Battlefront II on Xbox One X: 4K? 60FPS?

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44056 Posts

@Orchid87 said:

@ronvalencia: you still believe XBX GPU matches 1070? Good luck with that.

No luck really needed since It was DF themselves that first made the comparison to the 1070 so me thinks he's in good company. :P

Avatar image for pinkanimal
PinkAnimal

2380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#52 PinkAnimal
Member since 2017 • 2380 Posts

@SecretPolice said:
@Orchid87 said:

@ronvalencia: you still believe XBX GPU matches 1070? Good luck with that.

No luck really needed since It was DF themselves that first made the comparison to the 1070 so me thinks he's in good company. :P

DF made that claim based on a tech demo running on a dev kit that they saw, not even analyzed. When they actually had a closer look they updated their estimations to something way more conservative. But lemmings like you and ron love to live in perpetual delusional denial.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44056 Posts

@pinkanimal said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Orchid87 said:

@ronvalencia: you still believe XBX GPU matches 1070? Good luck with that.

No luck really needed since It was DF themselves that first made the comparison to the 1070 so me thinks he's in good company. :P

DF made that claim based on a tech demo running on a dev kit that they saw, not even analyzed. When they actually had a closer look they updated their estimations to something way more conservative. But lemmings like you and ron love to live in perpetual delusional denial.

lolol

:P

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

@SecretPolice said:
@pinkanimal said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Orchid87 said:

@ronvalencia: you still believe XBX GPU matches 1070? Good luck with that.

No luck really needed since It was DF themselves that first made the comparison to the 1070 so me thinks he's in good company. :P

DF made that claim based on a tech demo running on a dev kit that they saw, not even analyzed. When they actually had a closer look they updated their estimations to something way more conservative. But lemmings like you and ron love to live in perpetual delusional denial.

lolol

:P

^^^ What happens when you're out of arguments

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44056 Posts

@Orchid87 said:
@SecretPolice said:
@pinkanimal said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Orchid87 said:

@ronvalencia: you still believe XBX GPU matches 1070? Good luck with that.

No luck really needed since It was DF themselves that first made the comparison to the 1070 so me thinks he's in good company. :P

DF made that claim based on a tech demo running on a dev kit that they saw, not even analyzed. When they actually had a closer look they updated their estimations to something way more conservative. But lemmings like you and ron love to live in perpetual delusional denial.

lolol

:P

^^^ What happens when you're out of arguments

^^^ What's said when you have no good argument to begin with. lol All shall be known in less than a couple months. :P

Avatar image for pinkanimal
PinkAnimal

2380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#56 PinkAnimal
Member since 2017 • 2380 Posts

@SecretPolice said:
@Orchid87 said:
@SecretPolice said:
@pinkanimal said:
@SecretPolice said:

No luck really needed since It was DF themselves that first made the comparison to the 1070 so me thinks he's in good company. :P

DF made that claim based on a tech demo running on a dev kit that they saw, not even analyzed. When they actually had a closer look they updated their estimations to something way more conservative. But lemmings like you and ron love to live in perpetual delusional denial.

lolol

:P

^^^ What happens when you're out of arguments

^^^ What's said when you have no good argument to begin with. lol All shall be known in less than a couple months. :P

In This Convo: a lem who doesn't understand how hardware works and thinks it's magical.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44056 Posts

@pinkanimal said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Orchid87 said:
@SecretPolice said:
@pinkanimal said:

DF made that claim based on a tech demo running on a dev kit that they saw, not even analyzed. When they actually had a closer look they updated their estimations to something way more conservative. But lemmings like you and ron love to live in perpetual delusional denial.

lolol

:P

^^^ What happens when you're out of arguments

^^^ What's said when you have no good argument to begin with. lol All shall be known in less than a couple months. :P

In This Convo: a lem who doesn't understand how hardware works and thinks it's magical.

No that's magical. :P

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@pinkanimal said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Orchid87 said:

@ronvalencia: you still believe XBX GPU matches 1070? Good luck with that.

No luck really needed since It was DF themselves that first made the comparison to the 1070 so me thinks he's in good company. :P

DF made that claim based on a tech demo running on a dev kit that they saw, not even analyzed. When they actually had a closer look they updated their estimations to something way more conservative. But lemmings like you and ron love to live in perpetual delusional denial.

The only delusional fool is you.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Orchid87 said:

@ronvalencia: you still believe XBX GPU matches 1070? Good luck with that.

For Battlefield 1, R9-390X is already close to GTX 1070 range GPU. Try again.

X1X's hardware changes made the above narrow gap to be applied at wider workload ranges.

Avatar image for scatteh316
scatteh316

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 scatteh316
Member since 2004 • 10273 Posts

@pinkanimal said:

Wrongbotlencia strikes again with spam while being completely wrong.

Especially as Quantum Break and Forza 7 have a GTX1060 kicking out the same results as Xbox X....

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8474 Posts

Lol lets all have a huge laugh and compare the Xbox One X compared to the PS4 Pro LMAO.

LOL Sony fans trying to attack the X1X when they know every single game shared between the two consoles will be better on X1X.

So go ahead and bash the X1X version because at the end of the day your version will always be worse.

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7970 Posts

I dont know why everyone is so hung up on resolution... The settings at which the game runs is the most important factor. Console don't run games at a default setting such as Ultra, High or even Medium they use mixtures of ALL settings including low or even completely disabling some features its why DF uses the term console settings. Not only that but BF games on consoles rarely meet their FPS target and usually hover around the 40-50FPS mark in MP.

So X1X at 4K/60FPS according to the Dev?... Basically means a mixture of low/medium and maybe some high settings and you will be lucky to hold a solid 50FPS during MP.

Its simple logic, if the X1X is running it on 4K/60FPS and the PC version is getting 60FPS on High with a GTX 1070 then the X1X version is not running it on High settings. There is no magical console optimisation, they just mess around with the settings till they hit their FPS target and rarely do they actually hit it with a solid lock.

Avatar image for deactivated-6079d224de716
deactivated-6079d224de716

2567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By deactivated-6079d224de716
Member since 2009 • 2567 Posts

@CanYouDiglt: did anyone claim that PS4 will run it at 4K 60 fps?

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@scatteh316 said:
@pinkanimal said:

Wrongbotlencia strikes again with spam while being completely wrong.

Especially as Quantum Break and Forza 7 have a GTX1060 kicking out the same results as Xbox X....

bullshit

Loading Video...

Particles Resolution: Quarter <------ 1920x1080p when the requested render resolution is 4K

Motion Blur: High (not set to Ultra)

Shadow Quality: High (not set to Ultra)

Procedural Quality: High (not set to Ultra)

Mirror Quality: High (not set to Ultra)

Wet Reflections: High (not set to Ultra)

MSAA Quality: OFF (not set to MSAA 4X or EQAA 4:8**) **On AMD GPUs, this feature fakes MSAA 8X with MSAA 4X level consumption.

Reflection Quality: High (not set to Ultra)

Avatar image for scatteh316
scatteh316

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 scatteh316
Member since 2004 • 10273 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@scatteh316 said:
@pinkanimal said:

Wrongbotlencia strikes again with spam while being completely wrong.

Especially as Quantum Break and Forza 7 have a GTX1060 kicking out the same results as Xbox X....

bullshit

Loading Video...

Particles Resolution: Quarter

Shadow Quality: High

MSAA Quality: OFF

Is it confirmed Xbox-X runs MAX settings across the board? I don't think it does... especially as it's been shown in screen shots that reflections aren't real as they don't match the track side details........ ;)

And was it you who claimed you would need a GTX 1070 to handle the wet tracks at 4k/60fps? That GTX 1060 seems to be doing a mighty fine job to me...... ;)

So all you've done is just prove my point.

Deal with it.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@scatteh316 said:
@ronvalencia said:
@scatteh316 said:
@pinkanimal said:

Wrongbotlencia strikes again with spam while being completely wrong.

Especially as Quantum Break and Forza 7 have a GTX1060 kicking out the same results as Xbox X....

bullshit

Loading Video...

Particles Resolution: Quarter

Shadow Quality: High

MSAA Quality: OFF

Is it confirmed Xbox-X runs MAX settings across the board? I don't think it does... especially as it's been shown in screen shots that reflections aren't real as they don't match the track side details........ ;)

And was it you who claimed you would need a GTX 1070 to handle the wet tracks at 4k/60fps? That GTX 1060 seems to be doing a mighty fine job to me...... ;)

So all you've done is just prove my point.

Deal with it.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2017-forza-motorsport-on-project-scorpio-the-full-story

Based from the above Project Scorpio's ForzaTech reveal Nurburgring wet track art work style, this comes from Forza Motosport 7 development build. The above art work style doesn't exist in Forza Motorsport 6.

The following screenshot shows Forza Motorspot 7 demo's Nurburgring wet track

"The crazy story here is that we've gone over our PC ultra settings and for everything that's GPU-related, we've been able to max it - and that's what we're running at, 88 per cent," says Tector, pointing to the utilisation data at the top of the screen. Right beneath it is theanti-aliasing setting - 4x, or rather 8:4x using the Radeon EQAA hardware AA.

GTX 1060's MSAA Quality: OFF (not set to MSAA 4X or EQAA 8:4x**) **On AMD GPUs, this feature fakes MSAA 8X with MSAA 4X level consumption.

Deal with it.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@pinkanimal said:

@ronvalencia: ronbot stop quoting me when you're wrong, i.e. always

The above GTX 1060 with 2088 Mhz OC (5.4 TFLOPS) and 97 percent GPU usage needs more power to avoid 46 fps dip i.e. my old GTX 980 Ti has a solid 60 fps with the same track scene.

Avatar image for scatteh316
scatteh316

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 scatteh316
Member since 2004 • 10273 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@scatteh316 said:
@ronvalencia said:
@scatteh316 said:
@pinkanimal said:

Wrongbotlencia strikes again with spam while being completely wrong.

Especially as Quantum Break and Forza 7 have a GTX1060 kicking out the same results as Xbox X....

bullshit

Particles Resolution: Quarter

Shadow Quality: High

MSAA Quality: OFF

Is it confirmed Xbox-X runs MAX settings across the board? I don't think it does... especially as it's been shown in screen shots that reflections aren't real as they don't match the track side details........ ;)

And was it you who claimed you would need a GTX 1070 to handle the wet tracks at 4k/60fps? That GTX 1060 seems to be doing a mighty fine job to me...... ;)

So all you've done is just prove my point.

Deal with it.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2017-forza-motorsport-on-project-scorpio-the-full-story

Based from the above Project Scorpio's ForzaTech reveal Nurburgring wet track art work style, this comes from Forza Motosport 7 development build. The above art work style doesn't exist in Forza Motorsport 6.

The following screenshot shows Forza Motorspot 7 demo's Nurburgring wet track

"The crazy story here is that we've gone over our PC ultra settings and for everything that's GPU-related, we've been able to max it - and that's what we're running at, 88 per cent," says Tector, pointing to the utilisation data at the top of the screen. Right beneath it is theanti-aliasing setting - 4x, or rather 8:4x using the Radeon EQAA hardware AA.

GTX 1060's MSAA Quality: OFF (not set to MSAA 4X or EQAA 8:4x**) **On AMD GPUs, this feature fakes MSAA 8X with MSAA 4X level consumption.

Deal with it.

It's no where near a GTX 1070......

So YOU deal with it.....