1080i,1080p.What's the difference?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Dragons-Soul
Dragons-Soul

135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Dragons-Soul
Member since 2006 • 135 Posts

Can anyone answer?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cc4321d1eaf7
deactivated-5cc4321d1eaf7

299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5cc4321d1eaf7
Member since 2005 • 299 Posts
one is of higher quality than the other? ... 1080i is more detailed than p i think ....
Avatar image for mastermu
mastermu

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 mastermu
Member since 2004 • 665 Posts
One is progressive scan and the other is interlaced.  Progressive is better.
Avatar image for MichaelSoft
MichaelSoft

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#4 MichaelSoft
Member since 2006 • 207 Posts
one is of higher quality than the other? ... 1080i is more detailed than p i think .... weiliang_1988
ERK! WRONG! 1080p is the highest
Avatar image for gatsbythepig
gatsbythepig

11989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 gatsbythepig
Member since 2003 • 11989 Posts

Can anyone answer?

Dragons-Soul
1080p is better
Avatar image for KSD22
KSD22

416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 KSD22
Member since 2007 • 416 Posts
One is betta...the otha one isa not as good. Buta I liikaa. Issa niice
Avatar image for clubside
clubside

667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 clubside
Member since 2004 • 667 Posts

Progressive scan is 60 frames a second while Interlaced is 60 fields a second, or 30 frames a second. A full frame is all vertical lines of resolution, in this case 1080 lines. An interlaced field is half that many, 540, filling every other line. The second pass fills the other 540 lines, generating a full frame every 1/30th of a second. On older CRT televisions the first set of lines begins to fade from the phosphor as the second set is drawn resulting in possible flicker. On newer digital sets, which are always progressive, a blending of fields occurs.

Ultimately the easiest way to explain the difference is twice as much information is seen every second with Progressive scan resulting in smoother video.

Since this is the PS3 board there could be a variety of reasons you are asking. On the PS3 you mark all of the resolutions your display supports and the PS3 switches to the appropriate mode. If you have a 720P/1080i display, when you are at the XMB you are looking at 1080i. If you play Resistance the display is adjusted to 720P. If you watch a Blu-ray movie or play a 1080P game you see a 1080i image. For Blu-ray this isn't too much of an issue as most Blu-ray media is 24fps, less than either 30fps Interlaced or 60fps Progressive.

Avatar image for bri360
bri360

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 bri360
Member since 2005 • 2755 Posts

one is of higher quality than the other? ... 1080i is more detailed than p i think .... weiliang_1988

No its not. 1080p is the best one with the highest quality. Basically it goes like this, "p" means that all the 1080 resolution is shown all at once on the screen, while "i" is when only half of it is shown at once and it switches back and forth very fast producing a 1080 looking picture. "P" will always be better than "i" no matter what because the response rate is much higher so the image will move more smoothly. Even 720p is better than 1080i in allot of cases especially in video games because 1080i may produce a little bit more detailed image, but 720p will perform better in most instances.

Avatar image for plg2307
plg2307

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 plg2307
Member since 2005 • 953 Posts

HD size

HD size

HD view distance

HD view distance

Avatar image for KaptainKernal
KaptainKernal

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 KaptainKernal
Member since 2006 • 1787 Posts

1080p > 720p = 1080i > 520p > 480p > 480i > youtube

^ THERE THE COMPLETE GUIDE 

Avatar image for plg2307
plg2307

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 plg2307
Member since 2005 • 953 Posts

1080p > 720p = 1080i > 520p > 480p > 480i > youtube

^ THERE THE COMPLETE GUIDE 

KaptainKernal

Lol I loved the youtube comparison :D

Avatar image for jimmysCY
jimmysCY

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 jimmysCY
Member since 2007 • 234 Posts
the 1080p has 2million pixels while the 1080i has one million.The differnce is very big because the pixels are the quality of the picture
Avatar image for grouser22001
grouser22001

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 grouser22001
Member since 2003 • 151 Posts
let me tell you the truth my friend, i have a kdsr60xbr2 sony tv and it has 480i to 1080p  and i tried blu-ray on 1080i and 1080p at 10 feet away and u can tell no differance. even with the $3200 price tag. and now if if could just get this hdmi reciver to work with dolby truehd i would be in busniess.
Avatar image for alberto2045
alberto2045

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 alberto2045
Member since 2005 • 1591 Posts

HD size

HD size

HD view distance

HD view distance

plg2307

 

 

1440p??? i thought the eye of a human beign arent able to see more then 1080p

Avatar image for plg2307
plg2307

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 plg2307
Member since 2005 • 953 Posts

1440p??? i thought the eye of a human beign arent able to see more then 1080p

alberto2045

For your information:

Roger N. Clark estimates human vision resolution to be equivalent to 576 megapixels (24000 x 24000 pixels) for a 120 degree field of view. Extensive background, assumptions, and calculations are available at http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.htm

Taken for Wikipedia

Avatar image for SonicTheMonkey
SonicTheMonkey

2709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 SonicTheMonkey
Member since 2004 • 2709 Posts
one is of higher quality than the other? ... 1080i is more detailed than p i think .... weiliang_1988
other way around
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="plg2307"]

HD size

HD size

HD view distance

HD view distance

alberto2045

1440p??? i thought the eye of a human beign arent able to see more then 1080p

Myth. So is the idea that 1080p is useless for anything smaller than 50". It's much more complicated than just screen size. A higher resolution only allows you to watch a larger TV from a closer distance without being able to see the pixels. For example, with a 50" 720p TV, you could sit as close as about 10 feet before you start to see the pixel grid. With 1080p at 50", that distance is cut to about 7 feet. And with 1440p, it's cut even further down to about 5 feet. But as you can probably imagine, even at 1080p, sitting that close to that large of a TV would be akin to sitting at the front of a movie theater. IMO, 720p provides the best balance of screen size and viewing distance. If you're watching TV from too close, you start to focus only on parts of the action on-screen instead of the whole scene. Obviously, it's not exactly mathematical; with larger TVs, 1080p becomes more and more necessary, even at distances where that chart would indicate 720p was the ideal.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
the 1080p has 2million pixels while the 1080i has one million.The differnce is very big because the pixels are the quality of the picturejimmysCY
Incorrect. 1080i has exactly the same amount of on-screen detail as 1080p, even on a 1080p-native TV. This is because 1080i signals are automatically DE-INTERLACED into 1080p, but only at 30fps. True 1080p is capable of up to 60fps, but you will ONLY ever find 60fps 1080p content in a rare few video games, at least for the next decade or so. Movies are filmed in 24fps, and TV shows are filmed in 30fps, and the vast majority of 1080p video games are in 30fps. But the amount of picture detail PER FRAME is exactly the same. 1080p is little more than a marketer's bullet point. Don't get me wrong; 1080p has fewer limits, and eventually we'll see content that does exploit 1080p's higher maximum frame rate over 1080i, but that time is far into the future. Expect 1080p to really show its worth when the PS4 comes about, maybe even the PS5.
Avatar image for IQT786
IQT786

2604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 IQT786
Member since 2005 • 2604 Posts
if buying a 1080p screen or 720p etc the most impotant thing is contrast ratio e.g if buying 1080p screen with 500.1 contrast then the 1080p will look like sh*t the higher the contrast the better the picture but i would go for a sumsung 720p or 1080p because they have 10000.1 contrast the highest on lcd i believe 720p is enogh but 1080p is very sharp also if you can wait atleast 4 years there will be 1440p screens with 50000.1 contrast imagine that with built in 7.1 surround ooooooooooooooo
Avatar image for Dragons-Soul
Dragons-Soul

135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Dragons-Soul
Member since 2006 • 135 Posts

Progressive scan is 60 frames a second while Interlaced is 60 fields a second, or 30 frames a second. A full frame is all vertical lines of resolution, in this case 1080 lines. An interlaced field is half that many, 540, filling every other line. The second pass fills the other 540 lines, generating a full frame every 1/30th of a second. On older CRT televisions the first set of lines begins to fade from the phosphor as the second set is drawn resulting in possible flicker. On newer digital sets, which are always progressive, a blending of fields occurs.

Ultimately the easiest way to explain the difference is twice as much information is seen every second with Progressive scan resulting in smoother video.

Since this is the PS3 board there could be a variety of reasons you are asking. On the PS3 you mark all of the resolutions your display supports and the PS3 switches to the appropriate mode. If you have a 720P/1080i display, when you are at the XMB you are looking at 1080i. If you play Resistance the display is adjusted to 720P. If you watch a Blu-ray movie or play a 1080P game you see a 1080i image. For Blu-ray this isn't too much of an issue as most Blu-ray media is 24fps, less than either 30fps Interlaced or 60fps Progressive.

clubside

 

Thanks for the info.The reason i wanted to know is because I just got me a Sony Bravia and it has 1080p stamped on it whereas my friend has 1080i on his Phllips tv.We just wanted to know the difference.I own a ps3 by the way.