what variety? The freedom in the stages are nice but I prefer KZ3
The variety that Killzone does not have. Unlike Killzone, Crysis offers multiple ways to approach an objective. In multiplayer, you are given so many ways to kill someone where as in Killzone a kill is just simple and basic.
what variety? The freedom in the stages are nice but I prefer KZ3
The variety that Killzone does not have. Unlike Killzone, Crysis offers multiple ways to approach an objective. In multiplayer, you are given so many ways to kill someone where as in Killzone a kill is just simple and basic.
Nooooooot really. KZ3 has brutal melee, some very cool and unique weapons, stealth segments, some pretty crazy vehicle segments (jetpack, anyone?), and they mix it all up perfectly throughout. I'm not saying that one is better than the other. I can't because I haven't played Crysis 2 yet. I'm just saying that there is way more variety in KZ3 than you are giving it credit for.
[QUOTE="lowkey254"] what variety? The freedom in the stages are nice but I prefer KZ3
MrSelf-Destruct
The variety that Killzone does not have. Unlike Killzone, Crysis offers multiple ways to approach an objective. In multiplayer, you are given so many ways to kill someone where as in Killzone a kill is just simple and basic.
Nooooooot really. KZ3 has brutal melee, some very cool and unique weapons, stealth segments, some pretty crazy vehicle segments (jetpack, anyone?), and they mix it all up perfectly throughout. I'm not saying that one is better than the other. I can't because I haven't played Crysis 2 yet. I'm just saying that there is way more variety in KZ3 than you are giving it credit for.
The variety that Killzone does not have. Unlike Killzone, Crysis offers multiple ways to approach an objective. In multiplayer, you are given so many ways to kill someone where as in Killzone a kill is just simple and basic.
Nooooooot really. KZ3 has brutal melee, some very cool and unique weapons, stealth segments, some pretty crazy vehicle segments (jetpack, anyone?), and they mix it all up perfectly throughout. I'm not saying that one is better than the other. I can't because I haven't played Crysis 2 yet. I'm just saying that there is way more variety in KZ3 than you are giving it credit for.
Just go buy the game so you can see for yourself.
Eh. I played the other two Crysis games. I know how the nano suit works. Its fun and all, but I'm not chomping at the bit to get this game. The fact that the story is dull (again) and they never fixed the terrible AI (according to the reviews, mind you) isn't helping, either.
The variety that Killzone does not have. Unlike Killzone, Crysis offers multiple ways to approach an objective. In multiplayer, you are given so many ways to kill someone where as in Killzone a kill is just simple and basic.
DevilishStyles
Nooooooot really. KZ3 has brutal melee, some very cool and unique weapons, stealth segments, some pretty crazy vehicle segments (jetpack, anyone?), and they mix it all up perfectly throughout. I'm not saying that one is better than the other. I can't because I haven't played Crysis 2 yet. I'm just saying that there is way more variety in KZ3 than you are giving it credit for.
Just go buy the game so you can see for yourself.
I thought you were talking about weapons, not much there so far. I agree with the freedom of the stage though. That's actually what I was looking forward to in kZ3, for some reason I still like KZ3 better. I don't know why...
Killzone 3 by far, alot smarter AI and the weapons just feels alot better. I do like the illussion of freedom in crysis 2, but the poor AI and weak weapons pulls it down(still a good game, but i just had more fun with kz3)
Er.. how in the world can we answer that question mate... that's like asking: "Which taste better to you, apples or oranges?"..
Different people prefer different gameplay, what I enjoy doesn't make it a law for you, or everyone..
I don't want to sound rude.. but that question makes no common sense.. Rent a game, decide for yourself..
Sokol4ever
I enjoy the taste of oranges more, sir. Besides, who ever started that saying doesn't have a clue. You can totally compare apples and oranges (validly, I might add). I mean, they're both fruits, they're round, they're sweet tasting, both can be made into juice, both grow on trees, and both are juicy. See, I made valid comparisons. And what's the point in always comparing things that are extremely similar? Furthermore, this is a place to discuss opinions, mostly. Just because you tell the world that you prefer one over the other, doesn't mean that you are insinuating that it is a law for everyone to follow. So, relax.
Er.. how in the world can we answer that question mate... that's like asking: "Which taste better to you, apples or oranges?"..
Different people prefer different gameplay, what I enjoy doesn't make it a law for you, or everyone..
I don't want to sound rude.. but that question makes no common sense.. Rent a game, decide for yourself..
I enjoy the taste of oranges more, sir. Besides, who ever started that saying doesn't have a clue. You can totally compare apples and oranges (validly, I might add). I mean, they're both fruits, they're round, they're sweet tasting, both can be made into juice, both grow on trees, and both are juicy. See, I made valid comparisons. And what's the point in always comparing things that are extremely similar? Furthermore, this is a place to discuss opinions, mostly. Just because you tell the world that you prefer one over the other, doesn't mean that you are insinuating that it is a law for everyone to follow. So, relax. Haha. Well put.. I've always hated that saying. You can compare ANYTHING!
Log in to comment