Not at all, at least for console owners. For me it went from SubHD/30fps/24players to 900p/60fps/64players + better graphics! I couldn't have asked for more.
Also the differences between the PS4 version and Xbox One version are minimal. Seriously, more minimal than the differences between early PS3/360 games. You get a bit more sharper colors and texture filters due to the Xbox One's upscaling (I think it's hardware) and you get a less aliased picture and less framerate drops on the PS4. Big freaken deal.
Give it a rest.
Nope, comparing minimal differences will continue an entire generation, just like the previous one.
@danabo: Not really. The differences are still minimal and you're ignoring the fact that the PS4 version is running a higher internal resolution.
Only problem with the PS4 version that I can see is that they are utilizing a software upscaler that washes out the picture just a bit. You get a smoother image but the texture detail is lost a bit
Also the differences between the PS4 version and Xbox One version are minimal. Seriously, more minimal than the differences between early PS3/360 games. You get a bit more sharper colors and texture filters due to the Xbox One's upscaling (I think it's hardware) and you get a less aliased picture and less framerate drops on the PS4. Big freaken deal.
Give it a rest.
What........????? You can't see the 1.8tflop difference, and GDDR25 effects, or maybe the 50% more power in those graphics? Your eyes must be biased.
Not at all, at least for console owners. The game went from SubHD/30fps/24players to 900p/60fps/64players + better graphics. Isn't it good enough?
Only ever played in the PC. So I suppose not much has changed. I do like the sea battles thing.
Plenty has changed, but they are all core refinements and additions to BF3. The levels are all far better than BF3's, there is more meaningful destruction and ways to change the map, the shooting has been refined quite a bit, the power weapons lead to some interesting mechanics, the graphics are overall upgraded, the interface is much improved, commander is back along with in-game VoiP and 5 man squads which make it much easier to play as a team, the squad perk system forces more teamwork on people, movement is better, and the whole game feels more complete.
It's not doing anything groundbreaking, but it's doing everything extremely well.
Not at all, at least for console owners. The game went from SubHD/30fps/24players to 900p/60fps/64players + better graphics. Isn't it good enough?
Only ever played in the PC. So I suppose not much has changed. I do like the sea battles thing.
Plenty has changed, but they are all core refinements and additions to BF3. The levels are all far better than BF3's, there is more meaningful destruction and ways to change the map, the shooting has been refined quite a bit, the power weapons lead to some interesting mechanics, the graphics are overall upgraded, the interface is much improved, commander is back along with in-game VoiP and 5 man squads which make it much easier to play as a team, the squad perk system forces more teamwork on people, movement is better, and the whole game feels more complete.
It's not doing anything groundbreaking, but it's doing everything extremely well.
Even the "New Metro" killwhore map is better. Although I'm not sure if everyone realizes that there is an outside portion to the map.
@danabo: Not really. The differences are still minimal and you're ignoring the fact that the PS4 version is running a higher internal resolution.
Only problem with the PS4 version that I can see is that they are utilizing a software upscaler that washes out the picture just a bit. You get a smoother image but the texture detail is lost a bit
Well, yes.
But this:
@kuu2 said:
@Wasdie said:
Also the differences between the PS4 version and Xbox One version are minimal. Seriously, more minimal than the differences between early PS3/360 games. You get a bit more sharper colors and texture filters due to the Xbox One's upscaling (I think it's hardware) and you get a less aliased picture and less framerate drops on the PS4. Big freaken deal.
Give it a rest.
What........????? You can't see the 1.8tflop difference, and GDDR25 effects, or maybe the 50% more power in those graphics? Your eyes must be biased.
With all the misinformation that was spread, I was expecting the differences to be far more substantial. Shame on me for believing Sony, again.
BATTLEFIELD COMPARISON FARCE!!! PS4 Co-op Campaign Footage vs X1 True Single player Campaign Footage
There's something I noticed in the top right of all the comparison images, gifs, videos etc. that were posted last night. In EVERY instance the PS4 is running a co-op version of the campaign whereas the Xbox One version is running single player.
Could this be the discrepancy some are noticing with the textures? What would the PS4 version look like if it was legit single player?! Why won't DF show the real 1P vs 1P comparisons!?
Evidence here... check out the top right corner it's clear that the PS4 version is running co-op:
here it appears the ps4 is running 5 player co-op and being compared to x1 single player:
.. WTF!? I could be wrong but this doesn't look good for the Xbox one if the comparisons are still favoring the PS4 version and it's not even true single player. Ouch.
(edit to say: sorry if this is off topic I made a thread but it got locked and I was told to post this here... :/)
900p better effects and framerate >>>> 720p with jaggies and frame drops.
if that's true, frame drops are no bueno for a game that is played mostly online
I noticed that the single player on my PC is more demanding than multiplayer. DICE upped the effects quite a bit in a lot of scenes in the single player. I guess they didn't care as much about framerate. The upside is they look absolutely fantastic.
BATTLEFIELD COMPARISON FARCE!!! PS4 Co-op Campaign Footage vs X1 True Single player Campaign Footage
There's something I noticed in the top right of all the comparison images, gifs, videos etc. that were posted last night. In EVERY instance the PS4 is running a co-op version of the campaign whereas the Xbox One version is running single player.
Could this be the discrepancy some are noticing with the textures? What would the PS4 version look like if it was legit single player?! Why won't DF show the real 1P vs 1P comparisons!?
Evidence here... check out the top right corner it's clear that the PS4 version is running co-op:
here it appears the ps4 is running 5 player co-op and being compared to x1 single player:
.. WTF!? I could be wrong but this doesn't look good for the Xbox one if the comparisons are still favoring the PS4 version and it's not even true single player. Ouch.
What I notice is that the Hud on the Xbox One version is much larger than the Hud on the PS4.
@danabo: Not really. The differences are still minimal and you're ignoring the fact that the PS4 version is running a higher internal resolution.
Only problem with the PS4 version that I can see is that they are utilizing a software upscaler that washes out the picture just a bit. You get a smoother image but the texture detail is lost a bit
Also the PS4 version it have a lot better FPS..........by 10-20 frames.
@danabo: lol you're still in denial. DF even mentioned the steadier framerate of the PS4 in their analysis. They mentioned the PS4 is always ahead by 2-4 fps on average and higher by a lot more in heavy sequences like the exploding canister in Baku.
Keep on damage controlling though, it's hilarious to watch you make a fool of yourself.
@danabo said:
@Gue1 said:
@lostrib said:
@I_can_haz said:
@danabo:
Your denial and butthurt is strong.
900p better effects and framerate >>>> 720p with jaggies and frame drops.
if that's true, frame drops are no bueno for a game that is played mostly online
and they are pretty crazy drops. PS4 version is always ahead by 10-20 frames.
Also the differences between the PS4 version and Xbox One version are minimal. Seriously, more minimal than the differences between early PS3/360 games. You get a bit more sharper colors and texture filters due to the Xbox One's upscaling (I think it's hardware) and you get a less aliased picture and less framerate drops on the PS4. Big freaken deal.
Give it a rest.
This... seems we're in for a repeat of this gen, once again, minimal differences where the "winners" are often subjective to the viewer... if they can even manage to spot the differences.
Also the differences between the PS4 version and Xbox One version are minimal. Seriously, more minimal than the differences between early PS3/360 games. You get a bit more sharper colors and texture filters due to the Xbox One's upscaling (I think it's hardware) and you get a less aliased picture and less framerate drops on the PS4. Big freaken deal.
Give it a rest.
This... seems we're in for a repeat of this gen, once again, minimal differences where the "winners" are often subjective to the viewer... if they can even manage to spot the differences.
Also the differences between the PS4 version and Xbox One version are minimal. Seriously, more minimal than the differences between early PS3/360 games. You get a bit more sharper colors and texture filters due to the Xbox One's upscaling (I think it's hardware) and you get a less aliased picture and less framerate drops on the PS4. Big freaken deal.
Give it a rest.
This... seems we're in for a repeat of this gen, once again, minimal differences where the "winners" are often subjective to the viewer... if they can even manage to spot the differences.
What I notice is that the Hud on the Xbox One version is much larger than the Hud on the PS4.
Why is that?
Resolution, the lower it is the larger the UI is (cos less pixels).
I bit the bullet and VPN'd BF4 so i could play it before release, just did a few campaign missions so far, Ultra graphics and its one ridiculously good looking game, captured some footage with Shadowplay should be uploaded soon.
Log in to comment