acutally i do, i would still have buy the game if it had choppy frame rates, but it would be VERY nice if it could just run smoothly (espeicially since PS3 games keep on getting bad reveiws about their choppy frame rates).
60fps does not mean less textures. True that it takes some power for it and it makes it more difficult for textures but really if the dev puts the time into it they can get the same texture quality in 60. It just takes alot of extra work that reasonalby some devs don't think would impact the game in a negative way.
Insomiac thought 30 frames were perfectly enough for its game so it left it at 30. Kojima thins he'll get the best out of 60 for his game.
I wish it ran on 80fps. Now that would be sooo rad.ShawDowFX
I dont think that the human eye would even notice the difference between 60fps and 80 fps, besides we already cant BAIRLY notice the difference between 60fps and 30fps.
Kojima said it'll run at 1080p at 60 fps, 60 fps is a lot smoother then 30 fps coming from a guy who had to lower resolution in cs because of 30 fps.darkmanure
Link? Not that I don't believe you because I really want to.
[QUOTE="ShawDowFX"]I wish it ran on 80fps. Now that would be sooo rad.haseeb_1989
I dont think that the human eye would even notice the difference between 60fps and 80 fps, besides we already cant BAIRLY notice the difference between 60fps and 30fps.
I can notice the difference between 30 and 60. But you're right. More than 60 isn't noticeable to the human eye.
[QUOTE="darkmanure"]Kojima said it'll run at 1080p at 60 fps, 60 fps is a lot smoother then 30 fps coming from a guy who had to lower resolution in cs because of 30 fps.jsnepo
Link? Not that I don't believe you because I really want to.
[QUOTE="ShawDowFX"]I wish it ran on 80fps. Now that would be sooo rad.haseeb_1989
I dont think that the human eye would even notice the difference between 60fps and 80 fps, besides we already cant BAIRLY notice the difference between 60fps and 30fps.
I can notice the difference between 30 and 60. But you're right. More than 60 isn't noticeable to the human eye.
Yah its pretty much a waste of time making a game go more than 60fps.
Judging from all the screens of MGS4 it looks like the game doesn't have really high texture anyway so I can see 1080p at 60fps easy for this game. The textures in MGS4 aren't ver detailed to begin with.
wow. didn't realise rfom was running at 30. seems really smoothtomdevos
30 frames is a good rate. If it's locked, things will be smooth. 60fps will be noticeably better, but not by an incredible margin. Something like Virtua Fighter 5 requires 60fps due to the advanced moves in the game. A shooter like Resistance doesn't require such how should I say "fine tuning"
[QUOTE="tomdevos"]wow. didn't realise rfom was running at 30. seems really smooth_AsasN_
30 frames is a good rate. If it's locked, things will be smooth. 60fps will be noticeably better, but not by an incredible margin. Something like Virtua Fighter 5 requires 60fps due to the advanced moves in the game. A shooter like Resistance doesn't require such how should I say "fine tuning"The truth. I'd rather have better textures on a FPS than 60fps it's wasted.
[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="tomdevos"]wow. didn't realise rfom was running at 30. seems really smoothpimperjones
30 frames is a good rate. If it's locked, things will be smooth. 60fps will be noticeably better, but not by an incredible margin. Something like Virtua Fighter 5 requires 60fps due to the advanced moves in the game. A shooter like Resistance doesn't require such how should I say "fine tuning"The truth. I'd rather have better textures on a FPS than 60fps it's wasted. I think that the power of the PS3 can handle both.
Judging from all the screens of MGS4 it looks like the game doesn't have really high texture anyway so I can see 1080p at 60fps easy for this game. The textures in MGS4 aren't ver detailed to begin with.pimperjones
Agreed. Except the characters, the environment doesnt have much texture so might be good at 60fps, btw SONY is pushing for 1080p since MGS4 is THE game for PS3 owners, but i'd be happy with 720fps b/c I know Kojima will deliever the best everything there is for his last mgs series game. Lets wait n watch.
[QUOTE="pimperjones"]Judging from all the screens of MGS4 it looks like the game doesn't have really high texture anyway so I can see 1080p at 60fps easy for this game. The textures in MGS4 aren't ver detailed to begin with.Coolboy420x
Agreed. Except the characters, the environment doesnt have much texture so might be good at 60fps, btw SONY is pushing for 1080p since MGS4 is THE game for PS3 owners, but i'd be happy with 720fps b/c I know Kojima will deliever the best everything there is for his last mgs series game. Lets wait n watch.
MGS is not about texture it's about Style and it's very hard for any system to push 1080p at 60 with high texture not even the latest PC GPUs can do that.
Judging from all the screens of MGS4 it looks like the game doesn't have really high texture anyway so I can see 1080p at 60fps easy for this game. The textures in MGS4 aren't ver detailed to begin with.pimperjones
Meh it is an old trailer and did you see the remastered trailer with updated effects and textures. It was beautiful.
And snapping necks using the controller sold me a copy of metal gear even if I didn't know the franchise existed :P Awesome.
I found that Portable Ops toned down on the blood and violence cause you couldn't snap necks and there was no blood. Didn't change the fact the game is awesome but I found it interesting. MGS4 looks to have those back in though.
Kojima doesn't care much for HD he likes the gritty look. Not shiny. What he cares for is "sound"
Log in to comment