Battlefield 1 on GTX 1080 , Graphics Options Unveiled

Here's a cool footage of BF1 on GTX 1080 , it's closed alpha and looks really beautiful . .. it also may support DX12

========

http://www.dsogaming.com/news/battlefield-1-may-support-dx12-graphics-options-closed-alpha-build-unveiled/#more-89377

========

Well, this removes any doubt regarding it being the GFX king in just a few month.

Yay!

@the_master_race: Plan release date for B1 is October 21, 2016 i.e. about the same time as the rumoured Vega 10 release date.

That does look good as expected

Can't w8, though it doesn't matter rly if it's AMD or Nvidia ... battlefiled games always been optimized on PC

OMG 1080 GTX

Never mind the graphics, the game will suck

Looking forward to this game. Should have my GTX 1070 by then.

The game looks boring...

I wonder if it'll support Vulkan.

Well i max BF4 easy with over 60FPS in SP with occasional drops below 60 (massive explosions and mega effects in my face) and well over 75FPS in MP...

At 1080P BF1 will be awesome for everyone from what it looks like, 5K and 1080 is not lagging, 4K and it's very playable... DX12 also!

Looks good for a multiplayer, hardly graphics king tho. I expect SP to be better.

It destroys everything on consoles though.

getting my gtx 1080 monday 27th

How so? In what aspect of the graphics? And open world game like Horizon has bigger scale, more effects on screen, better lighting and higher quality assets like groups of half million poly thundermaw roamig around. I'll give you 60fps and 1440p tho, but that's something Neo can make up for at least 1080/60.

It looks boring as always. I'll stick to Call of Duty and Titanfall for my fps needs. Gears of War 4 when that comes to pc and hopefully Halo 6.

Why you mad? this is not objective opinion it's fact, since you are the know it all of graphics and technicality, in both ways BF1 on PC is above and beyond anything on a console.

Just answer my previous question please.

How is it a fact when BF1 doesn't even have volumetric lighting lol?

At over 60FPS and higher pixels than your calculator can handle?

VL at 30FPS (with FPS drops) in a 2x2ft room is hardly a feat.

$2.000 PC

$250 console

Wow... definite graphics king.

Sure, higher fps and res, just be more specific next time when you say destroy something, even though I consider 4k destroying 1080p, not 1440p. But the rest of its graphics aspects such as lighting, assets, shaders get destroyed by some console games adversely.

I'll fix it for you.

@uninspiredcup said:

In-game footage on PC.

Cutscene on console.

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

I'll fix it for you.

@uninspiredcup said:

In-game footage on PC.

Cutscene on console.

Nope, cut seamlessly without detail loss.

BF1 = blurry mess

LMAO

Truly, definitively a king..of no grass lol.

You and I just have very different taste on graphics king if anything:).

Oh btw it's a Neo shot, expect slight jaggy on the OG PS4.

.

@gpuking said:

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

Wow... definite graphics king.

Truly, definitively a king..of no grass lol.

You and I just have very different taste on graphics king if anything:).

Oh btw it's a Bullshot, expect way more jaggy and low res on the OG PS4 @11-29FPS.

FTFY

The footage doesn't make any sense. 1440P at 100% resolution scaling is...1440P. Not 5k or 4k or whatever.

@KHAndAnime: They changed the way resolution scale works. For absolutely no reason.

It's really not..... Still based on Frostbite engine...... An engine built last generation with last generation limitations....

@rekonmeister: dude don't bother. Check all his threads and you'll know what I mean.

Why don't you list some of the limitations as you seem to be so well versed in game engines?
How the hell can people still use Unreal Engine, I mean it's from 1998?

Low poly assets everywhere in the footage, not blowing away anything at this stage.

You are right, but that FPS and solid image quality... ohhhhhh

Personally I never cared about 60fps but image quality is pretty awesome indeed at 1440p or above.

I hope they change it back. My complaint might seem arbitrary, but I genuinely think that the change they implemented is not only arbitrary but it's also confusing as hell.

PC version is easily graphics king. It will finally beat W3/Battlfront.

Oh and lol at people responding seriously to @gpuking. Look at his post history. He thinks PS3 and PS4 topped PC graphics on a regular basis. We all know he's factually wrong, let him live in his imaginary world. Although I won't lie, it's funny to see him get absolutely curb stomped in every thread by just about everyone. Even though he's a huge graphics freak, 60 FPS wouldn't matter much to him - Because his system of choice can't do it.

I can't tell if his brain is literally screwed up, or if he's just trolling us all.

All Frostbite 3 BF games including SW:BF has volumetric lighting. What SW:BF didn't have was realtime GI.

@scatteh316: Frostbite Engine is one the most advanced and most optimized graphics engines on the market...Can you suggest which graphics engines are far better?

Dat 30 fps cinematic quality so good.

Unreal Engine 4

Lastest CryEngine

Anvil Next

Snow drop

Frost Bite is way behind most of the newer engines in terms of lighting tech and post processing, especially shaders due to the newer engines having much more realistic PBR systems.

Hahahaha. Anvil Next has a garbage physics system implemented, and it's incredibly unoptimized to boot.

I want a 1080 but just too much $$....might have to settle for the 1070 or see what AMD is up too.

It annoys me how much price gouging is going on with these cards right now.....get the damn cards out there at the damn price you said Nvidia.

@scatteh316: UR4 is certainly competitive, we haven't seen any major releases from the new Cryengine (5 I think) so I'll save my judgement. I'm not a developer, but I've heard the Cryengine is a pain to work with while not offering any advantages over UR4. I'm sure Cryengine is probably the most dominant with physics here even since the first Crysis.

Like Dragon mentioned Anvil Next is notorious for running poorly on even incredibly high end hardware. How many patches to fix Unity? Not to mention all of the draw issues.

Considering the amount of physics, effects, and scale poduced from Frostbite games with acceptable (BF) to stellar graphics (Battlefront) and running extremely well on an entire range of hardware I would say that Frostbite is more than competitive with these other engines. I've never noticed harsh pop-in at distances with even Battlefield 3 (Kaisaar Railroad for instance). Not to mention I have seen a multi-gpu scaling of almost 180% from it at times when forcing supersampling to 4k. Crysis 3 doesn't even scale that well.

Edit: Battlefront on consoles is gorgeous isn't it? And it runs fantastically.

@rekonmeister said:

@gpuking said:

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

Wow... definite graphics king.

Truly, definitively a king..of no grass lol.

You and I just have very different taste on graphics king if anything:).

Oh btw it's a Bullshot, expect way more jaggy and low res on the OG PS4 @11-29FPS.

FTFY

We all know how much the battlefields of World War 1 were famous for the endless rich flowing grasslands.

@gpuking said:

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

Wow... definite graphics king.

Truly, definitively a king..of no grass lol.

You and I just have very different taste on graphics king if anything:).

Oh btw it's a Neo shot, expect slight jaggy on the OG PS4.

Yikes, I hope that Horizon pic is alpha. It looks like dog doo doo.