@leicam6 said:
@ad1x2: That is a glorified blog and not a scientific source, so I am hesitant to take their word. NowThis website doesn’t need to “admit bias”, you can see bias and editorial slant by yourself by just looking through the website. And the website doesn’t seem any different than other similar leftwing internet-only sources for the social media age. Breitbart is a category all to itself.
Funnily enough that source also says Wikipedia is “Least Bias” and has highly factual reporting. Whereas you say they are “mostly liberal and aren’t going to say much negative about them either”. That’s quite a dilemma for you.
I think you're missing the point; NowThis caters to liberals, tells them what they want to hear, and skews what it presents.
Essentially everything is biased, the question is to what extent. NowThis is very left-leaning.
Additionally, it's not so much that they are telling you lies, but they are lying by omission; those people said what they said, but what did other people say that were not featured? It's easy to go out in the world and ask 100 people the same set of questions, and then choose to show the 20 that gave dumb answers instead of the 80 that gave halfway intelligent ones.
Stunts like this should be obvious to people with even a hint of intelligence or wisdom.
Log in to comment