Call of Duty: World at War is not COD5!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Rigour_Mortise
Rigour_Mortise

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Rigour_Mortise
Member since 2006 • 873 Posts

Infinity ward took the rights to develop the numbered games in the series. Treyarch get the rubbish spinnoffs.

Does no-one realise this? Is it gonna be another "Vice City = GTA4" cos that did my head right in

Avatar image for Unknown_Hero3
Unknown_Hero3

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Unknown_Hero3
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts
yes we all know this..:?
Avatar image for RyZZ090
RyZZ090

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RyZZ090
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Well yeah its world at war but before the title came out it was cod5 but no matter what its going to suck ww2 SO ORIGINAL!
Avatar image for Rigour_Mortise
Rigour_Mortise

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Rigour_Mortise
Member since 2006 • 873 Posts

yes we all know this..:?Unknown_Hero3

sorry i was just goin back a few threads and I felt a rant coming on about em, people saying "will COD6 be..." when they really mean COD5 (The next IW installment)

Avatar image for Rigour_Mortise
Rigour_Mortise

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Rigour_Mortise
Member since 2006 • 873 Posts

Well yeah its world at war but before the title came out it was cod5 but no matter what its going to suck ww2 SO ORIGINAL!RyZZ090

Treyarch lose at game development, they should stop trying...

Avatar image for lil_bew
lil_bew

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 lil_bew
Member since 2008 • 73 Posts

Infinity ward took the rights to develop the numbered games in the series. Treyarch get the rubbish spinnoffs.

Does no-one realise this? Is it gonna be another "Vice City = GTA4" cos that did my head right in

Rigour_Mortise

thank u

Avatar image for lil_bew
lil_bew

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 lil_bew
Member since 2008 • 73 Posts
bump
Avatar image for Rigour_Mortise
Rigour_Mortise

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Rigour_Mortise
Member since 2006 • 873 Posts

bumplil_bew

cheers

Avatar image for zaid55
zaid55

1132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 zaid55
Member since 2005 • 1132 Posts

[QUOTE="RyZZ090"]Well yeah its world at war but before the title came out it was cod5 but no matter what its going to suck ww2 SO ORIGINAL!Rigour_Mortise

Treyarch lose at game development, they should stop trying...


The new bond game looks promising
Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts
Treyarch did Call of Duty 3, which was a very good game...:|, and this looks promising as well. If you don't like it, don't buy it, while millions others will and enjoy it.
Avatar image for AgentH
AgentH

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 AgentH
Member since 2004 • 4636 Posts

Treyarch did Call of Duty 3, which was a very good game...:|, and this looks promising as well. If you don't like it, don't buy it, while millions others will and enjoy it.dkhw

COD3 was never near to be close to be good man.

Avatar image for realistic44
realistic44

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 realistic44
Member since 2008 • 8458 Posts

Treyarch did Call of Duty 3, which was a very good game...:|, and this looks promising as well. If you don't like it, don't buy it, while millions others will and enjoy it.dkhw

I might get this - co-op seems hella fun, although insha allah hopefully im getting brothers in arms hh once its released so ima have 2 ww2 fps games.

bah well :P

Avatar image for Cegaiga
Cegaiga

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 Cegaiga
Member since 2008 • 30 Posts

I call it COD5 simply because it is a mouthful saying COD World at War.

Avatar image for aznkhaos
aznkhaos

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 aznkhaos
Member since 2005 • 4133 Posts
CoD3 WAS good. I got it for my ps2, instead of ps3. Adn its was really fun
Avatar image for jojothekid
jojothekid

2108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 jojothekid
Member since 2008 • 2108 Posts
i dont get why people say WW2 games suck, or even treyarch, cod2 big red one is my favorite cod. cod3 was alright but seemed rushed. they took their time with this one, and everyone is too blind to see theyve got better features in this than cod4 vehicles dustructible enviroment. you also say ww2 isnt original yes we know who wins but there is so much story too it its the biggest war weve had. dont say cod should be futuristic what makes it different from anything else , its always zombie aliens from the bottom of the earth attack, and kill all humanity except one man kills them all. i think the modern warfare was cool but dont diss the ww2.also if you hadnt heard the multiplayer is being built of the same engine as cod4. so you should get the same experieance.
Avatar image for halfbreed11111
halfbreed11111

578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 halfbreed11111
Member since 2007 • 578 Posts
yep at least i did
Avatar image for USMC_Sn1per
USMC_Sn1per

851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 USMC_Sn1per
Member since 2008 • 851 Posts
cod3 wasnt that bad...cmon it was a launch game on the ps3!