I dunno. I hear people talking about how R2 will be the greatest shooter this gen. Im not dogging on the game, but I just didnt think the first was all that awesome. Granted, I played the demo and about 3 hours of the full game, but I think I got a good feel for what the game was like, and I wasnt too impressed. It seemed like your average run n gun shooter. It seemed waaay to conventional to have all the praise heaped onto it and its sequel. With shooters, if I like them, I really get sucked into them, and Resistance 1 just didnt do it for me. Im not a huge fan of shooters, but I tend to like the shooters that do things differently, like tactical battles (Brothers In Arms), stealthy gameplay (Far Cry), or even superpowers (Bioshock).
I personally think Far Cry 2 will be better. Look at the trailers and see all the awesome things it does. Weapons degrading, an awesome open world setting, the use of fire, the stealth, it all looks so much more compelling to play then R2.
What really sets the Resistance games apart? Did I just miss the boat on Resistance? Is it just not my kind of shooter, because im tired of run n gun linear shooters.
Tell me what you think.
Log in to comment