WARHAWK!! WOW 32 vs 32!!

I cant believe this!! omg 32 vs 32 thats huge, Thank You sony!

Heres the link where i got it from: http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2007/06/18/ps3-fanboy-readers-share-impressions-on-warhawk-beta/

look at the points to read the good news!

It is 16 vs. 16arturo_ko

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]It is 16 vs. 16arturo_ko

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

It could have been a mistake, plus almost everyone who commented questioned it, same with people here

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]It is 16 vs. 16arturo_ko

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

yea hopefully it's true, but sounds like a misunderstanding

lol

whats there to laugh about?

meh i wanna play warhawk! :( dammit why didnt sony include Australian PS3's in the beta?

Some people say Uncharted, others say Lair, then some say Ratchet & Clank but I honestly think Warhawk could be the game to unseat Gears graphically.

The thing looks darn amazing in the most recent videos we have of it and that was BEFORE they upgraded everything (as seen in the most recent screenshots).

What influence for a game to have big numbers of players, the system? or the network?arturo_ko

How can the guy make mistake when he could have saw his mistake when he was writing a paranthesis phrase and then he actually adds 32+32 to make 64. Surely he would have seen his mistake. mikeslemonade

Yea, but he wasnt the one that made the mistake. one of the beta testers said that there are 32v32 matches. i havent seen one since the beta started, but that doesnt mean they are not trying it out. right now on some 16v16 there seems to be some lag, so we will see.

What influence for a game to have big numbers of players, the system? or the network?arturo_ko

the netcode on the servers and higher bandwidth im sure the system is fast enough to handle that many players at once. games not that demanding on hardware.

Amazing news, if Warhawk does allow up to 64 players per game, then thats going to be really insane. Big problem would be lag.bsin94

lag due to ps3 doubt it, lag due to servers maybe if the user is hosting it. if its hosted by people/big companies with fast connections no lag at all. its all about the netcode and how efficiently it uses the bandwidth

^^ its says there that on dedicated servers they allow 32 vs 32 but you gotta get an invite.4dragonscasino

true

no its 16 vs. 16 cause Im doing beta, damn, broke the rules..lennygundam14

For now 16vs16...and we see only few maps...from 35-40 right ?

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]It is 16 vs. 16arturo_ko

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

Are you correcting youself?

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]It is 16 vs. 16Devils_Joker_22

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

Are you correcting youself?

Fake.

Theres no 32 vs 32 in Warhawk. I'm in the beta, and all over the forums there are threads saying "huh? Wheres the 32 vs 32?" Rumor denied. No dev has said anything about a special "invite only server" on forums.

Fake.

Theres no 32 vs 32 in Warhawk. I'm in the beta, and all over the forums there are threads saying "huh? Wheres the 32 vs 32?" Rumor denied. No dev has said anything about a special "invite only server" on forums.

doolies

1.... u cant talk about it here... 2... there is a 32 vs 32 in warhawk

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]It is 16 vs. 16arturo_ko

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

yea hopefully it's true, but sounds like a misunderstanding

:lol:

[QUOTE="doolies"]

Fake.

Theres no 32 vs 32 in Warhawk. I'm in the beta, and all over the forums there are threads saying "huh? Wheres the 32 vs 32?" Rumor denied. No dev has said anything about a special "invite only server" on forums.

Keasy4

1.... u cant talk about it here... 2... there is a 32 vs 32 in warhawk

yea why are beta testers breaking NDA rules!

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"][QUOTE="arturo_ko"]

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]It is 16 vs. 16Shawtymann

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

yea hopefully it's true, but sounds like a misunderstanding

:lol:

[QUOTE="Shawtymann"][QUOTE="arturo_ko"][QUOTE="arturo_ko"]

[QUOTE="arturo_ko"]It is 16 vs. 16rogerjak

Did u even read? it says 32 on 32.

yea hopefully it's true, but sounds like a misunderstanding

:lol:

Thank God. I thought I was going crazy because I was the only one who noticed that.

[

1.... u cant talk about it here... 2... there is a 32 vs 32 in warhawk

Keasy4

Yet you break your own "rule"? Anyway, how do you know theres 32v32?