http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnF6Dr8BhKA&feature=player_embedded
lets see how many people are actually smart enough to understand.
[spoiler] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8 [/spoiler]
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. Ninja-HippoI played it for the first time about a year ago, and I can safely say you're dead wrong. :P It impressed me more than any game had for a long time.
What a waste of their time. How about they release a Half Life 3 or Episode 3 already ? Anyone who wanted to actually player this game has probably already through either a console or bootcamp. Valve needs to get their priorities in order.
Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. Ninja-Hippo
While the gameplay is a little on the archaic side (even by 2004 standards), everything else still holds up quite well. Certainly better than 95% of the games coming out nowadays.
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. PBSnipes
While the gameplay is a little on the archaic side (even by 2004 standards), everything else still holds up quite well. Certainly better than 95% of the games coming out nowadays.
Archaic because it doesn't have recharging health or aiming down iron sights?[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. Guppy507I played it for the first time about a year ago, and I can safely say you're dead wrong. :P It impressed me more than any game had for a long time. I dunno, it's easily one of my favorite games of all time but i think it'd dated by today's standards. I took it for a whirl again when i got Orange Box for the 360 and i had to stop playing about half way through because it was ruining my memories of playing it at release on the PC. The graphics were pretty poor, the controls were clunky, the shooting robotic. I think it's just too late to be porting this game to other platforms and expecting it to compete with modern releases. It's six years old, after all.
Archaic because it doesn't have recharging health or aiming down iron sights?Guppy507
To a degree (back-tracking for health-packs has always sucked, as has keeping multiple saves because you weren't sure whether X% health would be enough to get to the next health-pack; and iron-sights is more immersive than the old "zoom the screen in on your reticule), but more so because it by-and-large feels like a 90's-era corridor crawler.
Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. Ninja-HippoIts not old at all. It holds up pretty well compared to todays shooters.
[QUOTE="Guppy507"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. Ninja-HippoI played it for the first time about a year ago, and I can safely say you're dead wrong. :P It impressed me more than any game had for a long time. I dunno, it's easily one of my favorite games of all time but i think it'd dated by today's standards. I took it for a whirl again when i got Orange Box for the 360 and i had to stop playing about half way through because it was ruining my memories of playing it at release on the PC. The graphics were pretty poor, the controls were clunky, the shooting robotic. I think it's just too late to be porting this game to other platforms and expecting it to compete with modern releases. It's six years old, after all.
I think the graphics hold up surprisingly well by today's standards, especially when you go back and play other games from the same year, but I can see where you're coming from.
As for the controls, that may because you were playing a console port of a PC game.
I agree, the shooting is pretty robotic, and the A.I. isn't great. Every firefight plays out the exact same way every time you play it.
Exactly. Valve have missed the point of episodic content entirely.They seriously need to work on Ep 3... Valve, do it, right now :evil:
lundy86_4
[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]It is just a copy off of a Pepsi ad but still looks cool.cobrax25
/fail
OMG I said the wrong product OMG how could I have done such a thing. Whatever bud I guess you watch more TV then me to remember the commercials so well. Anyways like I said it is a cool ad but all I said was it cool but just a copy from another ad.[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="SilentlyMad"]It is just a copy off of a Pepsi ad but still looks cool.SilentlyMad
/fail
OMG I said the wrong product OMG how could I have done such a thing. Whatever bud I guess you watch more TV then me to remember the commercials so well. Anyways like I said it is a cool ad but all I said was it cool but just a copy from another ad.I'm quite sure this and the pepsi commercial you're talking about both got their ideas from 1984.
[QUOTE="Guppy507"]Archaic because it doesn't have recharging health or aiming down iron sights?PBSnipes
To a degree (back-tracking for health-packs has always sucked, as has keeping multiple saves because you weren't sure whether X% health would be enough to get to the next health-pack; and iron-sights is more immersive than the old "zoom the screen in on your reticule), but more so because it by-and-large feels like a 90's-era corridor crawler.
If your level design is good you shouldn't need to backtrack for health.OMG I said the wrong product OMG how could I have done such a thing. Whatever bud I guess you watch more TV then me to remember the commercials so well. Anyways like I said it is a cool ad but all I said was it cool but just a copy from another ad.[QUOTE="SilentlyMad"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]
/fail
PSdual_wielder
I'm quite sure this and the pepsi commercial you're talking about both got their ideas from 1984.
I was wrong about the Pepsi thing. You are right about the 1984 thing though. This Valve ad is a copy of the Apple ad though and Apple got the idea from 1984.A trailer for a 6 year old game that wasn't anything special? lol valveRichardStallman
A 6 year old game that has recently been awarded things like Game of the Decade by IGN (among other places), and PC Gamer's Reader's Choice Best PC Game of All Time
6 years after it releases, and it's still getting critical acclaim.
It's the highest rated PC exclusive, won numerous GOTY awards, and awards for best physics, animations, AI, etc.
Valve is smart to advertise it so long after it was released. I mean I can only really think of Nintendo as another dev that advertises their games years after they came out because they realize those games are still worth something, and are still good. Must be why Nintendo is the industry leader in software sales 25+ years running.
Valve using the same technique is genius.
A trailer for a 6 year old game that wasn't anything special? lol valveRichardStallman
Half Life 2 holds a 96 on Metacritic, which leaves it as the highest rated PC game of all time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnF6Dr8BhKA&feature=player_embedded
lets see how many people are actually smart enough to understand.
cobrax25
You say smart enough to understand, but knowing about an old commercial they released isn't smart... It's called pop culture.
Just because someone knows all these old commercials/music/movies from the 80's doesn't make them smart. :P
Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. Ninja-HippoThey obviously aren't dedicating the same resources to stuff like this, as they are to the inevitable Episode 3 or Half-Life 3. People just need to be patient, when it arrives it will be amazing. Also, no one would be disappointed with Half-Life 2. I still know people who have just picked it up and LOVE it.
[QUOTE="cobrax25"]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnF6Dr8BhKA&feature=player_embedded
lets see how many people are actually smart enough to understand.
DragonfireXZ95
You say smart enough to understand, but knowing about an old commercial they released isn't smart... It's called pop culture.
Just because someone knows all these old commercials/music/movies from the 80's doesn't make them smart. :P
Its a very well known commercial...
[QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. Guppy507
While the gameplay is a little on the archaic side (even by 2004 standards), everything else still holds up quite well. Certainly better than 95% of the games coming out nowadays.
Archaic because it doesn't have recharging health or aiming down iron sights? The gunplay is trash, vehicle sections were awful, and the AI honestly wasn't that good. Half Life 2 made up for its core because it had such good pacing and level design. Plus it doesn't hurt that they actually tell a video game story the way it should be told.[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]Most people who haven't played Half Life 2 yet will be pretty disappointed if they play it today. It's too old, and Valve need to stop trying to get it on every platform in existence and work on episode 3 already. PBSnipes
While the gameplay is a little on the archaic side (even by 2004 standards), everything else still holds up quite well. Certainly better than 95% of the games coming out nowadays.
Agreed(such a sad moment). Game was so well done. All the other shooter devs keep screwing up on fundamentals and basics. It's kind of depressing.[QUOTE="PBSnipes"][QUOTE="Guppy507"]Archaic because it doesn't have recharging health or aiming down iron sights?skrat_01
To a degree (back-tracking for health-packs has always sucked, as has keeping multiple saves because you weren't sure whether X% health would be enough to get to the next health-pack; and iron-sights is more immersive than the old "zoom the screen in on your reticule), but more so because it by-and-large feels like a 90's-era corridor crawler.
If your level design is good you shouldn't need to backtrack for health. and there are points in the level design where you honestly did have to backtrack for health(or at the least the shield charger battery thing).[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="PBSnipes"]If your level design is good you shouldn't need to backtrack for health. and there are points in the level design where you honestly did have to backtrack for health(or at the least the shield charger battery thing). In HL2 its far and few in between; health packs are generally very well placed, enough not to break the flow of gameplay.To a degree (back-tracking for health-packs has always sucked, as has keeping multiple saves because you weren't sure whether X% health would be enough to get to the next health-pack; and iron-sights is more immersive than the old "zoom the screen in on your reticule), but more so because it by-and-large feels like a 90's-era corridor crawler.
jg4xchamp
To be honestly health packs as far as testing a level designers prowess goes is interesting, as honestly I think recharging health has given enough slack for very sloppy work. Yeah I am looking at you Infinity Ward people.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment