https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-tweet-biden-doctored-video/
Seems the trump campaign is getting desperate. They definitely don't run on policy.
Should social media remove his fake tweets?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-tweet-biden-doctored-video/
Seems the trump campaign is getting desperate. They definitely don't run on policy.
Should social media remove his fake tweets?
They should definitely be marked as Twitter recently started doing.
Marked but do people even notice that? If you or I tweeted falsely then I imagine it would be removed.
They should definitely be marked as Twitter recently started doing.
Marked but do people even notice that? If you or I tweeted falsely then I imagine it would be removed.
Yeah it would. Hell copy Trump's twitter and you will get banned within a week I think.
I think the presidents tweets should remain, saved for the future, however perhaps locked so people can't retweet or comment on it. As a step up from simply marking it as fake.
Biden playing despacito off his phone was cringe
The NWA cut was much better.
https://twitter.com/TheUnitedSpot1/status/1306048702872612866?s=09
I like it 😆
If someone cant tell this is cut or cant take the time to look up the og clip then they deserve to think its real because they are complete morons lol
*manipulated media* gotta be kidding me, its a meme!!! Why don't these media outlets understand memes or jokes
Trump did Biden a favour with his joke because Biden’s pandering was downright cringeworthy. You think Biden’s heard of that song before his handlers put it on a phone?
https://youtu.be/OYl8s6pjrcI
Kind of goes with Hillary claiming she carries hot sauce in her purse, to Pete booty however his name is spelled drinking a 40 out of a brown paper bag, to AOCs "black talk." The patronizing is very cringe worthy.
Trump is fake news. It's funny how the right pretends that Biden is against cops when he helped write a 1994 crime bill you have to be a loser and a sucker to believe that Biden is anti-police.
Biden playing despacito off his phone was cringe
The NWA cut was much better.
If someone cant tell this is cut or cant take the time to look up the og clip then they deserve to think its real because they are complete morons lol
*manipulated media* gotta be kidding me, its a meme!!! Why don't these media outlets understand memes or jokes
It wasn't a meme and presidents shouldn't engage in trolling.
If your criticism against your opponent is that he's an old man making cringe gestures towards younger generations then I think you've lost
Twitter should start putting notifications for when Trump manages to Tweet something factually correct.
If you're an official of any kind and you post bullshit or lies, Twitter (and Facebook et al) that post needs to be deleted.
@LJS9502_basic: ‘presidents shouldn't engage in trolling’
I missed that part in the constitution.
It has to be in the constitution?
Yeah, the constitution says you don't have to be a good person, so you can go ahead and be a shitty human if you want. I mean it basically allows it, right?
/s
Yeah, the constitution says you don't have to be a good person, so you can go ahead and be a shitty human if you want. I mean it basically allows it, right?
/s
Didn't it also say all men are created equal?
Only full men. 3/5ths men and women didn't count.
Yeah, the constitution says you don't have to be a good person, so you can go ahead and be a shitty human if you want. I mean it basically allows it, right?
/s
Didn't it also say all men are created equal?
They didn't really mean it though. Most of them were slave owners at the time.
Yeah, the constitution says you don't have to be a good person, so you can go ahead and be a shitty human if you want. I mean it basically allows it, right?
/s
Didn't it also say all men are created equal?
They didn't really mean it though. Most of them were slave owners at the time.
If they had just put an asterisk next to it and a footnote, we could have avoided all this confusion.
Yeah, the constitution says you don't have to be a good person, so you can go ahead and be a shitty human if you want. I mean it basically allows it, right?
/s
Didn't it also say all men are created equal?
Only full men. 3/5ths men and women didn't count.
lol you're right. I totally forgot about that part.
If "tweeted manipulated media" is a sign that Trump is getting desperate, the guy has been desperate every week since he got into office.
This whole thing is a crapshoot at this point. Smart money is on Biden, but not by much. Heck, the Vegas betting odds are damn near even, and that's a reflection of where people who are actually willing to put money down on it are leaning, as opposed to partisan hacks proclaiming desperation in an internet forum. Anyone who is proclaiming that they're sure of this is likely trying to convince themselves more than you. I've been watching those odds and, surprisingly (I was surprised), they seem to be getting closer, not widening. I'll be especially curious to watch them the next few days after the debate.
I will say, for how much people like to proclaim landslide victories for either side, I'd be curious to see how many of them put money down on their supposed surefire predictions. I'm betting next to none, and that says a lot more about how they feel about it than their words do.
Yeah, the constitution says you don't have to be a good person, so you can go ahead and be a shitty human if you want. I mean it basically allows it, right?
/s
Didn't it also say all men are created equal?
They didn't really mean it though. Most of them were slave owners at the time.
Yeah, that's what I am saying. A slave is no man. :P
If they had just put an asterisk next to it and a footnote, we could have avoided all this confusion.
Yeah. It's their fault for not specifying what they meant by men.
Only full men. 3/5ths men and women didn't count.
Gotta love it that someone defined it.
Yeah, the constitution says you don't have to be a good person, so you can go ahead and be a shitty human if you want. I mean it basically allows it, right?
/s
Didn't it also say all men are created equal?
The phrase "all men are created equal" is in the Declaration of Independence, not the US Constitution.
@comeonman: Well that was forgotten in a few moments.
What was forgotten? The fact that it is not in the Constitution, but rather in the Declaration?
Or are you insinuating that the people and leaders of the USA forgot the ideal of all men being created equal a few moments after the Declaration of Independence was written?
@comeonman: Well that was forgotten in a few moments.
What was forgotten? The fact that it is not in the Constitution, but rather in the Declaration?
Or are you insinuating that the people and leaders of the USA forgot the ideal of all men being created equal a few moments after the Declaration of Independence was written?
I'm saying it got lost in translation from idea to practice.
That's hilarious. Still won't top the CNN wrestling gif he retweeted.
That only appeals to the basest most simple of people.
Let me know when you find multi-layered memes! Imgur/twitter/tiktok can only be entertaining for so long, especially when gems like the CNN tweet triggered so many. Always have to be looking for more avenues of entertainment.
@comeonman: Well that was forgotten in a few moments.
What was forgotten? The fact that it is not in the Constitution, but rather in the Declaration?
Or are you insinuating that the people and leaders of the USA forgot the ideal of all men being created equal a few moments after the Declaration of Independence was written?
I'm saying it got lost in translation from idea to practice.
The definition, or meaning, of the phrase "all men are created equal" was entirely different in the late 18th century than it is now, almost 250 years later. Human society has evolved, and continues to evolve. When those words were written, the vast majority of people in the world lived under tyranny, and slavery was practiced across the globe. What the founders of the USA put in place with the constitution was a system of laws and governance that was a huge step forward in the evolution of individual liberty and self-governance in human society.
Did the US Constitution immediately result in a society of equal rights for all, as we would define it today? Of course not. To expect that the founders could have made such a quantum leap in societal norms of equality and justice betrays either an ignorance of history, or an arrogance born from a sense of moral superiority that is completely unjustified.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment