Sony replaces your broken Fat with a Slim for a fee?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

I read that Sony can replace your Fat PS3 (I think only the ones with BC) for a Slim for $130 or so. Since I've seen lots of post of broken PS3s here, I was wondering if any of you experienced this? Did they replace your Fat PS3 with a Slim? I know if you're out of warranty even if you open it up they can fix your Fat or give you a refurbish for $160+, but I was wondering if you open your out of warranty Fat will they still offer you the Slim trade in?

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
I hope not, the fats are superior.
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

Another question, for those who opened their PS3 to clean the lens, did it voide the warranty stickers or whatever somehow, or you can clean the lens without voiding anything?

Avatar image for evlnoodle
evlnoodle

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 evlnoodle
Member since 2006 • 359 Posts

Another question, for those who opened their PS3 to clean the lens, did it voide the warranty stickers or whatever somehow, or you can clean the lens without voiding anything?

gago-gago
I didn't get this option when my 60gig broke and yes to open the ps3 you have to remove the warrenty sticker
Avatar image for TheEldestGod
TheEldestGod

4142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TheEldestGod
Member since 2010 • 4142 Posts
Wow, that would be such a crappy deal. I hope my backwards compatible 80gb (upgraded to 500gb) lives forever!
Avatar image for Symphonycometh
Symphonycometh

9592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#6 Symphonycometh
Member since 2006 • 9592 Posts
I hope not, the fats are superior.Fightingfan
Exactly. To choose a slim over a fat is to trade off quality for looks. (That or you place more confidence the Slims won't break 3 years from now.)
Avatar image for TheEldestGod
TheEldestGod

4142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TheEldestGod
Member since 2010 • 4142 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I hope not, the fats are superior.Symphonycometh
Exactly. To choose a slim over a fat is to trade off quality for looks. (That or you place more confidence the Slims won't break 3 years from now.)

Or in this case trade off quality and looks for a lack there of.
Avatar image for Symphonycometh
Symphonycometh

9592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#8 Symphonycometh
Member since 2006 • 9592 Posts
[QUOTE="Symphonycometh"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I hope not, the fats are superior.TheEldestGod
Exactly. To choose a slim over a fat is to trade off quality for looks. (That or you place more confidence the Slims won't break 3 years from now.)

Or in this case trade off quality and looks for a lack there of.

lol. I was trying to be "fair" to those slim lovers by saying that at least it has looks. :P
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
I hope not, the fats are superior.Fightingfan
Hardly. They're big and clunky. They don't support bitstreaming over HDMI either. Pretty weak if you ask me. Of course not everyone has a sound system.
Avatar image for deactivated-641bd8d21037b
deactivated-641bd8d21037b

514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-641bd8d21037b
Member since 2009 • 514 Posts
I hope not, the fats are superior.Fightingfan
yeah, mine has wayyyyy more features than a slim
Avatar image for nightshade869
nightshade869

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 nightshade869
Member since 2007 • 3457 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I hope not, the fats are superior.KHAndAnime
Hardly. They're big and clunky. They don't support bitstreaming over HDMI either. Pretty weak if you ask me. Of course not everyone has a sound system.

Wait, what do you mean? You can't do surround sound or something on the slim? What about for blu rays?
Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I hope not, the fats are superior.nightshade869
Hardly. They're big and clunky. They don't support bitstreaming over HDMI either. Pretty weak if you ask me. Of course not everyone has a sound system.

Wait, what do you mean? You can't do surround sound or something on the slim? What about for blu rays?

yeah i didnt understand that either, the fats have everything the slims do. Even if you havea 40gb or 80gb ps3 yours is superior for some reason you can't install linux, windows 95 or window 98 on the slims.
Avatar image for Symphonycometh
Symphonycometh

9592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#13 Symphonycometh
Member since 2006 • 9592 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I hope not, the fats are superior.KHAndAnime
Hardly. They're big and clunky. They don't support bitstreaming over HDMI either. Pretty weak if you ask me. Of course not everyone has a sound system.

True. More people have PS2 games.
Avatar image for JoKeR_421
JoKeR_421

8920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 JoKeR_421
Member since 2006 • 8920 Posts
sony replaces ur fat for a slim 120gb if ur not under warranty for 119 dollars. and if u are under warranty why would u wanna lol they both do the same thing
Avatar image for batman_is_aweso
batman_is_aweso

2762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 batman_is_aweso
Member since 2009 • 2762 Posts

I hope not, the fats are superior.Fightingfan

i am with this post 11292382483274823748923748%

Avatar image for WiiMan21
WiiMan21

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#16 WiiMan21
Member since 2007 • 8191 Posts

I will never get rid of my original classic Ps3 phat.

Avatar image for Denji
Denji

12757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 Denji
Member since 2003 • 12757 Posts

If my 60gig PS3 ever breaks again (hopefully not) I would never request a Slim as a replacement. Even if offered for free. I would ask for my 60gig.

Avatar image for shabab12
shabab12

2613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 shabab12
Member since 2007 • 2613 Posts
I hope not, the fats are superior.Fightingfan
Ive got a fat so i dont get how you can make that statement. YLOD in the Fats is almost as big as RROD just sony has been able to cover it up well.
Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

How exactly are the fat superior to slim? I own one but I thought slim draws less power and therefore less heat generated?

Avatar image for Justincor
Justincor

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 Justincor
Member since 2008 • 151 Posts

I own a Fat and my brother recently got a slim (i am off at college so it is not weird to have 2) and i want one so bad. The fat is so big and heavy it is a pain in the ass to transport, if mine ever breaks i am without a doubt requesting a slim. I also hate the stupid Spiderman writing on the fat, the new logo is way better.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I hope not, the fats are superior.nightshade869
Hardly. They're big and clunky. They don't support bitstreaming over HDMI either. Pretty weak if you ask me. Of course not everyone has a sound system.

Wait, what do you mean? You can't do surround sound or something on the slim? What about for blu rays?

No, it's the Fats that are limited in the surround department. Not all Fats have BC either. Only the older ones do I believe. The ones that will eventually all die by the YLOD,

Avatar image for wulfshelmut
wulfshelmut

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 wulfshelmut
Member since 2009 • 77 Posts

I noticed someone mention cleaning the lense? I guess sonys PS3 is also having DREs. LOL

Its funny they barely fixed it with the ps2 now the ps3 suffers the same thing. It makes me glad I dont own any of these "next gen" systems. They seem to have all the problems of the past at higher costs. No thanks. Money is tight nowadays and I dont have any to blow on cheap junk.

Avatar image for Kurushio
Kurushio

10485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Kurushio
Member since 2004 • 10485 Posts
I wouldnt want to trade my 60 for a slim either. I enjoy having 4 USB ports and a multimedia reader and especially playing PS2 games unless they start rereleasing more greatest hits remastered like for GoW. Metal Gear Solid remastered would be awesome. Especially if they atleast took the graphics from the GC Twin Snakes version.
Avatar image for hodges_3_5
hodges_3_5

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 hodges_3_5
Member since 2008 • 351 Posts

I noticed someone mention cleaning the lense? I guess sonys PS3 is also having DREs. LOL

Its funny they barely fixed it with the ps2 now the ps3 suffers the same thing. It makes me glad I dont own any of these "next gen" systems. They seem to have all the problems of the past at higher costs. No thanks. Money is tight nowadays and I dont have any to blow on cheap junk.

wulfshelmut

why are you on here then?

Avatar image for deactivated-5a22550b94008
deactivated-5a22550b94008

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-5a22550b94008
Member since 2009 • 426 Posts

I like my fat model, but I don't rabidly support it like a self satisfying douche. If you have BC then that's obviously a big reason to keep your fat... if not, there isn't much else. The slim model is actually better for setups with a true sound system.

YLOD in the Fats is almost as big as RROD just sony has been able to cover it up well. shabab12
LMFAO I want whatever you're taking. PS3 isn't even close to 360's over 50% failure rate, even if you're only considering the BC models.

Avatar image for Bunnyslippers
Bunnyslippers

2171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Bunnyslippers
Member since 2003 • 2171 Posts

My 60GB PS3 died the day before my birthday on dec 27 '09. I am still waiting for A PS3. 60GB or the slim version, I am hoping Sony wont send me the slim version. My reasons why the original PS3 is better:
- 4 usb ports

- flash cardrreader for viewing photo's
- bc PS2 games
- looks better with chrome finish and shiny look.

Some photos I took off my now dead PS3.




Avatar image for jjtiebuckle
jjtiebuckle

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#28 jjtiebuckle
Member since 2008 • 1856 Posts
First time I've heard about this.. my bc 80 GB doesn't play PS3 since fw 3.xx. Would I trade it in for a slim that seems more dependable and actually plays games? Yes, yes I would.. if I was under warranty? No, not at all. That's just plain stupid..
Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts
My 60GB PS3 died the day before my birthday on dec 27 '09. I am still waiting for A PS3. 60GB or the slim version, I am hoping Sony wont send me the slim version. My reasons why the original PS3 is better: - 4 usb ports- flash cardrreader for viewing photo's
- bc PS2 games
- looks better with chrome finish and shiny look.Some photos I took off my now dead PS3.Bunnyslippers
I feel your pain. My PS3 broke Christmas Eve :(. On topic: I prefer the fats more and $130 to upgrade to a Slim is way too much.
Avatar image for Roman_Irishman
Roman_Irishman

29493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#30 Roman_Irishman
Member since 2007 • 29493 Posts

OMG that is a TERRIBLE deal!

I would never trade the look, BC or USB ports on mine for a lame slim model, thats just plain stupid!

BTW I dont understand that sound thing at all, I have a 7.1 sound system hooked up with HDMI and all my speakers work just fine playing either games or movies.

Avatar image for 13C
13C

1024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 13C
Member since 2010 • 1024 Posts

How exactly are the fat superior to slim? I own one but I thought slim draws less power and therefore less heat generated?

Gxgear

this.

therefore ps3 slim >160gb ps3 > 80gbps3> 40gb ps3

but the phats with b/C

20/60/80 motorstorm

are better then slim