Would an i5 750k quad at 3.4 ghz bottleneck a gtx 690?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for soldine
soldine

1980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 soldine
Member since 2007 • 1980 Posts

I recently upgraded my gpu to a gtx 690, However in certain games I get some suprisingly low fps, in particular playing far cry 3 I can get as low as 30. My specs are below.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11698 Posts
Far Cry 3 is very CPU demanding. Your CPU isn't good enough to max it out.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23832 Posts
At 3.4 ghz you will be fine.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23832 Posts

Far Cry 3 is very CPU demanding. Your CPU isn't good enough to max it out.ShadowDeathX
farcry 3 isnt a good example of a well coded game. Most people are lucky to get 40+ average with good cpu's and a gpu's

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]Far Cry 3 is very CPU demanding. Your CPU isn't good enough to max it out.04dcarraher

farcry 3 isnt a good example of a well coded game. Most people are lucky to get 40+ average with good cpu's and a gpu's

By good you mean, mid-range machines that are 2-3 years old right?
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23832 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]Far Cry 3 is very CPU demanding. Your CPU isn't good enough to max it out.Nibroc420

farcry 3 isnt a good example of a well coded game. Most people are lucky to get 40+ average with good cpu's and a gpu's

By good you mean, mid-range machines that are 2-3 years old right?

With GTX 680, at 1080+ there is not a huge difference between a i7 3770k vs an AMD quad core

index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=153

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Far Cry 3 is very CPU demanding. Your CPU isn't good enough to max it out.ShadowDeathX

Far Cry 3 ran just fine on my 3.7ghz Phenom II X4. It runs a bit more smoothly on my 4.5ghz 3570k, but it was perfectly enjoyable on the old CPU. A 3.4ghz 1st gen i5 quad is just fine.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] farcry 3 isnt a good example of a well coded game. Most people are lucky to get 40+ average with good cpu's and a gpu's

04dcarraher

By good you mean, mid-range machines that are 2-3 years old right?

With GTX 680, at 1080+ there is not a huge difference between a i7 3770k vs an AMD quad core

index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=153

Yet the graph you post gives it ~10fps higher at 1200p? Or are you talking about 2560x1600, where it still beats it?
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23832 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] By good you mean, mid-range machines that are 2-3 years old right?Nibroc420

With GTX 680, at 1080+ there is not a huge difference between a i7 3770k vs an AMD quad core

Yet the graph you post gives it ~10fps higher at 1200p? Or are you talking about 2560x1600, where it still beats it?

10 fps difference proves that the game is poorly coded, with a intel i7 3770 at 4.5 ghz = 1 fps over a stock i7 3770. even then i7 at 4.5 ghz does not even make 60 fps averages. Dont forget the measly Athlon X4 645 at 3.1 ghz is only 12 fps difference with a gtx 680.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

With GTX 680, at 1080+ there is not a huge difference between a i7 3770k vs an AMD quad core

04dcarraher

Yet the graph you post gives it ~10fps higher at 1200p? Or are you talking about 2560x1600, where it still beats it?

10 fps difference proves that the game is poorly coded, with a intel i7 3770 at 4.5 ghz = 1 fps over a stock i7 3770. even then i7 at 4.5 ghz does not even make 60 fps averages. Dont forget the measly Athlon X4 645 at 3.1 ghz is only 12 fps difference with a gtx 680.

First you said you were using 1080p as the comparison, at that it gets more than 10fps. Now you're using the 2560x1600 figures for comparison... All the graph proves is the game is more GPU dependent than CPU dependent.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Or if you are a reasonable person and like to play sp games at 80+ fps oh yeah cpu does matter
Avatar image for way2funny
way2funny

4570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 way2funny
Member since 2003 • 4570 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] farcry 3 isnt a good example of a well coded game. Most people are lucky to get 40+ average with good cpu's and a gpu's

04dcarraher

By good you mean, mid-range machines that are 2-3 years old right?

With GTX 680, at 1080+ there is not a huge difference between a i7 3770k vs an AMD quad core

index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=153

Thats because the CPU is being bottlenecked by the GPU at those high resolutions

Avatar image for darksusperia
darksusperia

6945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 darksusperia
Member since 2004 • 6945 Posts
use the custom sli bit. you shouldbe well above 30 even at minimum fps. my sli 570's would only go as low as ~45fps max settings no aa 1080p dx11.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#14 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]Far Cry 3 is very CPU demanding. Your CPU isn't good enough to max it out.hartsickdiscipl

Far Cry 3 ran just fine on my 3.7ghz Phenom II X4. It runs a bit more smoothly on my 4.5ghz 3570k, but it was perfectly enjoyable on the old CPU. A 3.4ghz 1st gen i5 quad is just fine.

I'd say so also. My son has a Athlon x4 and he can run far cry3 fine, with 30-40fps. He is only gaming @ 1600 x 900 res though.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#15 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts
[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]Far Cry 3 is very CPU demanding. Your CPU isn't good enough to max it out.godzillavskong

Far Cry 3 ran just fine on my 3.7ghz Phenom II X4. It runs a bit more smoothly on my 4.5ghz 3570k, but it was perfectly enjoyable on the old CPU. A 3.4ghz 1st gen i5 quad is just fine.

I'd say so also. My son has a Athlon x4 and he can run far cry3 fine, with 30-40fps. He is only gaming @ 1600 x 900 res though.

Correction: I think it's 1600 x 1200
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#16 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]Or if you are a reasonable person and like to play sp games at 80+ fps oh yeah cpu does matter

?? So if he enjoys gaming @ 30-60fps he's a unreasonable person?
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#17 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25777 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]Or if you are a reasonable person and like to play sp games at 80+ fps oh yeah cpu does mattergodzillavskong
?? So if he enjoys gaming @ 30-60fps he's a unreasonable person?

this is teh jiggly. the msot demanding game he plays is BF3 and piror to that it was tribes

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

Check cpu usage and gpu usage

Avatar image for kungfool69
kungfool69

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 kungfool69
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

i would argue the game is bottlenecking the GPU............

yay console ports.....

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16606 Posts

a 690 is a waste of money, go for a 7970 crossfire or 680 sli, both are faster and cheaper

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#21 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="godzillavskong"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]Or if you are a reasonable person and like to play sp games at 80+ fps oh yeah cpu does matterionusX

?? So if he enjoys gaming @ 30-60fps he's a unreasonable person?

this is teh jiggly. the msot demanding game he plays is BF3 and piror to that it was tribes

Lol! I see.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#22 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

i would argue the game is bottlenecking the GPU............

yay console ports.....

kungfool69

I'm with you there.