@Serraph105: I'm just ribbing you a bit. It's the type of thing I could see myself doing after a long day at the office.
Boohoo the meanie president wants to appoint a guy I don't want appointed, better do something stupid and largely inconsequential for anyone but me to show how much I disapprove of them, that'll show them who the boss is
I suggest a dictatorship for you since you seem more comfortable in that environment...........remember thinking for one's self is bad,
You've got it backwards, you're the one who would be better suited with a boot up his ass and one on his head, I'm the guy who advocates small government here
Well you're definitely advocating the censorship of opposing ideologies.........
Hahahahaha, I'm sorry, but WHAT? Did you drink inkjet toner before typing that out? I literally just said that this protest is meaningless and inconsequential and those who are doing it are idiots because the way they are protesting they do absolutely nothing except put themselves in trouble with the law. Nothing, absolutely nothing of what they're doing is going to be impactful to anyone except themselves in any meaningful way. How is that advocating censorship of opposing ideologies? Are you stoned?
Leftists have this weird idea that it's enough to "state their disapproval" for things to change for the better. They're literally just being children who cross their arms and pout because mommy and daddy just walked past the toys section of a supermarket without buying them the toy they wanted because their parents know the kid would play with it for an hour and then forget about it. It's a stupid, petty, inconsequential protest and everyone who supports this kind of behavior is an idiot.
Boohoo the meanie president wants to appoint a guy I don't want appointed, better do something stupid and largely inconsequential for anyone but me to show how much I disapprove of them, that'll show them who the boss is
I suggest a dictatorship for you since you seem more comfortable in that environment...........remember thinking for one's self is bad,
You've got it backwards, you're the one who would be better suited with a boot up his ass and one on his head, I'm the guy who advocates small government here
Well you're definitely advocating the censorship of opposing ideologies.........
Hahahahaha, I'm sorry, but WHAT? Did you drink inkjet toner before typing that out? I literally just said that this protest is meaningless and inconsequential and those who are doing it are idiots because the way they are protesting they do absolutely nothing except put themselves in trouble with the law. Nothing, absolutely nothing of what they're doing is going to be impactful to anyone except themselves in any meaningful way. How is that advocating censorship of opposing ideologies? Are you stoned?
Leftists have this weird idea that it's enough to "state their disapproval" for things to change for the better. They're literally just being children who cross their arms and pout because mommy and daddy just walked past the toys section of a supermarket without buying them the toy they wanted because their parents know the kid would play with it for an hour and then forget about it. It's a stupid, petty, inconsequential protest and everyone who supports this kind of behavior is an idiot.
It's your post above. You can pretend all you want........but I left your post in the quote chain. Then again righties aren't dealing in reality anymore so............it's not surprising you don't know what your words are advocating.
I suggest a dictatorship for you since you seem more comfortable in that environment...........remember thinking for one's self is bad,
You've got it backwards, you're the one who would be better suited with a boot up his ass and one on his head, I'm the guy who advocates small government here
Well you're definitely advocating the censorship of opposing ideologies.........
Hahahahaha, I'm sorry, but WHAT? Did you drink inkjet toner before typing that out? I literally just said that this protest is meaningless and inconsequential and those who are doing it are idiots because the way they are protesting they do absolutely nothing except put themselves in trouble with the law. Nothing, absolutely nothing of what they're doing is going to be impactful to anyone except themselves in any meaningful way. How is that advocating censorship of opposing ideologies? Are you stoned?
Leftists have this weird idea that it's enough to "state their disapproval" for things to change for the better. They're literally just being children who cross their arms and pout because mommy and daddy just walked past the toys section of a supermarket without buying them the toy they wanted because their parents know the kid would play with it for an hour and then forget about it. It's a stupid, petty, inconsequential protest and everyone who supports this kind of behavior is an idiot.
It's your post above. You can pretend all you want........but I left your post in the quote chain. Then again righties aren't dealing in reality anymore so............it's not surprising you don't know what your words are advocating.
Sorry, your third grader level reading comprehension doesn't change what I wrote. At no point did I endorse in any way censorship.
you would have more success if you where a bit more honest.
where there protesters there? yes
was the hearings disrupted by democrats? yes
was the hearing disrupted by protesters? yes
did democrats bring in the protesters? no
no need to take truth to the level of a lie just for effect. it wil backfire on you as it always does
Many of the demonstrators were paid. This was all coordinated by the Democratic senators headed by Chuck Schumer.
The lie is you are trying to ignore the truth. Dick Durbin said as much.
Link? You do know many Americans are disgusted with the current situation. Trump has been protested several times. He's at a very low approval rating. He ONLY has his base at this point.
What you have witnessed in the hearings is the new faced to the Democratic party. Trump has a base of approximately 66,000,000 and getting larger. He has done more and offers more for the country than the Democratic party.
you would have more success if you where a bit more honest.
where there protesters there? yes
was the hearings disrupted by democrats? yes
was the hearing disrupted by protesters? yes
did democrats bring in the protesters? no
no need to take truth to the level of a lie just for effect. it wil backfire on you as it always does
Many of the demonstrators were paid. This was all coordinated by the Democratic senators headed by Chuck Schumer.
The lie is you are trying to ignore the truth. Dick Durbin said as much.
Link? You do know many Americans are disgusted with the current situation. Trump has been protested several times. He's at a very low approval rating. He ONLY has his base at this point.
What you have witnessed in the hearings is the new faced to the Democratic party. Trump has a base of approximately 66,000,000 and getting larger. He has done more and offers more for the country than the Democratic party.
Trumps base is not getting larger
and yes...that is the new face of the Democratic party, one that will not accept and go to extreeme measures to protect this country
It's your post above. You can pretend all you want........but I left your post in the quote chain. Then again righties aren't dealing in reality anymore so............it's not surprising you don't know what your words are advocating.
Sorry, your third grader level reading comprehension doesn't change what I wrote. At no point did I endorse in any way censorship.
Shame you don't understand your own posts. Conservative then?
Many of the demonstrators were paid. This was all coordinated by the Democratic senators headed by Chuck Schumer.
The lie is you are trying to ignore the truth. Dick Durbin said as much.
Link? You do know many Americans are disgusted with the current situation. Trump has been protested several times. He's at a very low approval rating. He ONLY has his base at this point.
What you have witnessed in the hearings is the new faced to the Democratic party. Trump has a base of approximately 66,000,000 and getting larger. He has done more and offers more for the country than the Democratic party.
Nothing wrong with voicing your displeasure at those who serve the people. That's what they are elected to do.
And trump's support is actually shrinking.........not growing. But I love that Republicans don't see that and look forward to the lose of power because they can't/won't adjust.
Way to go Cory Booker for not following the rules that republicans threw out years ago! I hope he faces no consequences for this and it serves to piss off republicans.
Can anyone tell us why these were classified? What pertinent information in these emails caused them to be withheld from the hearings?
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
Way to go Cory Booker for not following the rules that republicans threw out years ago! I hope he faces no consequences for this and it serves to piss off republicans.
Can anyone tell us why these were classified? What pertinent information in these emails caused them to be withheld from the hearings?
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
what did he release?
I will look it up and read those emails, thanks for keeping this in everyones preview
Way to go Cory Booker for not following the rules that republicans threw out years ago! I hope he faces no consequences for this and it serves to piss off republicans.
Can anyone tell us why these were classified? What pertinent information in these emails caused them to be withheld from the hearings?
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
what did he release?
I will look it up and read those emails, thanks for keeping this in everyones preview
He "released" some files regarding Kavanoughs supposedly positive stance on racial profiling
Can anyone tell us why these were classified? What pertinent information in these emails caused them to be withheld from the hearings?
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
what did he release?
I will look it up and read those emails, thanks for keeping this in everyones preview
He "released" some files regarding Kavanoughs supposedly positive stance on racial profiling
and that he actually doesnt consider roe vs wade as unchangeable.
interesting how these emails would be considered confidential, is that because of national security?
thanks again for keeping this topic up so more people can look into the contents of those emails.
maybe they are all fake and created by the 'resistance' i mean the 'deep state'. oh that is right you and Trump dont agree on the 'resistance' claim being true or not
Can anyone tell us why these were classified? What pertinent information in these emails caused them to be withheld from the hearings?
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
what did he release?
I will look it up and read those emails, thanks for keeping this in everyones preview
He "released" some files regarding Kavanoughs supposedly positive stance on racial profiling
and that he actually doesnt consider roe vs wade as unchangeable.
interesting how these emails would be considered confidential, is that because of national security?
thanks again for keeping this topic up so more people can look into the contents of those emails.
maybe they are all fake and created by the 'resistance' i mean the 'deep state'. oh that is right you and Trump dont agree on the 'resistance' claim being true or not
Kavanaugh has never said Roe V Wade is not settled law, that email was about legal scholars, not his own personal opinion.
But it´s funny to see the grandstanding from the Democrats, it´s like watching a children's zoo where all the monkeys run it.
As to the confidentiality, well they are not since they have been released for public, but the papers they claim is being withheld, who knows why they are confidential, they claim it´s national security and to protect personal information but I am not on the chairmans staff yet. So who can say?
I sure as amen in a church would not trust a Democrat on the matter, since their only interest is to stall and attempt to delay it until after the mid-terms.
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
what did he release?
I will look it up and read those emails, thanks for keeping this in everyones preview
He "released" some files regarding Kavanoughs supposedly positive stance on racial profiling
and that he actually doesnt consider roe vs wade as unchangeable.
interesting how these emails would be considered confidential, is that because of national security?
thanks again for keeping this topic up so more people can look into the contents of those emails.
maybe they are all fake and created by the 'resistance' i mean the 'deep state'. oh that is right you and Trump dont agree on the 'resistance' claim being true or not
Kavanaugh has never said Roe V Wade is not settled law, that email was about legal scholars, not his own personal opinion.
But it´s funny to see the grandstanding from the Democrats, it´s like watching a children's zoo where all the monkeys run it.
As to the confidentiality, well they are not since they have been released for public, but the papers they claim is being withheld, who knows why they are confidential, they claim it´s national security and to protect personal information but I am not on the chairmans staff yet. So who can say?
I sure as amen in a church would not trust a Democrat on the matter, since their only interest is to stall and attempt to delay it until after the mid-terms.
well thanks for bringing the emails in question to light that now you are suggesting are real and not fake.
that helps the left, thank you
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
what did he release?
I will look it up and read those emails, thanks for keeping this in everyones preview
He "released" some files regarding Kavanoughs supposedly positive stance on racial profiling
and that he actually doesnt consider roe vs wade as unchangeable.
interesting how these emails would be considered confidential, is that because of national security?
thanks again for keeping this topic up so more people can look into the contents of those emails.
maybe they are all fake and created by the 'resistance' i mean the 'deep state'. oh that is right you and Trump dont agree on the 'resistance' claim being true or not
Kavanaugh has never said Roe V Wade is not settled law, that email was about legal scholars, not his own personal opinion.
But it´s funny to see the grandstanding from the Democrats, it´s like watching a children's zoo where all the monkeys run it.
As to the confidentiality, well they are not since they have been released for public, but the papers they claim is being withheld, who knows why they are confidential, they claim it´s national security and to protect personal information but I am not on the chairmans staff yet. So who can say?
I sure as amen in a church would not trust a Democrat on the matter, since their only interest is to stall and attempt to delay it until after the mid-terms.
God it's like you are trying to be as shitty as possible to the people who don't want Kavenaugh confirmed. The problem is you're kicking down.
@Serraph105: I'm probably going to be repeating this sentiment a lot in the future, but you should expect him to kick down. Virtually all political norms have been shattered, and politics in the US has turned into loosely structured warfare. If you expect anyone, nevertheless a proponent of the Trump administration, not to kick whenever they have the chance then you're going to open yourself up to a lot of blows.
@Serraph105: I'm probably going to be repeating this sentiment a lot in the future, but you should expect him to kick down. Virtually all political norms have been shattered, and politics in the US has turned into loosely structured warfare. If you expect anyone, nevertheless a proponent of the Trump administration, not to kick whenever they have the chance then you're going to open yourself up to a lot of blows.
True, just wanted to call it like it is. It's no longer enough to get what you want, you have to insult and stereotype and be racist towards those you beat. Or at least Jac does, and so does our President.
@Serraph105: I'm probably going to be repeating this sentiment a lot in the future, but you should expect him to kick down. Virtually all political norms have been shattered, and politics in the US has turned into loosely structured warfare. If you expect anyone, nevertheless a proponent of the Trump administration, not to kick whenever they have the chance then you're going to open yourself up to a lot of blows.
True, just wanted to call it like it is. It's no longer enough to get what you want, you have to insult and stereotype and be racist towards those you beat. Or at least Jac does, and so does our President.
God it's like you are trying to be as shitty as possible to the people who don't want Kavenaugh confirmed. The problem is you're kicking down.
What on earth are you talking about? I know you are on the left, but come on even you have to be able to see the shit every single democrat keep trying to pull, in their attempt to foil this nomination.
And hopefully you have noticed that not one single person has questioned if Kavanaugh is competent to get the position, they just try to stall it so they can get past the midterms and have a position where they can decide who gets the seat. Not forgetting that if the Democrats really get their will, this seat will remain open until after the 2020 election, meaning they will pretty much make the highest court go into vacation mode.
@Serraph105: I'm probably going to be repeating this sentiment a lot in the future, but you should expect him to kick down. Virtually all political norms have been shattered, and politics in the US has turned into loosely structured warfare. If you expect anyone, nevertheless a proponent of the Trump administration, not to kick whenever they have the chance then you're going to open yourself up to a lot of blows.
True, just wanted to call it like it is. It's no longer enough to get what you want, you have to insult and stereotype and be racist towards those you beat. Or at least Jac does, and so does our President.
Watch any leftist's social media page and tell me how many of them have never written anything against "white people". Or any joke about the president's weird affinity for color orange.
It's funny how that works, the leftwing accuses the rightwing of doing what the leftwing is actually doing.
@Serraph105: I'm probably going to be repeating this sentiment a lot in the future, but you should expect him to kick down. Virtually all political norms have been shattered, and politics in the US has turned into loosely structured warfare. If you expect anyone, nevertheless a proponent of the Trump administration, not to kick whenever they have the chance then you're going to open yourself up to a lot of blows.
True, just wanted to call it like it is. It's no longer enough to get what you want, you have to insult and stereotype and be racist towards those you beat. Or at least Jac does, and so does our President.
God it's like you are trying to be as shitty as possible to the people who don't want Kavenaugh confirmed. The problem is you're kicking down.
What on earth are you talking about? I know you are on the left, but come on even you have to be able to see the shit every single democrat keep trying to pull, in their attempt to foil this nomination.
And hopefully you have noticed that not one single person has questioned if Kavanaugh is competent to get the position, they just try to stall it so they can get past the midterms and have a position where they can decide who gets the seat. Not forgetting that if the Democrats really get their will, this seat will remain open until after the 2020 election, meaning they will pretty much make the highest court go into vacation mode.
Considering with him on the SC the president won't have any checks.......you should be against his appointment as well. Also he polls very low. Isn't the voice of the people important? You whine about trump's election that way. Stop being hypocritical.
Way to go Cory Booker for not following the rules that republicans threw out years ago! I hope he faces no consequences for this and it serves to piss off republicans.
Can anyone tell us why these were classified? What pertinent information in these emails caused them to be withheld from the hearings?
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
Your snide douche statements aside, that's not what I asked. Par the course, Jacanuk style.
Way to go Cory Booker for not following the rules that republicans threw out years ago! I hope he faces no consequences for this and it serves to piss off republicans.
Can anyone tell us why these were classified? What pertinent information in these emails caused them to be withheld from the hearings?
Well, it looks like the booker was just playing up for the camera and the evening before they were released for public, so he was just grandstanding which is no surprised he is elected for New Jersey and it must be hard trying to live up to Jersey Shore.
Your snide douche statements aside, that's not what I asked. Par the course, Jacanuk style.
Well, you are asking a question no one except the people who deemed them to be confidential can answer. As for us, the public all we know is they are considered to be of national security.
Considering with him on the SC the president won't have any checks.......you should be against his appointment as well. Also he polls very low. Isn't the voice of the people important? You whine about trump's election that way. Stop being hypocritical.
Your confidence in our independent legal scholars is amazing.
But set that aside and look at reality, Kavanaugh is not a moron neither is he someone who will disregard the law. So if it comes to someone trying to bypass 45 years of legal precedence because it´s Trump, I am sure the court will go 9-0 for the first and not be a Democrat puppet.
Considering with him on the SC the president won't have any checks.......you should be against his appointment as well. Also he polls very low. Isn't the voice of the people important? You whine about trump's election that way. Stop being hypocritical.
Your confidence in our independent legal scholars is amazing.
But set that aside and look at reality, Kavanaugh is not a moron neither is he someone who will disregard the law. So if it comes to someone trying to bypass 45 years of legal precedence because it´s Trump, I am sure the court will go 9-0 for the first and not be a Democrat puppet.
Most legal scholars I've heard are warning against this appointment for that very reason.
Considering with him on the SC the president won't have any checks.......you should be against his appointment as well. Also he polls very low. Isn't the voice of the people important? You whine about trump's election that way. Stop being hypocritical.
Your confidence in our independent legal scholars is amazing.
But set that aside and look at reality, Kavanaugh is not a moron neither is he someone who will disregard the law. So if it comes to someone trying to bypass 45 years of legal precedence because it´s Trump, I am sure the court will go 9-0 for the first and not be a Democrat puppet.
Most legal scholars I've heard are warning against this appointment for that very reason.
You mean liberal "legal scholors"
That is the biggest problem with the left, they can´t separate themselves from their political views.
Most legal scholars I've heard are warning against this appointment for that very reason.
You mean liberal "legal scholors"
That is the biggest problem with the left, they can´t separate themselves from their political views.
No I mean legal scholars......it may surprise that except for conservatives most people look at things in real time and not with a party filter.
Also use spell check.
No I mean legal scholars......it may surprise that except for conservatives most people look at things in real time and not with a party filter.
Also use spell check.
Funny how your trolling comes out so clearly
People you disagree with "right nutjobs" people you agree with have no bias.
LOL at least you don´t hide the trolling and the spell check, what a lame attack, you can do better right?
No I mean legal scholars......it may surprise that except for conservatives most people look at things in real time and not with a party filter.
Also use spell check.
Funny how your trolling comes out so clearly
People you disagree with "right nutjobs" people you agree with have no bias.
LOL at least you don´t hide the trolling and the spell check, what a lame attack, you can do better right?
That's not what trolling is.......but I get that you cannot counter and throw that word in.
Considering with him on the SC the president won't have any checks.......you should be against his appointment as well. Also he polls very low. Isn't the voice of the people important? You whine about trump's election that way. Stop being hypocritical.
Your confidence in our independent legal scholars is amazing.
But set that aside and look at reality, Kavanaugh is not a moron neither is he someone who will disregard the law. So if it comes to someone trying to bypass 45 years of legal precedence because it´s Trump, I am sure the court will go 9-0 for the first and not be a Democrat puppet.
It's becoming clearer that he perjured himself on at least one occasion, so he is objectively someone who will disregard the law.
Considering with him on the SC the president won't have any checks.......you should be against his appointment as well. Also he polls very low. Isn't the voice of the people important? You whine about trump's election that way. Stop being hypocritical.
Your confidence in our independent legal scholars is amazing.
But set that aside and look at reality, Kavanaugh is not a moron neither is he someone who will disregard the law. So if it comes to someone trying to bypass 45 years of legal precedence because it´s Trump, I am sure the court will go 9-0 for the first and not be a Democrat puppet.
It's becoming clearer that he perjured himself on at least one occasion, so he is objectively someone who will disregard the law.
In what regard?
Links would be good.
Considering with him on the SC the president won't have any checks.......you should be against his appointment as well. Also he polls very low. Isn't the voice of the people important? You whine about trump's election that way. Stop being hypocritical.
Your confidence in our independent legal scholars is amazing.
But set that aside and look at reality, Kavanaugh is not a moron neither is he someone who will disregard the law. So if it comes to someone trying to bypass 45 years of legal precedence because it´s Trump, I am sure the court will go 9-0 for the first and not be a Democrat puppet.
It's becoming clearer that he perjured himself on at least one occasion, so he is objectively someone who will disregard the law.
In what regard?
Links would be good.
It's in my previous post.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment