Those pro-life republicans

  • 154 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
#101 Posted by LJS9502_basic (166353 posts) -

@Nuck81 said:

@nintendoboy16: conservative are so pro life they are willing to murder women to stop abortion.

Yeah that was the thing that stuck out to me...........

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#102 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@Vaasman said:
@Chutebox said:
@Vaasman said:

Except it doesn't, none of them are properly formed, and are too underdeveloped to even live, were it to be born prematurely. It doesn't even have motor or nerve function at that stage.

It doesn't? I suggest you actually look into what you're talking about.

Yea I'm looking at a parasitic nubbin monster, what's the confusion?

Parasitism

Interaction between two organisms living together in more or less intimate association in a relationship in which association is disadvantageous or destructive to one of the organisms

In what shape or form is a baby considered a parasite?

https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/
Only 7% of abortions occur because of physical/fetal health problems. The term "health" is also defined as trauma, which can be described as pretty much anything. So the amount of ACTUAL health problems is even lower. If the baby was a parasite, women would be dropping like flies due to pregnancy. But they are not.

30 IQ logic at best. Absolute idiocy.

Avatar image for horgen
#103 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@br0kenrabbit: @plageus900: @ronvalencia: Given that I can't find anything that supports hicks equal to terrorists, pedophiles, rapists etc, I'm deleting that line from the OP. Sorry for such delayed action.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#104 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@nintendoboy16 said:

I don't care. Nothing justifies taking away rights. NOTHING! It's sad that the idea of killing people you disagree with is becoming more accepted in this society.

I guess the right to life for a fetus does not matter to you. Considering the overwhelming majority of abortions occur because of life choices, not health complications.

Make an amazing scenery and hang the mf'ers. I would prefer a good ole firing squad. :D

Every. single. one.

EDIT: I would like to clarify for the many snowflakes who may be offended by this statement . Approximately 90% of those who commit abortion do because of lack of responsibility, while less than 10% of abortions is due to medical condition/rape. So for those 90% that do... Classify abortion w/o a medical condition as murder and send them all to the gallows :D The world is overpopulated anyways, as you lefties love saying.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
#105 Posted by Stevo_the_gamer (45137 posts) -

This seems so patently dumb that it borders on onion like quality.

Avatar image for Vaasman
#106 Posted by Vaasman (13638 posts) -
@nattydaddy604 said:
@Vaasman said:

Yea I'm looking at a parasitic nubbin monster, what's the confusion?

Parasitism

Interaction between two organisms living together in more or less intimate association in a relationship in which association is disadvantageous or destructive to one of the organisms

In what shape or form is a baby considered a parasite?

https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

Only 7% of abortions occur because of physical/fetal health problems. The term "health" is also defined as trauma, which can be described as pretty much anything. So the amount of ACTUAL health problems is even lower. If the baby was a parasite, women would be dropping like flies due to pregnancy. But they are not.

30 IQ logic at best. Absolute idiocy.

Taking a facetious comment out of context and extremely literally? I suppose I shouldn't expect any better from the resident komrade of the board.

Avatar image for horgen
#107 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:
@Vaasman said:
@Chutebox said:
@Vaasman said:

Except it doesn't, none of them are properly formed, and are too underdeveloped to even live, were it to be born prematurely. It doesn't even have motor or nerve function at that stage.

It doesn't? I suggest you actually look into what you're talking about.

Yea I'm looking at a parasitic nubbin monster, what's the confusion?

Parasitism

Interaction between two organisms living together in more or less intimate association in a relationship in which association is disadvantageous or destructive to one of the organisms

In what shape or form is a baby considered a parasite?

https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

Only 7% of abortions occur because of physical/fetal health problems. The term "health" is also defined as trauma, which can be described as pretty much anything. So the amount of ACTUAL health problems is even lower. If the baby was a parasite, women would be dropping like flies due to pregnancy. But they are not.

30 IQ logic at best. Absolute idiocy.

A successful parasite doesn't kill its host. I believe that is taught first year in biology.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#108 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@horgen said:
@nattydaddy604 said:
@Vaasman said:
@Chutebox said:
@Vaasman said:

Except it doesn't, none of them are properly formed, and are too underdeveloped to even live, were it to be born prematurely. It doesn't even have motor or nerve function at that stage.

It doesn't? I suggest you actually look into what you're talking about.

Yea I'm looking at a parasitic nubbin monster, what's the confusion?

Parasitism

Interaction between two organisms living together in more or less intimate association in a relationship in which association is disadvantageous or destructive to one of the organisms

In what shape or form is a baby considered a parasite?

https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

Only 7% of abortions occur because of physical/fetal health problems. The term "health" is also defined as trauma, which can be described as pretty much anything. So the amount of ACTUAL health problems is even lower. If the baby was a parasite, women would be dropping like flies due to pregnancy. But they are not.

30 IQ logic at best. Absolute idiocy.

A successful parasite doesn't kill its host. I believe that is taught first year in biology.

Demonstrate to me the mother is at a disadvantage with a baby the same way she is with a tapeworm. I'll wait.

And no, the anomaly does not count.

Avatar image for horgen
#109 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:

Demonstrate to me the mother is at a disadvantage with a baby the same way she is with a tapeworm. I'll wait.

And no, the anomaly does not count.

It was never my intention, but rather to enlighten about what is considered a successful parasite since the definition of parasites came up.

Trying to demonstrate the similarities would be pointless. You will never accept them. Still, some I can think of right away are both get the nutrition they need from their host, as well as leaving the host to deal with the waste. Both generally create discomfort for the host.

Even for a healthy woman, being pregnant limits what one should do. I won't claim they are exactly the same, but given your post I think you have very little knowledge about pregnancy and even less about parasites.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#110 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@horgen said:

It was never my intention, but rather to enlighten about what is considered a successful parasite since the definition of parasites came up.

Trying to demonstrate the similarities would be pointless. You will never accept them. Still, some I can think of right away are both get the nutrition they need from their host, as well as leaving the host to deal with the waste. Both generally create discomfort for the host.

Even for a healthy woman, being pregnant limits what one should do. I won't claim they are exactly the same, but given your post I think you have very little knowledge about pregnancy and even less about parasites.

>Claims he wants to provide "enlightenment"
>Does not provide any "enlightenment" because I will never accept them.
Typical leftist logic.

  1. A parasite is an organism of onespecies that lives in or on an organism of anotherspecies and receives nourishment from the host.
  2. Parasites are invasive organism that come from an outside or external source. A fetus comes from an inside or internal source (ie fertilized egg)
  3. Parasites are generally harmful to the hosts, fetuses may make a pregnant woman experience adverse health effects, but not nearly to the same level that a parasite generally does.
  4. A parasite makes directcontact with the host's living tissues. A fetus lives in the placenta, fed by the umbilical cord, both of which are fetal tissue (ie the cells come from the baby).
  5. When a parasite invades a host, the host tissue will usually respond by encapsulating the parasite in order tocut it offfrom other surrounding tissue. In the case of a fetus, the mother’s tissue will create a lining tissue that connects, rather than cuts off contact with other tissues (placenta lining).
  6. Parasites usually elicit asurge of antibodies as an immunological response. With the fetus, however, a mother’s trophoblast (the shell of cells surrounding the embryo) will naturally block these antibodies so as not to reject the fetus. This reaction is only found in the embryo-mother relationship.
  7. A parasite will generally weaken the cellular reproductive capacity of the host.For a fetus, the effect is the opposite.
  8. Parasites generallystay with the host for life, a fetus leaves upon birth.
  9. Parasitical relationships are mostlyharmful and unnecessary to the host, generally damaging the host in a variety of ways. A newborn (fetus post-birth) is very healthy for the mother, bringing benefits of an emotional, cognitive and chemical nature.
  10. The most obvious one, a fetus is a human being in development. It will never become anything other than human. Even a first trimester fetus will have fully developed arms, legs, ears, facial features, sex organs and a functioning heart, as well as sufficient neurological development to feel pain. A parasite is not a human and never will be.

Sounds like a symbiotic relationship to me.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#111 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:
@horgen said:

It was never my intention, but rather to enlighten about what is considered a successful parasite since the definition of parasites came up.

Trying to demonstrate the similarities would be pointless. You will never accept them. Still, some I can think of right away are both get the nutrition they need from their host, as well as leaving the host to deal with the waste. Both generally create discomfort for the host.

Even for a healthy woman, being pregnant limits what one should do. I won't claim they are exactly the same, but given your post I think you have very little knowledge about pregnancy and even less about parasites.

>Claims he wants to provide "enlightenment"

>Does not provide any "enlightenment" because I will never accept them.


Sounds like a symbiotic relationship to me.

Parasitism is a symbiotic relationship

Avatar image for Treflis
#112 Edited by Treflis (13620 posts) -

Abortions have and will always happen, the difference is that we are now able to do it in a clinical and safe manner rather then in some hidden backroom with a coat hanger.

And I for one think the clinical and safer option is the best. Also if other people wish to terminate a unwanted fetus then it matters very little in my life, It's remarkable that it seems to do in the lives of some of you.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#113 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@horgen said:

I'm deleting that line from the OP. Sorry for such delayed action.

what's the rules for calls for violence?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#114 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -
@drlostrib said:

Parasitism is a symbiotic relationship

You are right. The correct answer is a mutualistic or commensalitic symbiotic relationship, not parasitic. My point still stands.

Avatar image for horgen
#115 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@nattydaddy604: Are you still claiming there are no similarities between them?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#116 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@horgen: Are you still replying without posting any substance refuting my claims?

Avatar image for horgen
#117 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:

@horgen: Are you still replying without posting any substance refuting my claims?

My "enlightenment" claim was regarding how one can view parasites and what counts as successful. If a parasite kills it host in 24 hours from entering the host, it has 24 hours to infect another host. If parasite B uses 15 years, it has 15 years to infect others. In terms of surviving, parasite B will do much better.

Regarding similarity between parasites and fetus is from who they get their nutrition to survive and grow. The abundance of other differences do not take away this similarity.

@drlostrib said:
@horgen said:

I'm deleting that line from the OP. Sorry for such delayed action.

what's the rules for calls for violence?

Those go quickly beyond mods territory. Referring to news and what a public person have said is generally viewed as OK, it's part of a discussion, though using it to threaten other users quickly results in a ban.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#118 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@horgen said:

@drlostrib said:
@horgen said:

I'm deleting that line from the OP. Sorry for such delayed action.

what's the rules for calls for violence?

Those go quickly beyond mods territory. Referring to news and what a public person have said is generally viewed as OK, it's part of a discussion, though using it to threaten other users quickly results in a ban.

So for example, what about calling for people to be hanged or shot for having (or performing) a legal medical procedure? where would that fall?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#119 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -
@horgen said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

@horgen: Are you still replying without posting any substance refuting my claims?

My "enlightenment" claim was regarding how one can view parasites and what counts as successful. If a parasite kills it host in 24 hours from entering the host, it has 24 hours to infect another host. If parasite B uses 15 years, it has 15 years to infect others. In terms of surviving, parasite B will do much better.

Regarding similarity between parasites and fetus is from who they get their nutrition to survive and grow. The abundance of other differences do not take away this similarity.

Sorry dude, one of the main classifications of a parasite is one that is from outside of the host that attaches to it. A fetus is developed from the body, not from outside.

Sure their are similarities, does not mean its a parasite. You are comparing symptoms and then using that to say a fetus could be a parasite. You are cherry picking to strengthen your argument.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#120 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -

Really getting worked up about biological definitions over a comment that uses the term "nubbin monster"

Avatar image for Lach0121
#121 Edited by Lach0121 (11391 posts) -

@OP

Those extreme anti-choice views are becoming more, and more typical where I live. Perfect example of why I can't wait to get out of the south.

I have nothing but disrespect for Theocrats, and the fools who support them.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#122 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib: Cannot provide a logical counter argument, resorts to useless comment. Come again next time.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#123 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib said:

So for example, what about calling for people to be hanged or shot for having (or performing) a legal medical procedure? where would that fall?

Never called for a particular person to be shot or hung. Simply stated an opinion on what should be done to mothers who murder there unborn children. Nice try little snowflake. You done losing?

Avatar image for drlostrib
#124 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:

Cannot provide a logical counter argument, resorts to useless comment.

Well, at least you're self aware of your own posting style

Avatar image for drlostrib
#125 Edited by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:

So for example, what about calling for people to be hanged or shot for having (or performing) a legal medical procedure? where would that fall?

Never called for a particular person to be shot or hung. Simply stated an opinion on what should be done to mothers who murder there unborn children. Nice try little snowflake. You done losing?

don't really care about your opinion on the matter

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#126 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

Cannot provide a logical counter argument, resorts to useless comment.

Well, at least you're self aware of your own posting style

Hilarious comeback. I almost forgot to crack a smile. Try providing substance to a conversation, rather than a low IQ comment.

don't really care about your opinion on the matter

Yet you are trying to get somebody censored with a different opinion. Well done keyboard warrior. Stick to the internet, real life is too much for you.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
#127 Posted by LJS9502_basic (166353 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

Cannot provide a logical counter argument, resorts to useless comment.

Well, at least you're self aware of your own posting style

Hilarious comeback. I almost forgot to crack a smile. Try providing substance to a conversation, rather than a low IQ comment.

don't really care about your opinion on the matter

Yet you are trying to get somebody censored with a different opinion. Well done keyboard warrior. Stick to the internet, real life is too much for you.

Ironically you might take your own advice.........

Avatar image for Nuck81
#128 Posted by Nuck81 (7435 posts) -

@nattydaddy604: this new alt isn't working well for you

Avatar image for drlostrib
#129 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

Cannot provide a logical counter argument, resorts to useless comment.

Well, at least you're self aware of your own posting style

Hilarious comeback. I almost forgot to crack a smile. Try providing substance to a conversation, rather than a low IQ comment.

don't really care about your opinion on the matter

Yet you are trying to get somebody censored with a different opinion. Well done keyboard warrior. Stick to the internet, real life is too much for you.

lol, okay

is that the best you got?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#130 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@LJS9502_basic said:

Yet you are trying to get somebody censored with a different opinion. Well done keyboard warrior. Stick to the internet, real life is too much for you.

Ironically you might take your own advice.........

Not trying to censor anybody. I believe all speech (excluding calls to acts of violence) is free speech, including hate speech. As the supreme court of decided on numerous occasions. No irony there.

Smoked you in countless debates, to the point you squawk like a typical parrot

Offered to debate you numerous times in real life, and you have never accepted. No irony there.

That's 3 L's you just took on top of the numerous beat downs I have previously given you. 166k posts and counting, and still no detected levels of IQ surpassing 50

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#131 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@Nuck81 said:

@nattydaddy604: this new alt isn't working well for you

Low IQ Troll detected.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
#132 Posted by LJS9502_basic (166353 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

Yet you are trying to get somebody censored with a different opinion. Well done keyboard warrior. Stick to the internet, real life is too much for you.

Ironically you might take your own advice.........

Not trying to censor anybody, No irony there.

Smoked you in countless debates, to the point you squawk like a typical parrot

Offered to debate you numerous times in real life, and you have never accepted. No irony there.

That's 3 L's you just took on top of the numerous beat downs I have previously given you. 166k posts and counting, and still no detected levels of IQ surpassing 50

You haven't smoked me in any debate nor have you smoked anyone else. Insulting people and stating an opinion do not count as smoking.

Also my comment wasn't about the censoring part of your quote. Read your quote over and see if you can figure it out.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#133 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@LJS9502_basic said:
@nattydaddy604 said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

Yet you are trying to get somebody censored with a different opinion. Well done keyboard warrior. Stick to the internet, real life is too much for you.

Ironically you might take your own advice.........

Not trying to censor anybody, No irony there.

Smoked you in countless debates, to the point you squawk like a typical parrot

Offered to debate you numerous times in real life, and you have never accepted. No irony there.

That's 3 L's you just took on top of the numerous beat downs I have previously given you. 166k posts and counting, and still no detected levels of IQ surpassing 50

You haven't smoked me in any debate nor have you smoked anyone else. Insulting people and stating an opinion do not count as smoking.

Also my comment wasn't about the censoring part of your quote. Read your quote over and see if you can figure it out.

Yeah yeah yeah, you have used this tactic numerous times now. Play the victim card when your 30 IQ logic does not work. It's laughable at this point.

Last time I checked, you just injected yourself into a comment that had nothing to do with you. Stop commenting. You have nothing better to do with your life so you throw shade over the internet, most likely because you are a coward to do it in a face to face manner.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#134 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@nattydaddy604 said:

30 IQ logic at best.

@nattydaddy604 said:

a low IQ comment.

@nattydaddy604 said:

Low IQ Troll detected.

@nattydaddy604 said:

and still no detected levels of IQ surpassing 50

@nattydaddy604 said:

Play the victim card when your 30 IQ logic does not work.

Seems someone is stuck in a rut

Avatar image for horgen
#135 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:

Sorry dude, one of the main classifications of a parasite is one that is from outside of the host that attaches to it. A fetus is developed from the body, not from outside.

Sure their are similarities, does not mean its a parasite. You are comparing symptoms and then using that to say a fetus could be a parasite. You are cherry picking to strengthen your argument.

It's enough for those doesn't want a baby to call it a parasite nubbin monster... :P

Avatar image for horgen
#136 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@drlostrib said:
@horgen said:
@drlostrib said:
@horgen said:

I'm deleting that line from the OP. Sorry for such delayed action.

what's the rules for calls for violence?

Those go quickly beyond mods territory. Referring to news and what a public person have said is generally viewed as OK, it's part of a discussion, though using it to threaten other users quickly results in a ban.

So for example, what about calling for people to be hanged or shot for having (or performing) a legal medical procedure? where would that fall?

Hate speech is a moddable offense. From the Code of Conduct

Including but not limited to hateful, personal attacks against other members, sexism, racism, slurs or similar statements. Ad hominem and other distracting attacks do not add anything to the conversation. When our digital pride is on the line, emotions can run high.

Topics, Posts and Comments: Posts that are inappropriate, profane, vulgar, offensive, false, disparaging, defamatory, obscene, illegal, sexually explicit, racist, promotes violence, racial hatred, or terrorism, or are otherwise deemed, in our sole discretion, to be otherwise objectionable are subject to moderation.

Any thread in particular you are talking about?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#137 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

30 IQ logic at best.

@nattydaddy604 said:

a low IQ comment.

@nattydaddy604 said:

Low IQ Troll detected.

@nattydaddy604 said:

and still no detected levels of IQ surpassing 50

@nattydaddy604 said:

Play the victim card when your 30 IQ logic does not work.

Seems someone is stuck in a rut

This is hilarious. Incapable of an intellectual debate, you resort to trolling. Unlike you, all my (well deserved) comments were in response to a genuine low IQ rebuttal.
It is sad to see a human such as yourself stealing food, water, and air from someone else that could be a more productive member of society. A true shame.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#138 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@horgen said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

Sorry dude, one of the main classifications of a parasite is one that is from outside of the host that attaches to it. A fetus is developed from the body, not from outside.

Sure their are similarities, does not mean its a parasite. You are comparing symptoms and then using that to say a fetus could be a parasite. You are cherry picking to strengthen your argument.

It's enough for those doesn't want a baby to call it a parasite nubbin monster... :P

You can call it whatever your heart desires, does not make it true. It also does not change how approximately 90% of abortions are due to irresponsible life choices. These people are willingly destroying life because of non medical/non life threatening conditions. They deserve capital punishment.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#139 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

30 IQ logic at best.

@nattydaddy604 said:

a low IQ comment.

@nattydaddy604 said:

Low IQ Troll detected.

@nattydaddy604 said:

and still no detected levels of IQ surpassing 50

@nattydaddy604 said:

Play the victim card when your 30 IQ logic does not work.

Seems someone is stuck in a rut

This is hilarious. Incapable of an intellectual debate, you resort to trolling. Unlike you, all my (well deserved) comments were in response to a genuine low IQ rebuttal.

It is sad to see a human such as yourself stealing food, water, and air from someone else that could be a more productive member of society. A true shame.

I was just pointing out that you seem to be a little stuck on one thing

And based on these types of comments, why would anyone want to engage with you in any sort of discussion?

Avatar image for drlostrib
#140 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -

@horgen said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

Sorry dude, one of the main classifications of a parasite is one that is from outside of the host that attaches to it. A fetus is developed from the body, not from outside.

Sure their are similarities, does not mean its a parasite. You are comparing symptoms and then using that to say a fetus could be a parasite. You are cherry picking to strengthen your argument.

It's enough for those doesn't want a baby to call it a parasite nubbin monster... :P

but what's the biological definition of "nubbin monster"? That should be the real issue here

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#141 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib said:

I was just pointing out that you seem to be a little stuck on one thing

And based on these types of comments, why would anyone want to engage with you in any sort of discussion?

Because children like you attempt to:
1. Refute my claims, and fail miserably
2. Resort to comments directed at me personally, and fail miserably when I do it better

Typical Victim/Leftist(Tomato,tomahtoh, same thing ;) ) mentality

Avatar image for drlostrib
#142 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:

I was just pointing out that you seem to be a little stuck on one thing

And based on these types of comments, why would anyone want to engage with you in any sort of discussion?

Because children like you attempt to:

1. Refute my claims, and fail miserably

2. Resort to comments directed at me personally, and fail miserably when I do it better

Typical Victim/Leftist(Tomato,tomahtoh, same thing ;) ) mentality

Man, you have a pretty skewed view of things

best of luck with that

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#143 Posted by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib: Over twelve comments on this thread and not a single one in regards to this topic or refuting a claim I made.
Class A clown.

Avatar image for drlostrib
#144 Posted by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@nattydaddy604 said:

@drlostrib: Over twelve comments on this thread and not a single one in regards to this topic or refuting a claim I made.

Class A clown.

I see my point still stands

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#145 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

@drlostrib: Over twelve comments on this thread and not a single one in regards to this topic or refuting a claim I made.

Class A clown.

I see my point still stands

Low IQ comment

Avatar image for drlostrib
#146 Edited by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -

@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

@drlostrib: Over twelve comments on this thread and not a single one in regards to this topic or refuting a claim I made.

Class A clown.

I see my point still stands

Low IQ comment

When you spam that so many times in one page it kind of loses any potency.

Work on some new material, dude

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
#147 Edited by NattyDaddy604 (304 posts) -

@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

@drlostrib: Over twelve comments on this thread and not a single one in regards to this topic or refuting a claim I made.

Class A clown.

I see my point still stands

Low IQ comment

When you spam that so many times in one page it kind of loses any potency.

Work on some new material, dude

Took you a while to come up with that. I see it's trend of Low IQ comments and ability

Avatar image for drlostrib
#148 Edited by DrLostRib (4772 posts) -
@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:
@drlostrib said:

I see my point still stands

Low IQ comment

When you spam that so many times in one page it kind of loses any potency.

Work on some new material, dude

Took you a while to come up with that. I see it's trend of Low IQ comments and ability

Avatar image for horgen
#149 Posted by Horgen (120157 posts) -

@drlostrib said:
@horgen said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

Sorry dude, one of the main classifications of a parasite is one that is from outside of the host that attaches to it. A fetus is developed from the body, not from outside.

Sure their are similarities, does not mean its a parasite. You are comparing symptoms and then using that to say a fetus could be a parasite. You are cherry picking to strengthen your argument.

It's enough for those doesn't want a baby to call it a parasite nubbin monster... :P

but what's the biological definition of "nubbin monster"? That should be the real issue here

Cute but sucks your wallet dry?

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
#150 Edited by blaznwiipspman1 (7182 posts) -

@Chutebox: murder is a social term. It refers to taking the life of a fully independent person that is out of the womb. There's also different levels of acceptance of murder. Killing an enemy soldier isn't murder for example. A car accident isn't murder either. Killing and eating animals is also not considered murder, though technically you're taking a life.

A fetus, isn't a human, and you can't call it murder until it becomes a human. Until it's able to live and breath on it's own, able to think, feel above a primitive level, it's not a human either. That's the same justification for killing animals, that they're lower intelligence. Animals are smarter than fetuses but we have no problems killing animals.