XSX textures. Valhalla being better on PS5 must've struck a nerve.
@i_p_daily: cutscenes only bruh. Will wait for DF comparison here. Imagine quality looked better on PS5 just like Valhalla. Not sure what's going on with XSX textures. Valhalla being better on PS5 must've struck a nerve.
You couldn't strike a nerve, i just wanted to see your DC and as usual it sucks lol.
Weren't next generation consoles supposed to be locked 60 or higher? What's this dips into the 40s bs? "next gen", bless.
its impossible right now to do that. re build game engines,os and hardware.
i seen no game ever claim that for legal reasons.
You tried :
Most powerful with only full RDNA 2, consistent clocks......oh well.
How dumb the Xbox fans are :
In reality (from naked eye), how much of difference can we expect from these two Next-Gen Consoles?
— Josh (@LiquidTitan) March 26, 2020
•PS5: 10.3TF (SmartShift), 36CUs at
2.23Ghz. Ultra-Fast SSD (Twice the
Speed of XSX)
•XSX: 12.1TF (Locked), 52CUs at
1.82Ghz, Most Powerful Console
(Mature Talk) 🤔
lol it’s math, minimum of 40to50 frames per second on GPU Alone. In addition to better RT
— DEALER (@Dealer_Gaming) March 26, 2020
This Delta alone is huge, can be put into extra effects, resolution, frames, so much more.
That’s OK though, it should be $100 more expensive As I’ve always been saying from the beginning
Still looking for the 40%...
It would be a rough gen for Xbox fans. Full power 12 RDNA 2 only and what not. LOL. This will be a rough gen for Xbox fans. PS4 already at launch showed power advantage. XSX can't even if power difference is smaller, but Xbox fans believe it's bigger difference for some reason. LOL Anyway, post above too.
Still looking for the 40%...
Still looking for the 68%.
From this poor comparison my estimates are correct.
While yours a way off.
64+68% = 107.52
Pretty easy math i have one even better.
65+75% = 113.75
So is up to 75% faster on the PS5 side on performance mode please prove me wrong.🤣
So the PS5 is ""Up to 75% faster"" on performance mode.😎
@tormentos: Please find a post where I say 40% advantage 👀 if I use the TFLOP performance is only 10% or max 15% advantage.
That wasn't directed at you nor i claimed you say that here.
Still looking for the 40%...
Still looking for the 68%.
From this poor comparison my estimates are correct.
While yours a way off.
64+68% = 107.52
Pretty easy math i have one even better.
65+75% = 113.75
So is up to 75% faster on the PS5 side on performance mode please prove me wrong.🤣
So the PS5 is ""Up to 75% faster"" on performance mode.😎
@tormentos: Please find a post where I say 40% advantage 👀 if I use the TFLOP performance is only 10% or max 15% advantage.
That wasn't directed at you nor i claimed you say that here.
So the PS5 is faster than the series X by 75% now not 68%
Classic
That secret sauce must be very powerful and very secret.
@mowgly1: Not sure what is happening in that video. All the drops are during kill cams. Both systems keep it pretty steady at 120 during gameplay. If the gameplay is 120 then the kill cams not speaks of a problem with the code.
PS5 during gameplay actually drops lower than the XSX (around 113fps vs 120 IIRC)
@mowgly1:
HAHA do you realize the frame drops happened during KILLCAM / respawning ? not during gameplay ? If I was going to cherry pic captures I did use this one
You see that the drops are during killcam / respawning? But since that guy got kill more playing the xsx version, you can't tell how severe it is on PS5, during gameplay both are steady with minimum drops.
I really don't see any issues here. If you're a PS5 owner such as myself, and you're looking for stable frames, simply look at the ground or sky (corner of a room is an excellent choice as well btw). You will get your 120fps easily. Otherwise it is very challenging for this kind of hardware to achieve stable frames.
Ps5 is offline in the videos. X is playing online. Big difference. The X will play 99 % of third party better.
@greygoose12: Yeah many people are calling out the guy making the 120FPS video comparison , he is using bots and offline mode on PS5 vs the Online mode on XSX.. like I noticed the game drops frames on killcam and respawning after that picks up again to steady 120fps with really minor drops .
@regnaston: Not only that , the frame drops only happen during KILLCAM and respawning, after that is steady 120 with minor drops.. the same thing happens on PS5 even with the bots.. but I wonder why that guy used the offline mode to compare it to the online mode on XSX...
Guys, why would you chose to reference a guy who had been caught giving the ps5 version of Cold War an advantage? Or makes your argument look very weak abd desperate, while shattering your credibility.
On topic: it looks like you can't go wrong with either next-generation console with CW. To me the only reason why ps5 gets the nod for purchase right now is only because if the launch library vs the XSX.
So it turns out the video @mowgly1 posted with the frame rate drops on the XSX with COD multiplayer the test was not comparing apples to apples
PS5 was playing locally using BOTS and the XSX was playing online vs real players
Yeah compare this one excuse machine.
I think the series X has a cpu problem maybe it has to handle additional process that the PS5 has hardware for or simple the CPU is having a hard time feeding the xbox series X 12TF.
At 60FPS both the PS5 and xbox version are basically lock, at 120FPS the PS5 pulls ahead exactly like on DMC5.
So it turns out the video @mowgly1 posted with the frame rate drops on the XSX with COD multiplayer the test was not comparing apples to apples
PS5 was playing locally using BOTS and the XSX was playing online vs real players
Yeah compare this one excuse machine.
I think the series X has a cpu problem maybe it has to handle additional process that the PS5 has hardware for or simple the CPU is having a hard time feeding the xbox series X 12TF.
At 60FPS both the PS5 and xbox version are basically lock, at 120FPS the PS5 pulls ahead exactly like on DMC5.
Yes, it's looking more likely that the XSX has a bottleneck somewhere. Probably both CPU-related and GPU-related, as the games are also equal during the ray-traced 60 FPS mode when XSX has 20% TF advantage. I think real-world GPU power is equal between PS5 and XSX, but PS5 has a massive CPU advantage.
Yes, it's looking more likely that the XSX has a bottleneck somewhere. Probably both CPU-related and GPU-related, as the games are also equal during the ray-traced 60 FPS mode when XSX has 20% TF advantage.
Probably.
But but but the PS5 is 9.2TF the CPU drops to 2.8ghz the series X will destroy it.
Why is it only the advantage at lower resolution with high FPS but at higher resolutions at 60fps the series X is more solid ? That video at higher resolution the PS5 version drops frames more often.
Why is it only the advantage at lower resolution with high FPS but at higher resolutions at 60fps the series X is more solid ? That video at higher resolution the PS5 version drops frames more often.
Probably poor optimization on the PS5 version. The person mentioned dips in the PS5 for certain scenes that happened randomly. Sometimes the dips don't happen, sometimes they do. And honestly, even with the dips look at the numbers. You're talking about 5 frames where it dipped under 60 on PS5 vs 4 on the XSX. It's not even worth talking about.
Honestly, I'm pretty excited about how the PS5 will develop throughout this gen. 3rd party devs aren't even utilizing PS5's superior I/O and the geometry engine and they're still beat XSX. They probably gave XSX all the optimizations they can to help it keep up with the PS5.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment