AC: Valhalla Native 4k60 on XSX - Upscaled 4k/60 on PS5

  • 91 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for regnaston
regnaston

1717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By regnaston
Member since 2008 • 1717 Posts

Saw a tweet by Gavin Stevens that said the PS5 version will be upscaled 4k/60

The site he links is in Italian but it quotes a Dualshockers article in the article is says

In a follow-up message sent to us by a PR representative at the publisher, this notion was also made clear once again. “I can confirm that Assassin’s Creed Valhalla runs at 4K at 60 fps on PS5 (upscaled 4K),”

Whereas the XSX version is reported to run at Native 4k60 (aka Full 4k/60)

https://www.kitguru.net/gaming/mustafa-mahmoud/assassins-creed-valhalla-will-run-at-native-4k-60fps-on-xbox-series-x/

Interesting if true

Avatar image for BlackShirt20
BlackShirt20

2424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 BlackShirt20
Member since 2005 • 2424 Posts

While I’m not shocked PS5 is dynamic 4K. I would be shocked if Xbox Series X is native 4K.

Regardless, this generation is not about resolution. With the technology inside these machines you can make games look incredible but not be forced to skimp on performance.

For example PS5 is running Demon Souls at 1440p and it looks decent. Doesn’t blow me away and looks boring as hell, but is visually better then most current gen games and performs at 60fps. As long as you can give me stable 60fps, I Don’t care what resolution the game is.

Avatar image for briguyb13
briguyb13

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 briguyb13
Member since 2007 • 5118 Posts

Megaton.

Avatar image for masonshoemocker
masonshoemocker

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 masonshoemocker
Member since 2003 • 713 Posts

So the 12 teraflops and 52 CUs actually make a difference? Oh.

Avatar image for Sagemode87
Sagemode87

1995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Sagemode87
Member since 2013 • 1995 Posts

Grasping at straws hard because you know Series X is shit. Who is this guy and why is he credible? The game was confirmed the same on both long ago. Lems can't let it go. Sad.

Avatar image for briguyb13
briguyb13

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 briguyb13
Member since 2007 • 5118 Posts

@Sagemode87 said:

Grasping at straws hard because you know Series X is shit. Who is this guy and why is he credible? The game was confirmed the same on both long ago. Lems can't let it go. Sad.

PS5 only does faux K, your console is shit. LOL

Avatar image for netracing
netracing

840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By netracing
Member since 2018 • 840 Posts

Does the game have Ray tracing? If so it's impressive performance.

Seems the ubisoft Valhalla team can optimise better than the watch dogs one.

Avatar image for briguyb13
briguyb13

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 briguyb13
Member since 2007 • 5118 Posts

@Sagemode87 said:

@briguyb13: If that were the case, wouldn't change the fact that Xbox is less relevant than Playstation and will have less good games. Get laid fanboy.

triggered!

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

32791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 Archangel3371  Online
Member since 2004 • 32791 Posts

Don’t really care one way or the other myself but boy would I ever get a good chuckle over this if true. 😅

Avatar image for hitmanactual
HitmanActual

1289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#11 HitmanActual
Member since 2013 • 1289 Posts

Avatar image for ghost_of_phobos
Ghost_of_Phobos

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#12  Edited By Ghost_of_Phobos
Member since 2020 • 704 Posts

Cool for SW but whatever.If the Blurstation 5 couldn't run it at 60fps would be way worse.

Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

6776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 6776 Posts

I don't care either way but I would at least wait for something that isn't translated 3 times and interpreted through yet another unrelated source.

As long as it looks good and can run at 60 fps I'm happy.

Avatar image for bluestars
Bluestars

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#14  Edited By Bluestars
Member since 2019 • 2031 Posts

9.2 tinyflops

hah

Avatar image for sts106mat
sts106mat

25075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 sts106mat
Member since 2005 • 25075 Posts

cows still cant catch a break

Avatar image for ellos
ellos

2470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By ellos
Member since 2015 • 2470 Posts

Would be interesting to know how far off is it. Is it 1440p or 1800p.

Avatar image for EZs
EZs

1469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 EZs
Member since 2005 • 1469 Posts

Ah the table has turned. It's like 900P drama again :(

But it's ok, we have superior 3D audio, load time and dual sense ;)

Avatar image for sts106mat
sts106mat

25075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 sts106mat
Member since 2005 • 25075 Posts

@Sagemode87 said:

@briguyb13: If that were the case, wouldn't change the fact that Xbox is less relevant than Playstation and will have less good games. Get laid fanboy.

hahaha meltdown confirmed,.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

35574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 35574 Posts

Takes an i7 9700k and RTX3080 to do AC Valhalla in 4k/30

Consoles have PC beat with this one

Avatar image for masonshoemocker
masonshoemocker

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By masonshoemocker
Member since 2003 • 713 Posts

@EZs said:

Ah the table has turned. It's like 900P drama again :(

But it's ok, we have superior 3D audio, load time and dual sense ;)

Ah the beginning of this gen (soon to be last gen). All the Sony heads putting down the Xbox One 720p Battlefield 4 against the 900p PS4.

Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

8288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 Sushiglutton
Member since 2009 • 8288 Posts

Just move your couch back two meters and you won’t be able to tell.

Seriously though this is harmful for Sony if the word gets around. One X was punished for not be able to do 1080p for COD.

People don’t really care that much about absolute power. But they also don’t want to pay the same money for something that is inferior. Xbox keeps gaining momentum.

Avatar image for gym_lion
Gym_Lion

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22 Gym_Lion
Member since 2020 • 74 Posts

Still... Good news about the vibrating triggers at least.

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

6388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 6388 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:

Takes an i7 9700k and RTX3080 to do AC Valhalla in 4k/30

Consoles have PC beat with this one

prob has next-gen DRM, pc wins again.

Avatar image for ghost_of_phobos
Ghost_of_Phobos

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24  Edited By Ghost_of_Phobos
Member since 2020 • 704 Posts

I think Ubi already clarified that it runs 4k/60 in the PS5.

Avatar image for rzxv04
rzxv04

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#25 rzxv04
Member since 2018 • 2072 Posts

As expected.

Avatar image for rzxv04
rzxv04

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#26 rzxv04
Member since 2018 • 2072 Posts

@BlackShirt20 said:

While I’m not shocked PS5 is dynamic 4K. I would be shocked if Xbox Series X is native 4K.

Regardless, this generation is not about resolution. With the technology inside these machines you can make games look incredible but not be forced to skimp on performance.

For example PS5 is running Demon Souls at 1440p and it looks decent. Doesn’t blow me away and looks boring as hell, but is visually better then most current gen games and performs at 60fps. As long as you can give me stable 60fps, I Don’t care what resolution the game is.

Call me batshat insane. I'd like to see Naughty Dog, Santa Monica, etc. do 1080p/30 fps and pump up density, lighting, particles.

Avatar image for Sagemode87
Sagemode87

1995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Sagemode87
Member since 2013 • 1995 Posts

@ghost_of_phobos: They just won't rest until they see some sort of justification for their system. It's so pathetic.

Avatar image for sts106mat
sts106mat

25075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 sts106mat
Member since 2005 • 25075 Posts

@Sagemode87 said:

@ghost_of_phobos: They just won't rest until they see some sort of justification for their system. It's so pathetic.

weak response - weak sauce - weak console stay striggered chicken boy

Avatar image for tdkmillsy
tdkmillsy

4094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 tdkmillsy
Member since 2003 • 4094 Posts

Fake 4k on PlayStation again, we need to see benchmarks before forming an overall opinion mind.

I think I'd still prefer fake 4k on Series X with better quality and affects.

Either way first big example of the power of Series X over PS5.

Where are the cows in this thread?

Avatar image for gym_lion
Gym_Lion

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#30 Gym_Lion
Member since 2020 • 74 Posts

@Sagemode87 said:

@ghost_of_phobos: They just won't rest until they see some sort of justification for their system. It's so pathetic.

You don't sound very secure over your purchase either.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33549 Posts

@briguyb13:

But but but i am not a lemming.😂😂😂

Avatar image for the6millionlies
The6millionLies

485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#32  Edited By The6millionLies
Member since 2020 • 485 Posts

If you thought there wouldn't be differences then you thought wrong , having that said.. I will just wait for Digital Foundry confirmation.

Edit :

Won't surprise me if both are upscaled lol.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

37219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 37219 Posts

Poo cows, gonna be a long cold gen for'em. :P

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

44872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

#34  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 44872 Posts

This must be incorrect.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33549 Posts

@regnaston:

Why would it be interesting if true? I would say that if there was no difference the xbox is more powerful it was about time that a game at least showed an advantage of some kind.

@ellos said:

Would be interesting to know how far off is it. Is it 1440p or 1800p.

Based on the power gap i think neither, maybe a few less pixels.

@masonshoemocker said:

Ah the beginning of this gen (soon to be last gen). All the Sony heads putting down the Xbox One 720p Battlefield 4 against the 900p PS4.

And before that for 2 generations in a row xbox fans hyped superior versions, yet could not see a difference in 2013.

Also BF4 gap was quite big it was 57% more pixels on top of that BF4 ran 10FPS on average faster on PS4.

Thats not a small gap.

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

14384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#36 xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 14384 Posts

That's impossible - the power difference is nonexistent and devs will favor the PS5 anyway because reasons. Oh and my enjoyment of gameplay is directly correlated with the nativeness of resolution, so I will die on a hill downplaying any evidence to the contrary

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

10541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#37 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 10541 Posts

We'll have to wait and see. It wouldn't be the first time Ubisoft PR had given out wrong info regarding Valhalla on next gen consoles.

And fwiw, I'm not sure why people use that guy as a source. He spends more time fueling console wars than working on his own game.

Avatar image for ButDuuude
ButDuuude

1764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 ButDuuude
Member since 2013 • 1764 Posts

And here we go with the misinformation again.

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

4929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 4929 Posts

LOL i thought the power difference was too small to make any difference. And this is a last gen game 🤣 What will happen with proper next gen titles 🤣

Tormy will not be able to damage control this. This is looking real bad.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

44872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

#41 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 44872 Posts

**Drumroll** Let the damage control begin. Oh! It already started. My bad. 😎

Avatar image for tdkmillsy
tdkmillsy

4094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 tdkmillsy
Member since 2003 • 4094 Posts

@tormentos said:

@regnaston:

Why would it be interesting if true? I would say that if there was no difference the xbox is more powerful it was about time that a game at least showed an advantage of some kind.

@ellos said:

Would be interesting to know how far off is it. Is it 1440p or 1800p.

Based on the power gap i think neither, maybe a few less pixels.

@masonshoemocker said:

Ah the beginning of this gen (soon to be last gen). All the Sony heads putting down the Xbox One 720p Battlefield 4 against the 900p PS4.

And before that for 2 generations in a row xbox fans hyped superior versions, yet could not see a difference in 2013.

Also BF4 gap was quite big it was 57% more pixels on top of that BF4 ran 10FPS on average faster on PS4.

Thats not a small gap.

Keep looking in the past, because it dont look good looking forward.

Avatar image for hardwenzen
hardwenzen

4929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By hardwenzen
Member since 2005 • 4929 Posts

For those thinking this is not big deal, lol no. This is bad for marketing. Everywhere on youtube, twitter, reddit people will talk about a last gen game with last gen visuals that can't even run at a native 4k, just like the Pro, a current gen system available for years. Ouch.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

44872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

#44 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 44872 Posts

@hardwenzen said:

For those thinking this is not big deal, lol no. This is bad for marketing. Everywhere on youtube, twitter, reddit people will talk about a last gen game with last gen visuals that can't even run at a native 4k, just like the Pro, a current gen system available for years. Ouch.

Nah! Resolution isn't going to matter anymore, well until it does. 😉

Avatar image for the6millionlies
The6millionLies

485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#45 The6millionLies
Member since 2020 • 485 Posts

@Pedro: Loading times is the new cool and infinity cache

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

13097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 150

User Lists: 0

#46 BassMan
Member since 2002 • 13097 Posts

You can get more performance or higher resolution out of a more powerful GPU?...

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

15806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 15806 Posts

That DualShockers article doesn't help either. It clearly says in the quote that it's upscaled 4K for PS5, yet they come to the conclusion that the game runs at 4K. Seems they don't understand the difference. In any case, this is expected for multipatform games. Heck even Demon's Souls runs at upscaled 4K for 60 fps. What I'm actually surprised about is that the Series X is native. I wonder if that'll have any performance impacts as we saw with RE3 remake on the One X?

Avatar image for dagubot
Dagubot

383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#48 Dagubot
Member since 2020 • 383 Posts

@Sagemode87: My boy got triggered and abandoned thread 😂😂😂

Avatar image for BigBadBully
BigBadBully

2323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 BigBadBully
Member since 2006 • 2323 Posts

Any info on Xbox series s, am I going to need my 32x boost to bump the resolution?

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

14199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 NathanDrakeSwag  Online
Member since 2013 • 14199 Posts

Lol imagine caring about Ass Creed. I'll be too busy with far superior games.