Mick Mulvaney admits quid pro quo tells press to get over it

Avatar image for deactivated-63d1ad7651984
deactivated-63d1ad7651984

10057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#1 deactivated-63d1ad7651984
Member since 2017 • 10057 Posts

Good luck trying to spin this Trumpist!!

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178837 Posts

And yet trump's base will still deny it...…..impeach and remove.

Avatar image for Jacanuk
Jacanuk

20281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#3 Jacanuk
Member since 2011 • 20281 Posts

And now he took it back. Which makes him an unreliable witness

Also, just a quick note here, do people realise that once/if Trump goes it´s going to be Pence and considering his reputation in Washington

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36039 Posts

You know what's great/terrible about this? Trump has lied so much about everything that there is no way that you can take his word on this sort of thing. Obviously his die hard supporters will believe him, but everyone else understands that you simply cannot take this president at his word and thus they are far more likely to believe anyone else who goes against Trump on just about any topic of discussion.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

@Jacanuk said:

And now he took it back. Which makes him an unreliable witness

Also, just a quick note here, do people realise that once/if Trump goes it´s going to be Pence and considering his reputation in Washington

An unreliable witness? He said what he said thinking he was supporting Trump. All it makes him is incompetent, just like everyone else the buffoon in chief has appointed.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58270 Posts

We keep reaching new levels of "how much more do you need?" in regards to evidence, reasons, and incentives to impeach.

Time to get the ball rolling, Republicans. I know deep down you all don't like him as much as the rest of us.

@Serraph105 said:

You know what's great/terrible about this? Trump has lied so much about everything that there is no way that you can take his word on this sort of thing. Obviously his die hard supporters will believe him, but everyone else understands that you simply cannot take this president at his word and thus they are far more likely to believe anyone else who goes against Trump on just about any topic of discussion.

Hoping this whole thing he built out of lies and deceit and backroom deals comes crashing down sooner than later.

Yeah I might be getting my hopes up, but there's only so much bullshit you can sling before people catch on to your act. I think there is a baseline tolerance, even if someone likes you, and if you go past that people will finally have enough.

All I can hope for at this point is that the diehard Trump supporters are a small enough % of his total support, and the remainder of his base might finally see how incompetent he is, if not criminal and traitorous.

Avatar image for Solaryellow
Solaryellow

7034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Solaryellow
Member since 2013 • 7034 Posts
@Jacanuk said:

And now he took it back. Which makes him an unreliable witness

Also, just a quick note here, do people realise that once/if Trump goes it´s going to be Pence and considering his reputation in Washington

What you mentioned is the funny part. The never ending hatred expressed against Trump has made these people blind to the other hand. If it ever came to fruition, they'd bitch about something else.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15560 Posts

@Jacanuk said:

And now he took it back. Which makes him an unreliable witness

Also, just a quick note here, do people realise that once/if Trump goes it´s going to be Pence and considering his reputation in Washington

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -1984

You don't get to hold a lengthy diatribe, in which the reporters confirmed the answer in multiple questions, tell everyone to "get over it," and then just walk it back willy nilly. I'm about sure you'd set yourself on fire if you thought you'd burn some libs.

As for the topic, we should try not to forget that Mulvaney also accidentally blabbed that the DOJ has a call transcript and probably a tape (around minute 38:30 of c-span's full video): https://www.c-span.org/video/?465446-1/white-house-us-host-7-summit-president-trumps-miami-resort

And let's also, also not forget that this whole conference was to announce the president flat out breaking the emolument clause (again) by hosting the G7 summit of all things at one of his resorts.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts

Mulvaney admission deals blow to White House impeachment defense

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/466389-mulvaney-admission-deals-blow-to-white-house-impeachment-defense

Yeah this is bad. Especially when combined with those 5 incredibly damning sworn testimonies which all corroborate each other, and confirm many portions of the Texts and WB Report (which the ICIG correctly deemed credible twice).

Imagine thinking this didn't happen at this point. How do you even tie your own shoes lmao.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

@zaryia said:

Mulvaney admission deals blow to White House impeachment defense

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/466389-mulvaney-admission-deals-blow-to-white-house-impeachment-defense

Yeah this is bad. Especially when combined with those 5 incredibly damning sworn testimonies which all corroborate each other, and confirm many portions of the Texts and WB Report (which the ICIG correctly deemed credible twice).

Imagine thinking this didn't happen at this point. How do you even tie your own shoes lmao.

That's easy. Trump never said not to tie your shoes.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36039 Posts

@Vaasman said:
@Jacanuk said:

And now he took it back. Which makes him an unreliable witness

Also, just a quick note here, do people realise that once/if Trump goes it´s going to be Pence and considering his reputation in Washington

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -1984

You don't get to hold a lengthy diatribe, in which the reporters confirmed the answer in multiple questions, tell everyone to "get over it," and then just walk it back willy nilly. I'm about sure you'd set yourself on fire if you thought you'd burn some libs.

As for the topic, we should try not to forget that Mulvaney also accidentally blabbed that the DOJ has a call transcript and probably a tape (around minute 38:30 of c-span's full video): https://www.c-span.org/video/?465446-1/white-house-us-host-7-summit-president-trumps-miami-resort

And let's also, also not forget that this whole conference was to announce the president flat out breaking the emolument clause (again) by hosting the G7 summit of all things at one of his resorts.

So, wait, there's a tape of this phone call? I checked and he totally said it.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15560 Posts

@Serraph105 said:
@Vaasman said:

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -1984

You don't get to hold a lengthy diatribe, in which the reporters confirmed the answer in multiple questions, tell everyone to "get over it," and then just walk it back willy nilly. I'm about sure you'd set yourself on fire if you thought you'd burn some libs.

As for the topic, we should try not to forget that Mulvaney also accidentally blabbed that the DOJ has a call transcript and probably a tape (around minute 38:30 of c-span's full video): https://www.c-span.org/video/?465446-1/white-house-us-host-7-summit-president-trumps-miami-resort

And let's also, also not forget that this whole conference was to announce the president flat out breaking the emolument clause (again) by hosting the G7 summit of all things at one of his resorts.

So, wait, there's a tape of this phone call? I checked and he totally said it.

At the very least he has most assuredly opened up Barr and the DOJ to further subpoenas and investigation, though by now, I suspect the tape itself has been set on fire, the harddrive set on fire, the phone set on fire, and their collective fire set on fire.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts

lmao the damage control on this is hilarious,

'It's not an Etch a Sketch': House Republican rejects Mick Mulvaney Ukraine walkback

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/its-not-an-etch-a-sketch-house-republican-rejects-mick-mulvaney-ukraine-walkback