[4K HDR] Forza Horizon 3: Xbox One X Full Developer Interview! 60fps possible

  • 195 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#101  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@Pedro said:

Its not unplayable regardless of how many times you repeat it. There is a difference between unplayable vs less than desirable. Mixing the two for drama sake doesn't make your claim right.

It's effectively game-breaking. Pretty unplayable to me. I mean 15fps is in practice playable too.

You are free to think and have the right to feel that 30 fps is unplayable. There is nothing wrong with that but its not a factual statement but a personal stance on fps in games.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@Pedro said:

Its not unplayable regardless of how many times you repeat it. There is a difference between unplayable vs less than desirable. Mixing the two for drama sake doesn't make your claim right.

It's effectively game-breaking. Pretty unplayable to me. I mean 15fps is in practice playable too.

If it was unplayable it wouldn’t have a 91% Average on metacritic :)

15 FPS Is unplayable, unable games due to frame rate issues are reviewed poorly accordingly.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@Pedro said:

You are free to think and have the right to feel that 30 fps is unplayable. There is nothing wrong with that but its not a factual statement but a personal stance on fps in games.

It is factual that it is game-breaking for a fighting game though. We're talking about a genre where 2-3 frames in a move/combo can completely alter the way a match is played. Some moves can be made completely ineffective by adding several frames to their lengths. Again as I said, 15fps is in practice very "playable" but where do we draw the line? Moves/set ups/combos can be broken at 30fps in a fighting game. That's where "unplayable" starts.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@GioVela2010 said:

If it was unplayable it wouldn’t have a 91% Average on metacritic :)

15 FPS Is unplayable, unable games due to frame rate issues are reviewed poorly accordingly.

Not talking about Forza. Talking about fighting games.

Avatar image for scatteh316
scatteh316

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By scatteh316
Member since 2004 • 10273 Posts

@Pedro said:
@scatteh316 said:

As you're clearly struggling...... You stated that a mere ~3% of steam users game on stronger hardware....

Which is not correct.... There's more then 3 GPU's that are stronger then the RX580 level GPU that's in X and when adding them all up the number is greater then 3%, so you are wrong.

But that's redundant anyway as I've said before, you can't use STEAM numbers because they only dip sample a set small percentage and then extrapolate (make up) the numbers for everyone with an account based on that dip sample.

What the cards you speak of on the list that is stronger than the 1070,1080 and 1080Ti. Because these three are non debatably faster.

As I've already stated.... Vega 56, Vega 64 and Vega 64LC.

Also the 1070ti...... And I would strongly argue the GTX1060 is 'generally' faster then Xbox X.

Then there's the Fury X cards........ which can also be argued are faster then X's 'RX580' level GPU.

So your claimed '3%' is way off.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#106  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58304 Posts

When are you people going to stop buying into their bullshit advertising and start caring about the games?

For Christ's sake, 30 fps, 60 fps, checkerboard 4k or real...is the game fun?

Stop caring about the unimportant stuff, this dickmeasuring has got to stop.

Is there cross-platform (PC and Xbox) play on this game? That is what I want to see, playing games together across multiple platforms.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@scatteh316 said:

As I've already stated.... Vega 56, Vega 64 and Vega 64LC.

Also the 1070ti...... And I would strongly argue the GTX1060 is 'generally' faster then Xbox X.

Then there's the Fury X cards........ which can also be argued are faster then X's 'RX580' level GPU.

So your claimed '3%' is way off.

Fury is a about as fast as a 1060 which is in turn faster than the RX 580. I wouldn't consider the Xbox One X GPU slower than the 1060 though. It sits between a 1060 and a 1070 but much closer to a 1060. At 4K a 1060 is 100, a 1070 is 140. The X1X GPU would probably be around 105-115. Fury X is a good comparable to what the X1X is sporting.

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 daredevils2k
Member since 2015 • 5001 Posts

Well duh Lemmings , you act as if lowering the graphics quality is a new thing . So what we’ve all learned is that the almighty Xb1x isn’t powerful enough to run the game at ultra , 4K @ 60fps

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 225

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17806 Posts

@i_p_daily said:

Guys like juub, bassman, davillan etc will tell us playing at 30fps is "unplayable" but turn around and buy consoles and these 30fps games because they are fucking hypocrites.

This has to be said to guys like the ones above, practise what you preach or just STFU, because the only people looking like fools here are you guys.

I always practice what I preach. I play FH3 on PC at 1440p/60fps+ and 2160p/60fps depending if I am playing on the monitor or TV. I only play exclusives on console and it sucks when they are limited to 30fps. It is so distracting, immersion breaking, and does not feel good.

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:

Guys like juub, bassman, davillan etc will tell us playing at 30fps is "unplayable" but turn around and buy consoles and these 30fps games because they are fucking hypocrites.

This has to be said to guys like the ones above, practise what you preach or just STFU, because the only people looking like fools here are you guys.

I always practice what I preach. I play FH3 on PC at 1440p/60fps+ and 2160p/60fps depending if I am playing on the monitor or TV. I only play exclusives on console and it sucks when they are limited to 30fps. It is so distracting, immersion breaking, and does not feel good.

No you don't and just proved it with your own post.

You preach 60fps FACT.

You own consoles and play 30fps games FACT.

You do NOT practise what you preach and are a hypocrite FACT.

Glad we could clear that up.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 225

User Lists: 0

#111  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17806 Posts

@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:

Guys like juub, bassman, davillan etc will tell us playing at 30fps is "unplayable" but turn around and buy consoles and these 30fps games because they are fucking hypocrites.

This has to be said to guys like the ones above, practise what you preach or just STFU, because the only people looking like fools here are you guys.

I always practice what I preach. I play FH3 on PC at 1440p/60fps+ and 2160p/60fps depending if I am playing on the monitor or TV. I only play exclusives on console and it sucks when they are limited to 30fps. It is so distracting, immersion breaking, and does not feel good.

No you don't and just proved it with your own post.

You preach 60fps FACT.

You own consoles and play 30fps games FACT.

You do NOT practise what you preach and are a hypocrite FACT.

Glad we could clear that up.

When have I ever said that I never play games at 30fps? 30fps is shit and I avoid it whenever possible, but I still play some exclusives at 30fps because I have no other option.

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:

Guys like juub, bassman, davillan etc will tell us playing at 30fps is "unplayable" but turn around and buy consoles and these 30fps games because they are fucking hypocrites.

This has to be said to guys like the ones above, practise what you preach or just STFU, because the only people looking like fools here are you guys.

I always practice what I preach. I play FH3 on PC at 1440p/60fps+ and 2160p/60fps depending if I am playing on the monitor or TV. I only play exclusives on console and it sucks when they are limited to 30fps. It is so distracting, immersion breaking, and does not feel good.

No you don't and just proved it with your own post.

You preach 60fps FACT.

You own consoles and play 30fps games FACT.

You do NOT practise what you preach and are a hypocrite FACT.

Glad we could clear that up.

When have I ever said that I never play games at 30fps? 30fps is shit and I avoid it whenever possible, but I still play some exclusives at 30fps because I have no other option.

You simply don't get it, and you're meant to be a "master race" guy.

You preach that 60fps is the minimal standard in which games should be played at, and if that's your standard then you should not be playing games below (30fps) that standard, by doing so that makes you a hypocrite, because you don't practise what you preach, is that really too hard for you to understand?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@BassMan said:

When have I ever said that I never play games at 30fps? 30fps is shit and I avoid it whenever possible, but I still play some exclusives at 30fps because I have no other option.

He's obviously too stupid to see the nuance.

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@BassMan said:

When have I ever said that I never play games at 30fps? 30fps is shit and I avoid it whenever possible, but I still play some exclusives at 30fps because I have no other option.

He's obviously too stupid to see the nuance.

Here let me help you guys out.

You're welcome

No shade needed.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 225

User Lists: 0

#115  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17806 Posts

@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:

I always practice what I preach. I play FH3 on PC at 1440p/60fps+ and 2160p/60fps depending if I am playing on the monitor or TV. I only play exclusives on console and it sucks when they are limited to 30fps. It is so distracting, immersion breaking, and does not feel good.

No you don't and just proved it with your own post.

You preach 60fps FACT.

You own consoles and play 30fps games FACT.

You do NOT practise what you preach and are a hypocrite FACT.

Glad we could clear that up.

When have I ever said that I never play games at 30fps? 30fps is shit and I avoid it whenever possible, but I still play some exclusives at 30fps because I have no other option.

You simply don't get it, and you're meant to be a "master race" guy.

You preach that 60fps is the minimal standard in which games should be played at, and if that's your standard then you should not be playing games below (30fps) that standard, by doing so that makes you a hypocrite, because you don't practise what you preach, is that really too hard for you to understand?

I am a gamer first and foremost. So, I don't want to miss out on good games. There are some talented developers that are held hostage on shit platforms. I would prefer to play their games properly on a capable platform like PC, but that is not possible. When faced with playing a good exclusive at 30fps or not playing it at all, I will suck it up and play it at 30fps. That doesn't mean that the frame rate is not taking away my enjoyment of the game, but I am simply tolerating it out of necessity.

All games should be 60fps or higher and there should be no exclusives. All games should be available to everyone. People should be able to play them how they like without imposed restrictions and limitations.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@i_p_daily said:

Here let me help you guys out.

You're welcome

No shade needed.

As mentioned by @BassMan, we're gamers first and foremost and we preach supporting good games above all. Yes, even above 60fps. I'd rather play a good game at 30fps than a garbage game at 60fps. I'd rather play a good game at 60fps though but when it is not possible, I'll settle for 30fps. You call us PC Master Race as a way of poking fun of us but we both have a console and I even considered buying an X1X so clearly, the Master Race label is simply something we joke with and that console gamers have more of a problem with. We both support good games and the PC platform which is the platform of our choice. The shit I say on System Wars to annoy people doesn't impact what I do or purchase.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:

I always practice what I preach. I play FH3 on PC at 1440p/60fps+ and 2160p/60fps depending if I am playing on the monitor or TV. I only play exclusives on console and it sucks when they are limited to 30fps. It is so distracting, immersion breaking, and does not feel good.

No you don't and just proved it with your own post.

You preach 60fps FACT.

You own consoles and play 30fps games FACT.

You do NOT practise what you preach and are a hypocrite FACT.

Glad we could clear that up.

When have I ever said that I never play games at 30fps? 30fps is shit and I avoid it whenever possible, but I still play some exclusives at 30fps because I have no other option.

You simply don't get it, and you're meant to be a "master race" guy.

You preach that 60fps is the minimal standard in which games should be played at, and if that's your standard then you should not be playing games below (30fps) that standard, by doing so that makes you a hypocrite, because you don't practise what you preach, is that really too hard for you to understand?

I am a gamer first and foremost.

That sounds depressing! Husband? Father?

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#118 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@scatteh316 said:
@Pedro said:

What the cards you speak of on the list that is stronger than the 1070,1080 and 1080Ti. Because these three are non debatably faster.

As I've already stated.... Vega 56, Vega 64 and Vega 64LC.

Also the 1070ti...... And I would strongly argue the GTX1060 is 'generally' faster then Xbox X.

Then there's the Fury X cards........ which can also be argued are faster then X's 'RX580' level GPU.

So your claimed '3%' is way off.

Non of which are listed in the survey to which I was referencing and you were when you were stating I don't know numbers. All that work to be wrong is sad. :(

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#119  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@Pedro said:

You are free to think and have the right to feel that 30 fps is unplayable. There is nothing wrong with that but its not a factual statement but a personal stance on fps in games.

It is factual that it is game-breaking for a fighting game though. We're talking about a genre where 2-3 frames in a move/combo can completely alter the way a match is played. Some moves can be made completely ineffective by adding several frames to their lengths. Again as I said, 15fps is in practice very "playable" but where do we draw the line? Moves/set ups/combos can be broken at 30fps in a fighting game. That's where "unplayable" starts.

When its actually unplayable.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@Pedro said:

When its actually unplayable.

And when is that? 10fps? 12? We all have a different definition of unplayable.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#121 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@Pedro said:

When its actually unplayable.

And when is that? 10fps? 12? We all have a different definition of unplayable.

Not really. If something is unplayable it simply cannot be played. ;)

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@Pedro said:

Not really. If something is unplayable it simply cannot be played. ;)

Again depends for whom. Can you play games at 5fps? Because some people can.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@Pedro said:
@scatteh316 said:
@Pedro said:

What the cards you speak of on the list that is stronger than the 1070,1080 and 1080Ti. Because these three are non debatably faster.

As I've already stated.... Vega 56, Vega 64 and Vega 64LC.

Also the 1070ti...... And I would strongly argue the GTX1060 is 'generally' faster then Xbox X.

Then there's the Fury X cards........ which can also be argued are faster then X's 'RX580' level GPU.

So your claimed '3%' is way off.

Non of which are listed in the survey to which I was referencing and you were when you were stating I don't know numbers. All that work to be wrong is sad. :(

Let’s put it this way, only 2.5% own a GTX 1070, GTX 1080, or a 1080 Ti

And AMD would be lucky to sell half as many Vegas as those 3 Nvidia GPU’s

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#124 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@Pedro said:

Not really. If something is unplayable it simply cannot be played. ;)

Again depends for whom. Can you play games at 5fps? Because some people can.

I will concede that IF a game is designed to be played in a specific manner and the player is unable to play the game in such a manner that they cannot meet the design specs or cannot meet the gameplay goals it unplayable.

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#125 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:
@i_p_daily said:
@BassMan said:

I always practice what I preach. I play FH3 on PC at 1440p/60fps+ and 2160p/60fps depending if I am playing on the monitor or TV. I only play exclusives on console and it sucks when they are limited to 30fps. It is so distracting, immersion breaking, and does not feel good.

No you don't and just proved it with your own post.

You preach 60fps FACT.

You own consoles and play 30fps games FACT.

You do NOT practise what you preach and are a hypocrite FACT.

Glad we could clear that up.

When have I ever said that I never play games at 30fps? 30fps is shit and I avoid it whenever possible, but I still play some exclusives at 30fps because I have no other option.

You simply don't get it, and you're meant to be a "master race" guy.

You preach that 60fps is the minimal standard in which games should be played at, and if that's your standard then you should not be playing games below (30fps) that standard, by doing so that makes you a hypocrite, because you don't practise what you preach, is that really too hard for you to understand?

I am a gamer first and foremost. So, I don't want to miss out on good games. There are some talented developers that are held hostage on shit platforms. I would prefer to play their games properly on a capable platform like PC, but that is not possible. When faced with playing a good exclusive at 30fps or not playing it at all, I will suck it up and play it at 30fps. That doesn't mean that the frame rate is not taking away my enjoyment of the game, but I am simply tolerating it out of necessity.

All games should be 60fps or higher and there should be no exclusives. All games should be available to all and people should be able to play them how they like without imposed restrictions and limitations.

@Juub1990 said:
@i_p_daily said:

Here let me help you guys out.

You're welcome

No shade needed.

As mentioned by @BassMan, we're gamers first and foremost and we preach supporting good games above all. Yes, even above 60fps. I'd rather play a good game at 30fps than a garbage game at 60fps. I'd rather play a good game at 60fps though but when it is not possible, I'll settle for 30fps. You call us PC Master Race as a way of poking fun of us but we both have a console and I even considered buying an X1X so clearly, the Master Race label is simply something we joke with and that console gamers have more of a problem with. We both support good games and the PC platform which is the platform of our choice. The shit I say on System Wars to annoy people doesn't impact what I do or purchase.

Then stop preaching that under 60fps is unplayable and then turning around and playing 30fps games and you won't be called hypocrites, its really that simple :)

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#126  Edited By GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

@scatteh316 said:
@Pedro said:
@BassMan said:

@Pedro: Yes, 30fps is always shit. Especially for a racing game. Also, enough of your bullshit with percentages of PC users that have whatever hardware. It doesn't matter. The PC platform is capable of so much more than the consoles. It is up to each individual to decide how much they want to invest and what quality they want out if it.

Firstly in your opinion 30fps is shit and thats fine but don't state it as if its some indisputable rule. Bullshit percentage? Feel free to take a look at Steam hardware survey if you think its bullshit. Don't blame me for the reality of the situation blame yourself for ignoring it. To say it doesn't matter that a mere ~3% of steam users game on stronger hardware is to ignore the reality that the MAJORITY of PC gamers are gaming on hardware equal to significantly weaker hardware than consoles. Having potential is great but if the majority of the gamers on the platform is not gaming at said performance then it is incorrect to imply that the standard PC gaming performance is better than consoles.

That's 3% of 125,000,000 million accounts..... And by my counts it's above 3% as results for the 1070ti, Vega 56/64 and 64LC aren't exactly clear and present in the survey.

Heck the GTX1060 can be argued to be stronger then Xbox X and that has 14.61% install base.

That's a total of 17.58% which places total systems with a STEAM account that are on par or faster then Xbox X at 21.9 million - And that percentage isn't even for every GPU better then X's.

Even taking that low 3% average puts the number of PC's better then Xbox X at 3.75 million...... I'm betting Microsoft haven't even sold that many Xbox X's (And remember 1070ti and Vega percentages aren't included)

Quoting percentages instead of actual numbers is Ronbots trick.....

125,000,000 were the official active user account numbers from February 2015. Using Steamspy (as there are no newer official figures) there are approximately 280,000,000 steam users worldwide.

Estimated U.S. Steam users = 41,164,485 or 14.45% of the total number

Then using the Steam Survey, approximately 30% of people who participated are using a GPU more powerful than the PS4 Pro or in the region of 78,000,000 when scaled up to the estimated total number of users.

How many PS4 Pro's have been sold?

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12620 Posts
@i_p_daily said:

Then stop preaching that under 60fps is unplayable and then turning around and playing 30fps games and you won't be called hypocrites, its really that simple :)

You'd have a point if we had said that but we didn't. We said 30fps is crap and we stand by what we said. 30fps is unplayable in certain games such as fighting games. For a racing game 30fps is a no-go. I'd never support a racing game running at 30fps because to me it is unacceptable.

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@i_p_daily said:

Then stop preaching that under 60fps is unplayable and then turning around and playing 30fps games and you won't be called hypocrites, its really that simple :)

You'd have a point if we had said that but we didn't. We said 30fps is crap and we stand by what we said. 30fps is unplayable in certain games such as fighting games. For a racing game 30fps is a no-go. I'd never support a racing game running at 30fps because to me it is unacceptable.

Well I've played 200hrs of Forza Horizon 3 at 30fps and I can say its far from crap as you can get, but hey you guys do what you gotta do and i'll just enjoy the game.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@daredevils2k said:

Well duh Lemmings , you act as if lowering the graphics quality is a new thing . So what we’ve all learned is that the almighty Xb1x isn’t powerful enough to run the game at ultra , 4K @ 60fps

Neither is a 1070ti by DF’s own admission ?

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130  Edited By daredevils2k
Member since 2015 • 5001 Posts

@i_p_daily said:
@Juub1990 said:
@i_p_daily said:

Then stop preaching that under 60fps is unplayable and then turning around and playing 30fps games and you won't be called hypocrites, its really that simple :)

You'd have a point if we had said that but we didn't. We said 30fps is crap and we stand by what we said. 30fps is unplayable in certain games such as fighting games. For a racing game 30fps is a no-go. I'd never support a racing game running at 30fps because to me it is unacceptable.

Well I've played 200hrs of Forza Horizon 3 at 30fps and I can say its far from crap as you can get, but hey you guys do what you gotta do and i'll just enjoy the game.

Its got be really hard for lemmings making fun of sony 30fps racers like drive club, but defend it when it's their own being attacked for being 30fps. Watching IP lash out against 30fps racers in the past to now this " at 30fps and I can say its far from crap as you can get" is priceless. its like xmas in Jan :)

Avatar image for deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d

6278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#131 deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
Member since 2009 • 6278 Posts

@daredevils2k: Not as hard as comparing an open world game Vs a linear one.

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 daredevils2k
Member since 2015 • 5001 Posts

@phbz said:

@daredevils2k: Not as hard as comparing an open world game Vs a linear one.

OH wow their it is people, Lemmings are starting to admit that the almighty xb1x isn't as powerful as they thought it would be. Making up excuses for its failure doesn't look good :(

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133  Edited By GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@daredevils2k said:
@phbz said:

@daredevils2k: Not as hard as comparing an open world game Vs a linear one.

OH wow their it is people, Lemmings are starting to admit that the almighty xb1x isn't as powerful as they thought it would be. Making up excuses for its failure doesn't look good :(

Lol X1X performance has everyone pleasantly surprised. Give it a rest kid

Avatar image for scatteh316
scatteh316

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134  Edited By scatteh316
Member since 2004 • 10273 Posts

@Pedro said:
@scatteh316 said:
@Pedro said:

What the cards you speak of on the list that is stronger than the 1070,1080 and 1080Ti. Because these three are non debatably faster.

As I've already stated.... Vega 56, Vega 64 and Vega 64LC.

Also the 1070ti...... And I would strongly argue the GTX1060 is 'generally' faster then Xbox X.

Then there's the Fury X cards........ which can also be argued are faster then X's 'RX580' level GPU.

So your claimed '3%' is way off.

Non of which are listed in the survey to which I was referencing and you were when you were stating I don't know numbers. All that work to be wrong is sad. :(

Cut the back peddling.... you're more then clever enough to know that the cards listed in the survey are not all of the cards that are faster.

And now you're trying to flip it.

Even if you could cards like the 980ti and others your 3% is still wrong.

But keeping spinning to try get out of it.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#135 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@scatteh316 said:

Cut the back peddling.... you're more then clever enough to know that the cards listed in the survey are not all of the cards that are faster.

And now you're trying to flip it.

Even if you could cards like the 980ti and others your 3% is still wrong.

But keeping spinning to try get out of it.

You should be smart enough to know if someone is using a data source they reference the data source. You have no data to the contrary. Saying my numbers were incorrectly used based on the data source specifically reference was an error on your part. Now that you are wrong you are trying your best to save face.

Avatar image for scatteh316
scatteh316

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 scatteh316
Member since 2004 • 10273 Posts

@Pedro said:
@scatteh316 said:

Cut the back peddling.... you're more then clever enough to know that the cards listed in the survey are not all of the cards that are faster.

And now you're trying to flip it.

Even if you could cards like the 980ti and others your 3% is still wrong.

But keeping spinning to try get out of it.

You should be smart enough to know if someone is using a data source they reference the data source. You have no data to the contrary. Saying my numbers were incorrectly used based on the data source specifically reference was an error on your part. Now that you are wrong you are trying your best to save face.

Ahaha.... you're getting desparate now...... Maybe go have another look at the survey and come back to me after you've seen sense.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d

6278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#137  Edited By deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
Member since 2009 • 6278 Posts

@daredevils2k: Don't be silly (I know, kind of impossible in SW) I have no problems admitting the X is no miracle machine. I'm not the one setting Olympic records in mental gymnastics to justify my hate or insecurity over a toy. I just pointed out the obvious, an open world game can't be compared to a linear one. Just that.

I own all platforms but decided to abandon PC gaming almost completely for several reasons. But probably I've been playing and building PCs for longer than you've been alive.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#138 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

@Pedro said:
@scatteh316 said:

Cut the back peddling.... you're more then clever enough to know that the cards listed in the survey are not all of the cards that are faster.

And now you're trying to flip it.

Even if you could cards like the 980ti and others your 3% is still wrong.

But keeping spinning to try get out of it.

You should be smart enough to know if someone is using a data source they reference the data source. You have no data to the contrary. Saying my numbers were incorrectly used based on the data source specifically reference was an error on your part. Now that you are wrong you are trying your best to save face.

Let's say that to beat an X1X you need a GTX 1070 or more and that AMD cards can't be included, nor can the GTX 1070Ti and we completely ignore the CPU. Then going by the Steam survey you are correct that only 3.1% of participants have a GPU more powerful than that used in the X1X. How many of those have been sold? Going by Steam Stats (as demonstrated above) 3.1% scaled up to the total user base is 8.4 million.

However when you look at it factually and not in fantasy land where Forza Horizon 3 bench marks are the be all and end all of testing, There are many more GPU's missing to be taken in account and that includes the GTX 1060.

Another fun fact, there are an estimated 1.8 billion gamers on the planet, 1.2 billion of them are PC gamers. According to research carried out by the ESA anyway.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#139 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@GarGx1 said:

Let's say that to beat an X1X you need a GTX 1070 or more and that AMD cards can't be included, nor can the GTX 1070Ti and we completely ignore the CPU. Then going by the Steam survey you are correct that only 3.1% of participants have a GPU more powerful than that used in the X1X. How many of those have been sold? Going by Steam Stats (as demonstrated above) 3.1% scaled up to the total user base is 8.4 million.

However when you look at it factually and not in fantasy land where Forza Horizon 3 bench marks are the be all and end all of testing, There are many more GPU's missing to be taken in account and that includes the GTX 1060.

Another fun fact, there are an estimated 1.8 billion gamers on the planet, 1.2 billion of them are PC gamers. According to research carried out by the ESA anyway.

That's very interesting but has nothing to do with what you were replying to.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#140 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 69462 Posts

@scatteh316 said:

Ahaha.... you're getting desparate now...... Maybe go have another look at the survey and come back to me after you've seen sense.

None of what you just said changes that you were wrong and still wrong and trying to save face.

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 daredevils2k
Member since 2015 • 5001 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:
@daredevils2k said:
@phbz said:

@daredevils2k: Not as hard as comparing an open world game Vs a linear one.

OH wow their it is people, Lemmings are starting to admit that the almighty xb1x isn't as powerful as they thought it would be. Making up excuses for its failure doesn't look good :(

Lol X1X performance has everyone pleasantly surprised. Give it a rest kid

^^LOl you're so right bro :) I'm pleasantly surprised that the xb1x isn't powerful enough to run certain type of games that are meant to be 60fps and watching all the lems back peddle from making fun of 30fps racing games to WE LOVE 30 FPS RACING GAMES!!!!!

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@daredevils2k said:
@i_p_daily said:
@Juub1990 said:
@i_p_daily said:

Then stop preaching that under 60fps is unplayable and then turning around and playing 30fps games and you won't be called hypocrites, its really that simple :)

You'd have a point if we had said that but we didn't. We said 30fps is crap and we stand by what we said. 30fps is unplayable in certain games such as fighting games. For a racing game 30fps is a no-go. I'd never support a racing game running at 30fps because to me it is unacceptable.

Well I've played 200hrs of Forza Horizon 3 at 30fps and I can say its far from crap as you can get, but hey you guys do what you gotta do and i'll just enjoy the game.

Its got be really hard for lemmings making fun of sony 30fps racers like drive club, but defend it when it's their own being attacked for being 30fps. Watching IP lash out against 30fps racers in the past to now this " at 30fps and I can say its far from crap as you can get" is priceless. its like xmas in Jan :)

Find where I attacked Driveclub for being 30fps. We all know you're nothing but a liar, but lets see your proof, or will we see just more deflection from you.

You're just one of those people who constantly lose, and your only way to try and get a "win" is to fling as much shit at the wall and hope that something sticks but it never does lol.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143  Edited By GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@daredevils2k said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@daredevils2k said:
@phbz said:

@daredevils2k: Not as hard as comparing an open world game Vs a linear one.

OH wow their it is people, Lemmings are starting to admit that the almighty xb1x isn't as powerful as they thought it would be. Making up excuses for its failure doesn't look good :(

Lol X1X performance has everyone pleasantly surprised. Give it a rest kid

^^LOl you're so right bro :) I'm pleasantly surprised that the xb1x isn't powerful enough to run certain type of games that are meant to be 60fps and watching all the lems back peddle from making fun of 30fps racing games to WE LOVE 30 FPS RACING GAMES!!!!!

9 months into Xbox Ones release there were over 15 Nvidia GPU’s that performed better than Xbox One. (1-2 of those over $800)

6 months from now there will be 4-6 Nvidia GPU’s that perform better than X1X. (half being over $800 msrp)

I can’t remember a time when things were this close performance wise between Consoles and PC, original Xbox perhaps? All during a mid-gen update? Like I said, give it a rest kid

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#144  Edited By Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7702 Posts

@GioVela2010: 980ti, titans x/pascal/xp/V, 1070, 1070ti, 1080, 1080ti

Or do you mean 4-6 more?

And x360 was really giving top end pc's run for their money on launch, more so than One X

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145  Edited By GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@howmakewood said:

@GioVela2010: 980ti, titans x/pascal/xp/V, 1070, 1070ti, 1080, 1080ti

Or do you mean 4-6 more?

And x360 was really giving top end pc's run for their money on launch, more so than One X

Titan X, Titan Z, 980ti all dip below 27 FPS @4K with Witcher 3, and x1x still looks better

Avatar image for howmakewood
Howmakewood

7702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#146  Edited By Howmakewood
Member since 2015 • 7702 Posts

@GioVela2010: what ever you say, but all the cards I listed have have more grunt than One X even in reference models, not to mention good 3rd party 980ti has up to 30% headroom

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 225

User Lists: 0

#147  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17806 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:
@daredevils2k said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@daredevils2k said:

OH wow their it is people, Lemmings are starting to admit that the almighty xb1x isn't as powerful as they thought it would be. Making up excuses for its failure doesn't look good :(

Lol X1X performance has everyone pleasantly surprised. Give it a rest kid

^^LOl you're so right bro :) I'm pleasantly surprised that the xb1x isn't powerful enough to run certain type of games that are meant to be 60fps and watching all the lems back peddle from making fun of 30fps racing games to WE LOVE 30 FPS RACING GAMES!!!!!

9 months into Xbox Ones release there were over 15 Nvidia GPU’s that performed better than Xbox One. (1-2 of those over $800)

6 months from now there will be 4-6 Nvidia GPU’s that perform better than X1X. (half being over $800 msrp)

I can’t remember a time when things were this close performance wise between Consoles and PC, original Xbox perhaps? All during a mid-gen update? Like I said, give it a rest kid

The performance is not even close when you factor in the shit CPU that the X1X has. The thing struggles to run games at even 60fps. FH3@30fps... LMAO. Meanwhile.... PC gamers are gaming on high refresh rate monitors at high frame rates and soon the BFGD display that consoles won't be able to take advantage of. Let's not forget the existing TVs that can do 1080p/120hz that the consoles also can't take advantage of and PC can. So much fake 4K with these consoles and they still can't do 60fps. LOL.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#148 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

@Pedro said:
@GarGx1 said:

Let's say that to beat an X1X you need a GTX 1070 or more and that AMD cards can't be included, nor can the GTX 1070Ti and we completely ignore the CPU. Then going by the Steam survey you are correct that only 3.1% of participants have a GPU more powerful than that used in the X1X. How many of those have been sold? Going by Steam Stats (as demonstrated above) 3.1% scaled up to the total user base is 8.4 million.

However when you look at it factually and not in fantasy land where Forza Horizon 3 bench marks are the be all and end all of testing, There are many more GPU's missing to be taken in account and that includes the GTX 1060.

Another fun fact, there are an estimated 1.8 billion gamers on the planet, 1.2 billion of them are PC gamers. According to research carried out by the ESA anyway.

That's very interesting but has nothing to do with what you were replying to.

Really? I'll spell it out for you then, when you have ~280 million people using Steam, even a number as low as 3.1% is greater than the total number of Xbox One X's sold. Or in other words there are more PC gamers using more powerful hardware and that number increases dramatically as you move down the console power scale and take into account what is being used by the vast majority of console gamers, i.e. the PS4 and Xbox One.

Unless of course you can show that there are more than 8.4 million X1X's in use.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@BassMan said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@daredevils2k said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@daredevils2k said:

OH wow their it is people, Lemmings are starting to admit that the almighty xb1x isn't as powerful as they thought it would be. Making up excuses for its failure doesn't look good :(

Lol X1X performance has everyone pleasantly surprised. Give it a rest kid

^^LOl you're so right bro :) I'm pleasantly surprised that the xb1x isn't powerful enough to run certain type of games that are meant to be 60fps and watching all the lems back peddle from making fun of 30fps racing games to WE LOVE 30 FPS RACING GAMES!!!!!

9 months into Xbox Ones release there were over 15 Nvidia GPU’s that performed better than Xbox One. (1-2 of those over $800)

6 months from now there will be 4-6 Nvidia GPU’s that perform better than X1X. (half being over $800 msrp)

I can’t remember a time when things were this close performance wise between Consoles and PC, original Xbox perhaps? All during a mid-gen update? Like I said, give it a rest kid

The performance is not even close when you factor in the shit CPU that the X1X has. The thing struggles to run games at even 60fps. FH3@30fps... LMAO. Meanwhile.... PC gamers are gaming on high refresh rate monitors at high frame rates and soon the BFGD display that consoles won't be able to take advantage of. Let's not forget the existing TVs that can do 1080p/120hz that the consoles also can't take advantage of and PC can. So much fake 4K with these consoles and they still can't do 60fps. LOL.

Lol at comparing bullet points instead of actual game performance.

Nothing special about BFGD because they’re still LCD, and LCD is shit.

I believe 4K VRR OLeD’s release this year, And X1X is already VRR capable.

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 daredevils2k
Member since 2015 • 5001 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:
@BassMan said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@daredevils2k said:
@GioVela2010 said:

Lol X1X performance has everyone pleasantly surprised. Give it a rest kid

^^LOl you're so right bro :) I'm pleasantly surprised that the xb1x isn't powerful enough to run certain type of games that are meant to be 60fps and watching all the lems back peddle from making fun of 30fps racing games to WE LOVE 30 FPS RACING GAMES!!!!!

9 months into Xbox Ones release there were over 15 Nvidia GPU’s that performed better than Xbox One. (1-2 of those over $800)

6 months from now there will be 4-6 Nvidia GPU’s that perform better than X1X. (half being over $800 msrp)

I can’t remember a time when things were this close performance wise between Consoles and PC, original Xbox perhaps? All during a mid-gen update? Like I said, give it a rest kid

The performance is not even close when you factor in the shit CPU that the X1X has. The thing struggles to run games at even 60fps. FH3@30fps... LMAO. Meanwhile.... PC gamers are gaming on high refresh rate monitors at high frame rates and soon the BFGD display that consoles won't be able to take advantage of. Let's not forget the existing TVs that can do 1080p/120hz that the consoles also can't take advantage of and PC can. So much fake 4K with these consoles and they still can't do 60fps. LOL.

Lol at comparing bullet points instead of actual game performance.

Nothing special about BFGD because they’re still LCD, and LCD is shit.

I believe 4K VRR OLeD’s release this year, And X1X is already VRR capable.

I love how bassman spoke the truth , but u couldn't handle that the xb1x cpu problem is serious and at 500 is a waste of money.