Ok, I am currently starving for a brand new OS, and would like to know what benefits Win7 will have over Vista, how much better it's performance might be, and all that.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Ok, I am currently starving for a brand new OS, and would like to know what benefits Win7 will have over Vista, how much better it's performance might be, and all that.
My friend just got the Windows 7 beta, and first of all, it looks better, loads faster, and uses about 35% less RAM than Vista used.Ok, I am currently starving for a brand new OS, and would like to know what benefits Win7 will have over Vista, how much better it's performance might be, and all that.
Hellsing2o2
[QUOTE="Hellsing2o2"]My friend just got the Windows 7 beta, and first of all, it looks better, loads faster, and uses about 35% less RAM than Vista used.Ok, I am currently starving for a brand new OS, and would like to know what benefits Win7 will have over Vista, how much better it's performance might be, and all that.
brandontwb
I'm sold.
My friend just got the Windows 7 beta, and first of all, it looks better, loads faster, and uses about 35% less RAM than Vista used.[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="Hellsing2o2"]
Ok, I am currently starving for a brand new OS, and would like to know what benefits Win7 will have over Vista, how much better it's performance might be, and all that.
Hellsing2o2
I'm sold.
I noticed you have the G man in your display pic. As of now, Windows 7 has compatibility issues with Half-Life 2. You might want to check into that before you buy.[QUOTE="Hellsing2o2"][QUOTE="brandontwb"]My friend just got the Windows 7 beta, and first of all, it looks better, loads faster, and uses about 35% less RAM than Vista used.brandontwb
I'm sold.
I noticed you have the G man in your display pic. As of now, Windows 7 has compatibility issues with Half-Life 2. You might want to check into that before you buy.Is it just HL2? Or all sourse games? Because I only play L4D right now.
Yeah I've been using Windows 7 RC (32-bit) for a while now on my laptop and have had no real problems with it. Comparing it to 64-bit Vista, which I used earlier this year for quite some time) I'd say it's a bit faster and definitely less of a memory hog...plus I like the new layout and such :)
I noticed you have the G man in your display pic. As of now, Windows 7 has compatibility issues with Half-Life 2. You might want to check into that before you buy.[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="Hellsing2o2"]
I'm sold.
Hellsing2o2
Is it just HL2? Or all sourse games? Because I only play L4D right now.
L4D is what my friend played and it ran very well to say the least.Yeah I've been using Windows 7 RC (32-bit) for a while now on my laptop and have had no real problems with it. Comparing it to 64-bit Vista, which I used earlier this year for quite some time) I'd say it's a bit faster and definitely less of a memory hog...plus I like the new layout and such :)
powerwolff
Yeah the layout is what drew me to it :P It would be SUCH a refresh from 7 years of XP lol
I noticed you have the G man in your display pic. As of now, Windows 7 has compatibility issues with Half-Life 2. You might want to check into that before you buy.[QUOTE="brandontwb"][QUOTE="Hellsing2o2"]
I'm sold.
Hellsing2o2
Is it just HL2? Or all sourse games? Because I only play L4D right now.
I can vouch that TF2 works perfectly on Windows 7 RC.I noticed you have the G man in your display pic. As of now, Windows 7 has compatibility issues with Half-Life 2. You might want to check into that before you buy.brandontwb
Um, what issues would those be? Perhaps the trouble that many people have running HL2 in its 64-bit mode, which is just as common on Vista if not moreso? Sure 7 is currently an RC and you shouldn't expect miracles from it, but...
HL2 runs fine on 64-bit Windows 7 (and Vista) if you set it to 32-bit mode, and the game's 64-bit mode can be made to work with some tweaks to config settings. Of course, if you're only using 32-bit Vista or 32-bit 7, then you don't need to do anything special to make HL2 work.
[QUOTE="Hellsing2o2"][QUOTE="brandontwb"]My friend just got the Windows 7 beta, and first of all, it looks better, loads faster, and uses about 35% less RAM than Vista used.brandontwb
I'm sold.
I noticed you have the G man in your display pic. As of now, Windows 7 has compatibility issues with Half-Life 2. You might want to check into that before you buy. really? hl2 runs perfect on my win7 rc1 machine.i sell PCs for a living. Vista's main issue isnt compatibility, its brand perception. hopefully they fix it this time. so far every customers "friend of a friend" hates vista coz it cant run some obscure old program. Yet, everyone who comes in quoting "their IT guy from work", all the feedback for win7 is positive.
Iam in the same industry and i COMPLETELY agree with what you just said.i sell PCs for a living. Vista's main issue isnt compatibility, its brand perception. hopefully they fix it this time. so far every customers "friend of a friend" hates vista coz it cant run some obscure old program. Yet, everyone who comes in quoting "their IT guy from work", all the feedback for win7 is positive.
kungfool69
Vista isn't as bad as most people think, it is pretty good.. but Win7 is better in the sense it uses a bit less system resources so everybody wins, that and 7 works faster with SSD's than other OS's, plus you can get it Retailfor only £50 before the price shoots up to £150
cant go wrong, never ever seen a retail OS go for that price on preorder.
Well the difference memory wise is the way Windows 7 manages it, they've changed it, I read Windows 7 put's things in parallel, whereas Vista kinda stacks processes. The reason why BOTH Windows 7 and Vista use a fair amount of RAM is Superfetch, which adds most used programs and processes into your Ram for faster viewing/access, the other difference is that Windows 7 appears to scale better from low end PC's to High-end PC's, wheres as Vista can struggle on lower end PC's Vista's base Ram is said to be 600mb, and Windows 7 is around 300mb, but having said that Vista on a system with 2gb RAM on 32-bit runs just fine, and on 64-bit 4gb RAM it flies, Windows 7 is just more efficient at it. It is known Windows 7 is based off of Vista code, and its driver set, they've had a public beta and feedback and Listened to us.
In a nutshell Windows 7 is a decent improvement over Windows Vista, including everything people have said before me, and I would recommend to anyone to pre-order it now!!
[QUOTE="Hellsing2o2"][QUOTE="brandontwb"]My friend just got the Windows 7 beta, and first of all, it looks better, loads faster, and uses about 35% less RAM than Vista used.brandontwb
I'm sold.
I noticed you have the G man in your display pic. As of now, Windows 7 has compatibility issues with Half-Life 2. You might want to check into that before you buy. Really now? I've been playing CS:S, L4D and HL2, all of which run perfectly on win7x86Yeah, that's true - I've noticed that Vista reported the cached memory as part of its 'in use.' 7 reports the cached memory as 'Cached,' and differentiates between the 'available' and 'free' memory, and most people don't seem to notice the slight change and just assume that 7 uses a gig less RAM or something.Win7 has the about the same memory footprint as Vista. In fact it's almost the same in every other aspect as well. I can only tell I am in Win 7 and not Vista by looking at the taskbar.
Gog
Win7 has the about the same memory footprint as Vista. In fact it's almost the same in every other aspect as well. I can only tell I am in Win 7 and not Vista by looking at the taskbar.
Yeah, that's true - I've noticed that Vista reported the cached memory as part of its 'in use.' 7 reports the cached memory as 'Cached,' and differentiates between the 'available' and 'free' memory, and most people don't seem to notice the slight change and just assume that 7 uses a gig less RAM or something. People like to see those sorts of things, it tricks 95% of people.I've written things about windows 7 on here before, and i did mention this trick once, erm cant remember when but yes that is true, just go into task manager on vista, and click the resource manager it will reveal the amount vista is using and its not much different to 7, yet 7 does things better as ive stated above.
This trick actually threw me off thinking wtf are we being fooled into thinking windows 7 is different some way when handling memory when it actually isnt? until i read some things like this
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=672
and other sites detailing how its changed the way it manages resources enough to be decently better, while still using superfetch etc..
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment