This topic is locked from further discussion.
I can agree with AC and BS, but I dunno why you wouldn't want to finish F.E.A.R. It does admittedly have a fairly week final act, but the gunplay is magnificent throughout.fatshodan
Well the graphics looked like half life1 to me so i got pissed and never touched it
Because there isn't a good story to keep you entertained.
To me story is the most important thing in a game, my favorite games have always had an interesting story, most of the times the games I don't finish are the ones that lack in this aspect. I even like bad games if they have a good story.
[QUOTE="fatshodan"]I can agree with AC and BS, but I dunno why you wouldn't want to finish F.E.A.R. It does admittedly have a fairly week final act, but the gunplay is magnificent throughout.sandeep410
Well the graphics looked like half life1 to me so i got pissed and never touched it
Graphics looked like HL1? WTF?
Are you playing at 400x320?
[QUOTE="fatshodan"]I can agree with AC and BS, but I dunno why you wouldn't want to finish F.E.A.R. It does admittedly have a fairly week final act, but the gunplay is magnificent throughout.sandeep410
Well the graphics looked like half life1 to me so i got pissed and never touched it
Excuse me? The graphics may look a bit bland, but much better than Half Life's! It's perfectly playable with its graphics.
Because there isn't a good story to keep you entertained.
To me story is the most important thing in a game, my favorite games have always had an interesting story, most of the times the games I don't finish are the ones that lack in this aspect. I even like bad games if they have a good story.
[QUOTE="sandeep410"][QUOTE="fatshodan"]I can agree with AC and BS, but I dunno why you wouldn't want to finish F.E.A.R. It does admittedly have a fairly week final act, but the gunplay is magnificent throughout.vash47
Well the graphics looked like half life1 to me so i got pissed and never touched it
Graphics looked like HL1? WTF?
Are you playing at 400x320?
Na on 1204x1028
Ya graphics and textures all look similar to healflife1 maybe a little better
Na on 1204x1028
Ya graphics and textures all look similar to healflife1 maybe a little better
sandeep410
the game is better played at 1600x1200 and up (quite a challenge hardware wise while it was just released).
but regradlessly, F.E.A.R should not be considered among "games nowadays."
I did finish both F.E.A.R (+ extraction point) and Bioshock.
[QUOTE="vash47"]Because there isn't a good story to keep you entertained.
To me story is the most important thing in a game, my favorite games have always had an interesting story, most of the times the games I don't finish are the ones that lack in this aspect. I even like bad games if they have a good story.
[QUOTE="sandeep410"][QUOTE="fatshodan"]I can agree with AC and BS, but I dunno why you wouldn't want to finish F.E.A.R. It does admittedly have a fairly week final act, but the gunplay is magnificent throughout.sandeep410
Well the graphics looked like half life1 to me so i got pissed and never touched it
Graphics looked like HL1? WTF?
Are you playing at 400x320?
Na on 1204x1028
Ya graphics and textures all look similar to healflife1 maybe a little better
Half Life:
F.E.A.R:
I do not understand why you are comparing the visual standard of one of the best looking games of 2005 with a game released in 1999 based on a modified engine which was already three years old at Half Life's release. They are not even vaguely comparable. F.E.A.R is visually vastly superior.
Y arent games now a days not worth finishing?sandeep410
It's called A.D.D.
Anyways I had no trouble in finishing all the games you listed several times. The gameplay and stories were enough to keep me entertained for several playthroughs. The only I didn't want to finish playing was Doom3 and Doom3 Resurrection of Evil. Those games were so repetitive and long I had to force myself to finish them.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment