Reporter Amy Robach states in leaked video ABC killed Epstein story three years ago due to political pressure

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

7839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 7839 Posts

In the video published by Project Veritas, ABC reporter Amy Robach appears to be speaking off the record that they had a lot of evidence of Epstein's crimes and had convinced one of his alleged victims to come out of hiding to speak on the incidents. She appears frustrated over the story being killed over some of the people allegedly involved with it.

“I tried for three years to get it on, to no avail, and now it’s all coming out. And it’s like these new revelations and I freaking had all of it. I am so pissed right now. … What we had was unreal.”

Amy Robach

Later in the video, she mentions that the palace (presumably Buckingham) threatened them "in a million different ways" when they discovered some of the allegations mentioned Prince Andrew. Near the end of it, she states that she believes without a doubt that Epstein was murdered in prison.

According to the Washington Post, ABC tried to explain their reasoning for not reporting it:

“At the time, not all of our reporting met our standards to air, but we have never stopped investigating the story. Ever since we’ve had a team on this investigation and substantial resources dedicated to it. That work has led to a two-hour documentary and 6-part podcast that will air in the new year.”

What do you think? As far as I'm concerned, whoever was involved with it needs to go to jail regardless of their political party.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

12148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 12148 Posts

Everybody knows abc is owned by the democratic party. We should be impeacing them instead of our hero Trump.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

2666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#3 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 2666 Posts

@n64dd: Especially since the Clinton's are heavily involved.

Avatar image for jeezers
jeezers

3547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 jeezers
Member since 2007 • 3547 Posts

@ad1x2: ayyyyye i was going to make a thread on this, you beat me to it.

yeah ABC looks really bad, they are just trying to ignore it.

But lets be real, not really surprised at all by any of this. People with even an ounce of skepticism could see there were people trying to sweep Epstein and his child sex ring island under the rug.

Remember the thread here when he died lol...

The Epstein memes have been a beautiful thing to witness, its throwing it back out there since the media seems to not want to mention it. Because regardless of where you lean politically, this whole story has smelt bad. from how the media brushed it off, didn't question his death, and while knowing he has had connections to some of the most powerful people in the world. Security should have been on high alert with this guy.

instead we got malfunctioned cameras, sleeping security guards, and a story that says a 6 foot 2 man hung himself from a 5 foot bunk bed.

yeah this stinks to high heaven and even the average joe knows it.

Avatar image for jeezers
jeezers

3547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 jeezers
Member since 2007 • 3547 Posts

God Bless meme culture

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

12148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 12148 Posts

There should be a criminal investigation into the clintons over their murder of him.

Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

4139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Sevenizz
Member since 2010 • 4139 Posts

And the mainstream media wonders why millions of us call them ‘fake news’.

Most of them haven’t even reported on this and it’s probably the scoop of the year. PV deserves a Pulitzer - but we all know that can’t happen.

Oh, and this...

https://www.businessinsider.com/cbs-fires-staffer-abc-amy-robach-leaked-epstein-comments-2019-11

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

34199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 34199 Posts

Avatar image for Nuck81
Nuck81

7872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 Nuck81
Member since 2005 • 7872 Posts

Trump should thank the media for dropping the story after he killed Epstein

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

19835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#10 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 19835 Posts

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@jeezers: Yeah, the memes about it has been all over the place lately.

It makes sense why he would want to commit suicide, but shit like sleeping guards and malfunctioning cameras should have resulted in loads of extra work for the company to make sure this does not happen again. And an investigation into why it happened.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

36002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 36002 Posts

money is the cheat code in life

Avatar image for watercrack445
watercrack445

2076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#13  Edited By watercrack445
Member since 2017 • 2076 Posts

@Nuck81 said:

Trump should thank the media for dropping the story after he killed Epstein

I have a new theory, It was the Buckingham Palace that killed Epstein. One of the prince of the British royals was connected to him. Also, the British royals killed Diane so there is potential there that they can kill someone if there is a threat.

Obviously, nobody would expect them.

Avatar image for Nuck81
Nuck81

7872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 Nuck81
Member since 2005 • 7872 Posts

@watercrack445: There were many powerful people that benefited from his death.

People far more powerful than Trump or the Clinton's.

Avatar image for watercrack445
watercrack445

2076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#15  Edited By watercrack445
Member since 2017 • 2076 Posts

@Nuck81 said:

@watercrack445: There were many powerful people that benefited from his death.

People far more powerful than Trump or the Clinton's.

Yeah, like Bobby Kotick, CEO of Activision, but he's not powerful as Trumps or the Clintons but gamers need to remember him being in cahoots with Epstein.

Avatar image for vl4d_l3nin
vl4d_l3nin

1983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#16 vl4d_l3nin
Member since 2013 • 1983 Posts

Anyone surprised really? Red flags everywhere with the "suicide" with one of the most prolific pedophiles in history, and it's out of the media within a week. Cover-ups are as easy as ABC.

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 judaspete
Member since 2005 • 3270 Posts

This is really messed up. I'm sure it happens all the time too. Hope whoever released this has more that they've hidden away with some kind of fail-safe release.

Also, if James O'Keeffe would release raw footage like this, I would start to take him seriously. Most of his videos feel like they were edited by someone cosplaying Edward Scissorhands.

Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

4139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Sevenizz
Member since 2010 • 4139 Posts

@vl4d_l3nin: ‘ Cover-ups are as easy as ABC.’

So damn clever I wanna scratch myself.

Avatar image for THUMPTABLE
THUMPTABLE

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 THUMPTABLE
Member since 2003 • 2118 Posts

@n64dd said:

Everybody knows abc is owned by the democratic party. We should be impeacing them instead of our hero Trump.

Who is 'our'

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

44852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 44852 Posts

Well if it's true it is certainly quite a story. Wish ABC would come out with the info but a lot of the rich and powerful folks are still rich and powerful.

Sucks that Project Veritas came out with this, a more credible source would be nice. These people literally make stories up and edit together soundbites.

Anyway, that was a nice distraction. But Epstein is dead, and we have a traitorous pussy-grabbing misogynistic man-child with a chronic lying habit that needs impeaching. Focus!!!

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

2666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#21 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 2666 Posts

@mrbojangles25: lol, one terrible leader is more important to take down than a world wide child sex cult run by the most powerful people?

Avatar image for joebones5000
joebones5000

2872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 joebones5000
Member since 2016 • 2872 Posts

So the network couldn't verify this woman's accusations and decided not to run the story. Happens all the time.

Avatar image for jeezers
jeezers

3547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 jeezers
Member since 2007 • 3547 Posts

@joebones5000 said:

So the network couldn't verify this woman's accusations and decided not to run the story. Happens all the time.

didn't stop ABC from going on about kavanaugh or the covington kids.

This anchor claims to have sat down with multiple witnesses and had photo evidence... said the network was worried about loosing the privilege of interviewing will and kate... story got shelved.... and here you are defending this trash.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@jeezers said:
@joebones5000 said:

So the network couldn't verify this woman's accusations and decided not to run the story. Happens all the time.

didn't stop ABC from going on about kavanaugh or the covington kids.

This anchor claims to have sat down with multiple witnesses and had photo evidence... said the network was worried about loosing the privilege of interviewing will and kate... story got shelved.... and here you are defending this trash.

How come no one has leaked it yet then? Could leak some of it through other networks. Enough to get more focus on it, or over a longer period of time if needed.

Avatar image for jeezers
jeezers

3547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By jeezers
Member since 2007 • 3547 Posts

@horgen: i believe since this veritas vid came out, ABC said they were saving the interviews and content for a future doc. Which no one believes, why would you sit on evidence of such a serious crime for over 3 years, as far as im concerned ABC let this go on. They had an oppurtunity to nip it in the bud, also think about what was going on 3 years ago... The 2016 election... I wonder if that had anything to do with it hmmmm. The anchor here specifically mentioned clinton and prince Andrew.

Just sayin..

Avatar image for jeezers
jeezers

3547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By jeezers
Member since 2007 • 3547 Posts

@horgen: the beanie genie is fired up over this, get em tim dog lol

https://youtu.be/9miFMbOhWlI

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

7839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 7839 Posts
@horgen said:
@jeezers said:
@joebones5000 said:

So the network couldn't verify this woman's accusations and decided not to run the story. Happens all the time.

didn't stop ABC from going on about kavanaugh or the covington kids.

This anchor claims to have sat down with multiple witnesses and had photo evidence... said the network was worried about loosing the privilege of interviewing will and kate... story got shelved.... and here you are defending this trash.

How come no one has leaked it yet then? Could leak some of it through other networks. Enough to get more focus on it, or over a longer period of time if needed.

Since CBS just fired a former ABC employee they suspect had access to the footage, I can see how anybody else that may have access to it may be scared to leak it since they don't want to be blacklisted from the entire industry.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@ad1x2: The whole media business is in someone's iron claw that didn't want this released you say?

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

7839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 7839 Posts
@horgen said:

@ad1x2: The whole media business is in someone's iron claw that didn't want this released you say?

After the footage was released, ABC verified it as authentic and Amy Robach released a statement trying to downplay it (probably because she wanted to keep her job). After that, it received almost no coverage outside of right-wing news. Tucker Carlson and Hannity reported on it, but those two are as bad as Alex Jones according to some people in this forum. Then an employee that was working for an entirely different network is fired because she supposedly had access to the footage despite no reports that she was the whistleblower.

Yeah, someone didn't want this to get out. The media spent more time reporting on some teen from Kentucky smirking while wearing a MAGA hat than on a multi-millionaire that may have footage of several powerful men having sex with minors allegedly committing suicide while awaiting trial. The problem is many Liberals will argue it was Trump and/or Barr, many Conservatives will argue it was Hillary and/or some other powerful Democrat(s), and most normal people just want elites that were screwing children to face justice regardless of their political party.

Avatar image for leicam6
LeicaM6

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#30  Edited By LeicaM6
Member since 2019 • 241 Posts

@ad1x2 said:
@horgen said:

@ad1x2: The whole media business is in someone's iron claw that didn't want this released you say?

After the footage was released, ABC verified it as authentic and Amy Robach released a statement trying to downplay it (probably because she wanted to keep her job). After that, it received almost no coverage outside of right-wing news. Tucker Carlson and Hannity reported on it, but those two are as bad as Alex Jones according to some people in this forum. Then an employee that was working for an entirely different network is fired because she supposedly had access to the footage despite no reports that she was the whistleblower.

Yeah, someone didn't want this to get out. The media spent more time reporting on some teen from Kentucky smirking while wearing a MAGA hat than on a multi-millionaire that may have footage of several powerful men having sex with minors allegedly committing suicide while awaiting trial. The problem is many Liberals will argue it was Trump and/or Barr, many Conservatives will argue it was Hillary and/or some other powerful Democrat(s), and most normal people just want elites that were screwing children to face justice regardless of their political party.

It’s not being reported because this came from Project Veritas, a Republican propaganda outlet operated by a lying criminal with 0 credibility. Remember those fake Planned Parenthood vids? Pizzagate? The attempt by them to trick the Washington Post into printing fake allegations of Roy Moore?

I’m sure actual reputable publications are waiting for it to be corroborated before they report on it. And no, Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity are not reputable.

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

7839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 7839 Posts
@leicam6 said:

It’s not being reported because this came from Project Veritas, a Republican propaganda outlet operated by a lying criminal with 0 credibility. Remember those fake Planned Parenthood vids? Pizzagate? The attempt by them to trick the Washington Post into printing fake allegations by Roy Moore?

I’m sure actual reputable publications are waiting for it to be corroborated before they report on it. And no, Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity are not reputable.

Did you miss the part where I said ABC verified the footage as authentic? Or Amy Robach verifying that she said it? If the footage was manipulated she would have probably said so.

If you can't attack the message attack the messenger instead...

Avatar image for leicam6
LeicaM6

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#32 LeicaM6
Member since 2019 • 241 Posts

@ad1x2: It appears you are right about them verifying it, my mistake.

As to why it’s not being reported by reputable sources... who knows? I’m sure the crazies will conjure up a conspiracy very soon. And good job downplaying racism against indigenous Americans in that previous post, really showing how impartial you are.

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 judaspete
Member since 2005 • 3270 Posts

@ad1x2: I couldn't agree more here. This one should not be a left/right issue. Powerful people of different political parties were involved with this guy, and they all need to be investigated here.

I'll even give props to Project Veritas on this one. For once they just released raw footage and let the video speak for itself. They did add in the weird heartbeat because they couldn't help themselves, but that's not really a big deal. The point is, everyone should be able to come together on this one. A lot of powerful heads need to roll. They won't, but they should.

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

7839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 7839 Posts
@leicam6 said:

As to why it’s not being reported by reputable sources... who knows? I’m sure the crazies will conjure up a conspiracy very soon.

If I wanted to be a conspiracy theorist, I would mention the fact that they said the story was killed three years ago and then bring up that three years ago was the 2016 presidential election. For the past three years, we've been talking about election interference in favor of Trump but this potential interference is being swept under the rug.

Yeah, the easier theory to believe is that getting that slam-dunk interview with Kate and Prince William was more important than outing a rich pedophile, but would they have done the same thing if Trump was mentioned by name by the accuser they interviewed?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

167876

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 167876 Posts

Okay. Seems like the British Royals were the problem.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

Okay. Seems like the British Royals were the problem.

Quite ironic, don't you think?

Avatar image for leicam6
LeicaM6

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#37  Edited By LeicaM6
Member since 2019 • 241 Posts

@ad1x2 said:
@leicam6 said:

As to why it’s not being reported by reputable sources... who knows? I’m sure the crazies will conjure up a conspiracy very soon.

If I wanted to be a conspiracy theorist, I would mention the fact that they said the story was killed three years ago and then bring up that three years ago was the 2016 presidential election. For the past three years, we've been talking about election interference in favor of Trump but this potential interference is being swept under the rug.

Yeah, the easier theory to believe is that getting that slam-dunk interview with Kate and Prince William was more important than outing a rich pedophile, but would they have done the same thing if Trump was mentioned by name by the accuser they interviewed?

The Trump angle is one possible thing.

However, maybe the Royals would only agree to an interview if ABC dropped the Epstein story. Because pedophile and Epstein close friend Prince Andrew was involved... The British royals are genuinely some of the most disgusting people on the earth (excluding Megan Markle).

Avatar image for Solaryellow
Solaryellow

5268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Solaryellow
Member since 2013 • 5268 Posts

@jeezers said:
@joebones5000 said:

So the network couldn't verify this woman's accusations and decided not to run the story. Happens all the time.

didn't stop ABC from going on about kavanaugh or the covington kids.

This anchor claims to have sat down with multiple witnesses and had photo evidence... said the network was worried about loosing the privilege of interviewing will and kate... story got shelved.... and here you are defending this trash.

That was more important than running a big time story? An interview with two goof balls playing dress up was more important than a sex ring?

Avatar image for RedEyedMonster8
RedEyedMonster8

1306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By RedEyedMonster8
Member since 2007 • 1306 Posts

I'll never understand why people cite Project Veritas as a source. How many times have they been discredited now?

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

7839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 7839 Posts

They make some pretty good coffee.

Avatar image for joebones5000
joebones5000

2872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 joebones5000
Member since 2016 • 2872 Posts

@RedEyedMonster8: project veritas has been discredited more times than Trump supporters can count.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@joebones5000 said:

@RedEyedMonster8: project veritas has been discredited more times than Trump supporters can count.

I see it is even labeled as a disinformation unit in Wikipedia...

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

2666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#43 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 2666 Posts

@horgen said:
@joebones5000 said:

@RedEyedMonster8: project veritas has been discredited more times than Trump supporters can count.

I see it is even labeled as a disinformation unit in Wikipedia...

It's not labeled by Wiki itself just that "Three Harvard University scholars refer to Project Veritas as a "right-wing disinformation outfit." which comes from a paper "Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics" and it's all about how the right wing use Social media to influence the masses. I don't about you but to me that seems like it's very bias. I can't actually read the thing as it's pay walled though. I honesty don't know what to believe anymore seems like everyone has a too big of a bias when it comes to US politics.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@npiet1 said:
@horgen said:
@joebones5000 said:

@RedEyedMonster8: project veritas has been discredited more times than Trump supporters can count.

I see it is even labeled as a disinformation unit in Wikipedia...

It's not labeled by Wiki itself just that "Three Harvard University scholars refer to Project Veritas as a "right-wing disinformation outfit." which comes from a paper "Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics" and it's all about how the right wing use Social media to influence the masses. I don't about you but to me that seems like it's very bias. I can't actually read the thing as it's pay walled though. I honesty don't know what to believe anymore seems like everyone has a too big of a bias when it comes to US politics.

Oh right, I skimmed through a little fast.

Right bar that comes up when I google it says: Project Veritas is an American right-wing activist group. The group uses "disguises and hidden cameras to uncover supposed liberal bias and corruption." The group is known for producing deceptively edited videos about media organizations and left-leaning groups.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

2666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#45 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 2666 Posts

@horgen: Huh, that's pretty misleading. Wiki is left leaning though.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@npiet1 said:

@horgen: Huh, that's pretty misleading. Wiki is left leaning though.

Wikipedia should by what it seeks to be not be left or right leaning.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

2666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#47 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 2666 Posts

@horgen: oh yeah 100% agree.

Avatar image for horgen
Horgen

121591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 121591 Posts

@npiet1 said:

@horgen: oh yeah 100% agree.

So why the claim about it being left leaning?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

167876

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 167876 Posts

@horgen said:
@npiet1 said:

@horgen: oh yeah 100% agree.

So why the claim about it being left leaning?

Because he doesn't like the facts...…..

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

7839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50  Edited By ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 7839 Posts

For everyone discrediting the story because they don't find Project Veritas credible, what manipulation are you suggesting they did to the footage (besides adding the heartbeat)?

Why hasn't ABC released the real, unedited footage of what Amy Robach said if PV manipulated the footage to make Democrats look bad? Or are you saying Robach is in bed with PV trying to make Democrats look bad despite her official statement responding to the leak?

I'm legitimately curious about everyone's opinion instead of just the vague ad hominem attacks. Do you believe there is a coverup or do you believe it's nothing more sinister than simply trying to secure an interview with Kate and Will?