I know people as individuals can do a lot, and I know a lot of people do some stuff already, but honestly I think it's up to business and the private sector to make the big, lasting changes. They contribute so much crap into the environment it dwarfs what the general public contributes.
I think if we started seeing the government lead the charge by creating new regulations, and then corporations taking up that mantle as leaders in the fight for the planet, then you'd see people start to follow suit. I still think electric vehicles or vehicles that run on fuel from renewable sources are a good start; if we could get 90% of the cars out there converted into vehicles that don't pollute, that'd be a start. I don't think that's too crazy an idea, either. You c an make some pretty hot electric vehicles, just look at some of the stuff Audi, Porsche, and Tesla are coming up with. If you want to spend 150k USD on a car that can go 0-60 mph in 2.5 seconds, you can spend it on an electric car if you want.
I don't think people mind sacrifice that much, what they don't like is inconvenience. I would happily give up my truck that gets 10 miles per gallon if I got a free electric car in return (or only had to pay 10% of it); it would not be as fun to drive, probably would not be as comfortable, wouldn't go as fast, and I probably would not like it as much--all sacrifices I'd have to give up--but it would not be an inconvenience.
@HoolaHoopMan said:
Eat less meat, live in a smaller home. Apartments and denser living arrangements help when compared to a larger house. The cubic volume to heat or cool it is far less. Like you mentioned, phasing out older devices and chemicals over time needs to be instituted. Everyone always balks at the idea but I still think we need to think about eating for 'bugs'. They're healthy, lean, and less resource intensive to farm. But that is a hard thing to sell people.
My friend did a report on that for his doctorate, it's pretty crazy how much protein you can get from bugs. I think cows are like 1 lb of product for 10 pounds of feed, chickens are 3 lb, but insects are like 9 lb of protein for 10 lb of feed, they're that efficient.
Furthermore they can be processed into meal and formed into protein bars, meat-substitutes, and they are far more easily digested than red meat, pork, and poultry.
I don't know if I could straight-up eat a bug, you know like a big bulbous abdomen that pops in your mouth when you bite into it, but I could certainly eat a product made from bugs.
@heirren said:
@sonicare:
No, they really dont. People say one thing but do another.
Fair enough, but the question is if people could do more--i.e. they weren't limited by financial restrictions, maybe even they were rewarded for their efforts--would they?
I think yes.
If owned a house and was told that there is a program in place that would buy my solar panels for me, but I had to give my excess energy back into the grid for free in return, I'd sign up for that in a heartbeat. If I collected grey water, and there was a program in place that said for every ten gallons I put back into the watershed I get a credit for such-and-such, that'd be cool. If
Log in to comment