7 minutes of Streets of Rage 4 gameplay (lol Battletoads)

  • 80 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#51 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19379 Posts

@ghosts4ever said:

what SOR4 needed was big budget, need to be action game with hand to hand combat or maybe sega should partnered with Rocksteady to make a next gen street of rage 4.

**** no! Rocksteady's combat system is just a dumbed-down version of the Sands of Time combat system. Keep that casual Rocksteady combat well away from SOR!

Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
X_CAPCOM_X

9552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52  Edited By X_CAPCOM_X
Member since 2004 • 9552 Posts

This looks absolutely incredible. The animations are new takes on classic moves, the movement style is a mixture of sor3 and 2 (almost like they paid close attention to the fan remake project) and so much more.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#53 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19379 Posts

@X_CAPCOM_X: Yeah, it looks very promising. Like Sonic Mania. Only issue I have is the aspect ratio, which looks stretched and makes the characters look fat.

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts

@ghosts4ever said:

@WESTBLADE: I upgraded to 1070 actually.

btw 960 run RE2 on max and Metro on medium which still looks better any game released in 2019.

LOL! Punny 1080p and sinking below 30 fps is not "max". That 1070 isn't a miracle either in 2019.

You still repeat the year "2019" while having a mindset of early 2000's budget PC gamer... "Wow, i can max out Half-Life 2 at 800x600!!! Imma part of PC master race!" All of that without being to able hit to at least 30 fps, but who cares... "I'm playing on ULTRA."

in 2019 (LOL), and the PC standards of 2019 (LOLx2) being 1440p@60fps, good luck with that 1070. cause even my OC'ed RTX 2070 (on par with stock 2070 SUPER, 9+ TFLOPs) struggles to max out some games at 1440p with locked 60 fps, especially when using graphics tech from 2018 in 2019 (LOLx3) like ray-traycing.

TL;DR: Jeez dude, i hope you're either a teenager or new to PC gaming...

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

24847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 24847 Posts

@WESTBLADE said:
@ghosts4ever said:

@WESTBLADE: I upgraded to 1070 actually.

btw 960 run RE2 on max and Metro on medium which still looks better any game released in 2019.

LOL! Punny 1080p and sinking below 30 fps is not "max". That 1070 isn't a miracle either in 2019.

You still repeat the year "2019" while having a mindset of early 2000's budget PC gamer... "Wow, i can max out Half-Life 2 at 800x600!!! Imma part of PC master race!" All of that without being to able hit to at least 30 fps, but who cares... "I'm playing on ULTRA."

in 2019 (LOL), and the PC standards of 2019 (LOLx2) being 1440p@60fps, good luck with that 1070. cause even my OC'ed RTX 2070 (on par with stock 2070 SUPER, 9+ TFLOPs) struggles to max out some games at 1440p with locked 60 fps, especially when using graphics tech from 2018 in 2019 (LOLx3) like ray-traycing.

TL;DR: Jeez dude, i hope you're either a teenager or new to PC gaming...

I have been gaming on PC since 90s. come on

beside 1070 run any game on max.

you dont need 10000$ super computer to run latest games. thats why PC gaming is cheaper than consoles.

960 can run RE2 on max. can run Metro Exodus on medium. I upgrade it just for Doom Eternal because i know it can lag. plus I have 16 GB ram. you know i5 4th generation can also run any game on max in 2019. but my friend you have mindset that every one should have i9 9th generation with 2080 RTX etc.

you know not every one is super rich and can afford a super computer.

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56  Edited By deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts

@ghosts4ever said:
@WESTBLADE said:
@ghosts4ever said:

@WESTBLADE: I upgraded to 1070 actually.

btw 960 run RE2 on max and Metro on medium which still looks better any game released in 2019.

LOL! Punny 1080p and sinking below 30 fps is not "max". That 1070 isn't a miracle either in 2019.

You still repeat the year "2019" while having a mindset of early 2000's budget PC gamer... "Wow, i can max out Half-Life 2 at 800x600!!! Imma part of PC master race!" All of that without being to able hit to at least 30 fps, but who cares... "I'm playing on ULTRA."

in 2019 (LOL), and the PC standards of 2019 (LOLx2) being 1440p@60fps, good luck with that 1070. cause even my OC'ed RTX 2070 (on par with stock 2070 SUPER, 9+ TFLOPs) struggles to max out some games at 1440p with locked 60 fps, especially when using graphics tech from 2018 in 2019 (LOLx3) like ray-traycing.

TL;DR: Jeez dude, i hope you're either a teenager or new to PC gaming...

I have been gaming on PC since 90s. come on

beside 1070 run any game on max.

you dont need 10000$ super computer to run latest games. thats why PC gaming is cheaper than consoles.

960 can run RE2 on max. can run Metro Exodus on medium. I upgrade it just for Doom Eternal because i know it can lag. plus I have 16 GB ram. you know i5 4th generation can also run any game on max in 2019. but my friend you have mindset that every one should have i9 9th generation with 2080 RTX etc.

you know not every one is super rich and can afford a super computer.

You: Haswell i5. GTX 1070. 16GB DDR3 RAM. Any game on max.

Me: WTFLOL

If you're serious, please don't ever spread your clueless "wisdom" again. First of all, you probably don't even understand what running a game "on max" means. Just because you can turn on all the settings to its highest and then run a game in stuttery sub 20 fps mess is NOT what in terms of PC gaming "running on max/ultra" means. You you basically got a worse sibling to Xbox One X, without any performance optimalization the console gets.

Do you realize that your i5 bottlenecks that GPU and can be a nasty bottleneck on its own in modern games too, right?

As for RE2+i5 Haswell+GTX960 and the bullshit you're spreading: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLq2OKwHB8A

No, not everyone has to game on high-end PC's (look at my current PC in my sig, currently not one of them, joining "them" again next year, when DDR5's are out for sure, though). Just the people with crap PC's shouldn't spread lies and tell fairytales of what they budget PC's can (NOT) do.

TL;DR: Gaming on PC since 90's and still knowing shit about it. What an achievement...

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

24847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 24847 Posts

@WESTBLADE said:

TL;DR: Gaming on PC since 90's and still knowing shit about it. What an achievement...

I build what i can afford.

and yes haswell can run any game on high may not max. it wont run cyberpunk on max but can run on high.

hawell is nice old budget decent processor and i can run Metro exodus fine.

CPUs and GPUs are waay too expensive in my region. so its not easy for us to build a super computer.

a budgeted mid range PC can run any game on max. just turn off some anti aliasing and motion blur.

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts

@ghosts4ever: I've got a Haswell too (i7-4790K), except it's the top-end one and overclocked to its limits (where it's stable, i hate BSOD as much as i hate clueless people spreading nonsense) so i basically have a stock i7-7700K.
Still can be/is a bottleneck...?

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

24847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#59  Edited By Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 24847 Posts

@WESTBLADE: beside i can afford console but i dont have any interest in console gaming. simply its more expensive and I have no interest in any of thier exclusive.

I rather game on mid end PC than game on console.

btw i5 4th generation is better than i7 3rd generation..

Avatar image for l3igl3oss
l3igl3oss

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60  Edited By l3igl3oss
Member since 2004 • 74 Posts

I don't know what the purpose is to play games on max settings by spending a lot when you could look back on them later with more affordable technology. You're basically playing these games past a certain threshold, because the developers aren't pushing your machine, but optimizing them for consoles due to their set limit, so I use the latter as a benchmark for how games are supposed to look like, and try to get better performance at a similar price point. The Dreamcast was, for example, more powerful than what you could get on PC for the same price. SEGA's last console was, in fact, not surpassed by PC upon release. In terms of games, Metal Gear Solid looked better on the PS2 as a Playstation title than it did on PC, whose resolutions are so high that they didn't mask the low polygon count and texture detail.

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts

@ghosts4ever said:

@WESTBLADE: beside i can afford console but i dont have any interest in console gaming. simply its more expensive and I have no interest in any of thier exclusive.

I rather game on mid end PC than game on console.

btw i5 4th generation is better than i7 3rd generation..

So what? My i7-4790K shits all over your i5-4xxx (whatever model) and it is a bottleneck in some games. WTF are you even talking about?

BTW, if you think you have a midend PC, wake up... I have a midend PC thanks to my CPU+RAM being outdated (bought them in 2014) and it's the RTX 2070 that somewhat "covers" my ass...

I give up talking to you, you're either trolling or too stupid and can't comprehend what i'm saying. I prefer the latter thanks to your "GTX 960 can run RE2 Remake on max" which is downright nonsense...?

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts

@l3igl3oss said:

I don't know what the purpose is to play games on max settings by spending a lot when you could look back on them later with more affordable technology.

LOLWUT? Okay, so by your hilarious "logic", i should wait 4-5 more years to play games like Metro Exodus (just started playing it yesterday) or wait 'til like 2022 so i can play Forza Horizon 4 @ 4k/60fps. Sweet...?

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

24847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#63 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 24847 Posts

@WESTBLADE:

You dont. Metro exodus on customize setting with quality on high and turn off some options can play and looks amazing still.

My mid end PC run Doom 2016 on ultra with no FPS drop. I'm sure it can handle Eternal too. Since I jump from 960 to high end 1070.

I will play Cyberpunk on max on this rig.

You my friend giving PC gamers a bad name.

Avatar image for Valkeerie
Valkeerie

325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64  Edited By Valkeerie
Member since 2013 • 325 Posts
@l3igl3oss said:

I don't know what the purpose is to play games on max settings by spending a lot when you could look back on them later with more affordable technology. You're basically playing these games past a certain threshold, because the developers aren't pushing your machine, but optimizing them for consoles due to their set limit, so I use the latter as a benchmark for how games are supposed to look like, and try to get better performance at a similar price point. The Dreamcast was, for example, more powerful than what you could get on PC for the same price. SEGA's last console was, in fact, not surpassed by PC upon release. In terms of games, Metal Gear Solid looked better on the PS2 as a Playstation title than it did on PC, whose resolutions are so high that they didn't mask the low polygon count and texture detail.

Thumbs up!

Avatar image for vfighter
VFighter

11031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 VFighter
Member since 2016 • 11031 Posts

@ghosts4ever: Ghost, stop, why can't you understand when you've lost, badly I might add, and just stop posting? Do you enjoy the daily beatings you take?

Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
X_CAPCOM_X

9552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 X_CAPCOM_X
Member since 2004 • 9552 Posts

@Jag85: yeah I hope they do fix that distorted screen. I assume they are trying to keep the old screen size. I would be in favor of just changing that to 16:9.

Avatar image for latech84
LAtech84

642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#68  Edited By LAtech84
Member since 2017 • 642 Posts

@WESTBLADE I am confused what you mean by the worse sibling to the Xbox One X, I've always heard that the GTX 1070 is faster/more powerful than the Xbox One X in most games, Almost everyone on the internet and in forums has always agreed on this even with any of the optimization. Also I have a GTX 1070 and it does run most games in 2019 maxed out at close to 60 FPS or 60 FPS, never have I seen any games I own run under 30 maxed out at 1080P, maybe you were referring to 1440P? and even then I imagine most would run at, at least 30 steady and most likely 45 to 50 on average. Anyway sorry to hijack your post just had to respond to that part as I think it is factually incorrect and so does most of the internet. No hard feelings though.

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

24847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#69 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 24847 Posts
@latech84 said:

@WESTBLADE I am confused what you mean by the worse sibling to the Xbox One X, I've always heard that the GTX 1070 is faster/more powerful than the Xbox One X in most games, Almost everyone on the internet and in forums has always agreed on this even with any of the optimization. Also I have a GTX 1070 and it does run most games in 2019 maxed out at close to 60 FPS or 60 FPS, never have I seen any games I own run under 30 maxed out at 1080P, maybe you were referring to 1440P? and even then I imagine most would run at, at least 30 steady and most likely 45 to 50 on average. Anyway sorry to hijack your post just had to respond to that part as I think it is factually incorrect and so does most of the internet. No hard feelings though.

even RX 580 is higher than PS4 pro and can run any game on ultra. a budgeted card.

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70  Edited By deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts

@ghosts4ever said:
@latech84 said:

@WESTBLADE I am confused what you mean by the worse sibling to the Xbox One X, I've always heard that the GTX 1070 is faster/more powerful than the Xbox One X in most games, Almost everyone on the internet and in forums has always agreed on this even with any of the optimization. Also I have a GTX 1070 and it does run most games in 2019 maxed out at close to 60 FPS or 60 FPS, never have I seen any games I own run under 30 maxed out at 1080P, maybe you were referring to 1440P? and even then I imagine most would run at, at least 30 steady and most likely 45 to 50 on average. Anyway sorry to hijack your post just had to respond to that part as I think it is factually incorrect and so does most of the internet. No hard feelings though.

even RX 580 is higher than PS4 pro and can run any game on ultra. a budgeted card.

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

24847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#71 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 24847 Posts
@WESTBLADE said:
@ghosts4ever said:
@latech84 said:

@WESTBLADE I am confused what you mean by the worse sibling to the Xbox One X, I've always heard that the GTX 1070 is faster/more powerful than the Xbox One X in most games, Almost everyone on the internet and in forums has always agreed on this even with any of the optimization. Also I have a GTX 1070 and it does run most games in 2019 maxed out at close to 60 FPS or 60 FPS, never have I seen any games I own run under 30 maxed out at 1080P, maybe you were referring to 1440P? and even then I imagine most would run at, at least 30 steady and most likely 45 to 50 on average. Anyway sorry to hijack your post just had to respond to that part as I think it is factually incorrect and so does most of the internet. No hard feelings though.

even RX 580 is higher than PS4 pro and can run any game on ultra. a budgeted card.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72  Edited By deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts

@latech84: That's quite "my point" here, can't keep stable 60 fps at 1080p in 2019. 1080p is quite the standard desktop PC resolution since like 2008, now we shall be all set at at least 1440p@60. At least those of us who don't want to feel like playing on an overpriced console (me).

I don't know about you, but can't imagine playing PC games in 1080p on my 75" TV/monitor. Well, i get the idea how it's like thanks to some games on my PS4 (blurry mess). It's like playing PS3 and X360 games on my old 55" 1080p TV/monitor back then.

Though if you've got a tiny monitor, you probably can't relate...

Avatar image for latech84
LAtech84

642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#73 LAtech84
Member since 2017 • 642 Posts

@WESTBLADE: I understand what your saying and I respect that, but I feel overall I still get a much better experience with my 1070 that I would get with any current console. My monitor is not small for a monitor, It is small compared to a huge TV, I have a 32 Inch (31.5 Inch viewable) Monitor. I really do respect what you are saying though and I fully understand your point of view. Just giving my opinion and point of view. Thanks.

Avatar image for pimphand_gamer
PimpHand_Gamer

3048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#74  Edited By PimpHand_Gamer
Member since 2014 • 3048 Posts

I'm not into this cartoon look for these remakes. It just loses all nostalgic appeal that pixels have. The Openbor Streets of Rage is more like it.

Avatar image for BenjaminBanklin
BenjaminBanklin

11002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 BenjaminBanklin
Member since 2004 • 11002 Posts

I'm hyped for this game, and need it in my veins. I call it the anti-Battletoads.

Avatar image for GameboyTroy
GameboyTroy

9723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#76 GameboyTroy
Member since 2011 • 9723 Posts

Here's gameplay from PAX West 2019 in 60fps.

https://gematsu.com/2019/08/streets-of-rage-4-pax-west-2019-gameplay

https://gematsu.com/tag/streets-of-rage-4

Loading Video...

Avatar image for heythere1984
HeyThere1984

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#77 HeyThere1984
Member since 2019 • 5 Posts

I was on the fence about this for awhile but it really has shaped up nicely!

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78  Edited By Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21695 Posts

I might as well post this since the thread got bumped:

Loading Video...

If you notice, aerial specials are a new feature. In particular, I can see Blaze's flying kick having a lot of combo potential.

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79  Edited By deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts
@latech84 said:

@WESTBLADE: I understand what your saying and I respect that, but I feel overall I still get a much better experience with my 1070 that I would get with any current console. My monitor is not small for a monitor, It is small compared to a huge TV, I have a 32 Inch (31.5 Inch viewable) Monitor. I really do respect what you are saying though and I fully understand your point of view. Just giving my opinion and point of view. Thanks.

32"... Hmm, how far is your head from that monitor and what's the native res though? You must/can literally count the pixels @ 1080p if you are watching it from like ~50 cm distance. I could see all the pixels on 24" screen @ 1080p back in ~2008. Not dissing you, just wondering.

Avatar image for latech84
LAtech84

642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#80 LAtech84
Member since 2017 • 642 Posts

@WESTBLADE: Yes happy to answer, I am about 2 to 2 and 1/2 feet away most of the time, 2 feet when gaming and 2 and 1/2 feet when watching videos, I personally don't see pixels when I am doing those two things, I can see them if I look closely at the desktop background in Windows. It's native resolution is 1080P , now granted I have not really spent any time looking at higher res displays, so it's possible I am just used to how it looks/have adjusted, as I am sure if I had a higher res monitor and went back it may look allot worse to me. I have considered upgrading to a higher res screen but have not done so yet. Thanks for your respectful reply's.

Avatar image for deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
deactivated-5efed3ebc2180

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81  Edited By deactivated-5efed3ebc2180
Member since 2006 • 923 Posts
@latech84 said:

@WESTBLADE: Yes happy to answer, I am about 2 to 2 and 1/2 feet away most of the time, 2 feet when gaming and 2 and 1/2 feet when watching videos, I personally don't see pixels when I am doing those two things, I can see them if I look closely at the desktop background in Windows. It's native resolution is 1080P , now granted I have not really spent any time looking at higher res displays, so it's possible I am just used to how it looks/have adjusted, as I am sure if I had a higher res monitor and went back it may look allot worse to me. I have considered upgrading to a higher res screen but have not done so yet. Thanks for your respectful reply's.

Hehe, i'm only in full savage/asshole mode on people like that ghosts4ever guy who pirates games and is spreading pure nonsense as written facts...;) To be honest, i'm not afraid to claim that IRL i'm very honest and well-mannered person. Well, whatever...

As for your monitor, 2 and half feet is approx. 75 cm, which is a fair distance i'd say, especially if you are used to that monitor for a long time. However once you "upgrade" you can't go back that easily, if at all... Just imagine you would have to replace yours with some 22" 768p screen and you get the idea, right? :)