WC3 or LOTR: BFME2?

Ok... First of all... I like single-player stuff more. I don't really like multiplayer stuff in RTS games. I know WC3 has a great single player campaign thing, but what about Battle for Middle Earth 2? It looks like BFME2 takes more thought and planning and it has large battles.

Secondly, I know WC3 will run on the new computer I want, but I want to know if Battle for Middle Earth 2 to will run well..

○Windows Vista Home
○Intel Pentium 4 3.0Ghz
○1GB RAM
○GeForce 7900

Thats a tough one. Warcraft 3 i still play, both single player and multiplayer (which is still the best RTS online because of World Edit) and battle for middle earth 2 has its bits but its nowhere near as gd in all aspects. Theres so much more depth in warcraft 3 so dont b fooled by the better grafficks of BFME2...its not a particularily good game...and anyone who even mentions the War Of The Ring Mode...needs to be shot to be honest... a very poor attempt at trying to make it work, more like an afterthought.

If your thinking about these two games because u like building towns and collecting resources ect... than there isnt much out there... C+C3 is disspointing and there isnt much else...however if your wanting this because u like controlling armies and lots of death and swords flying everywhere and dont mind loosing the magic then buy Medival Total War 2....its argueably the best stratergy game to come out in a few years.

I play WC3 daily got bored of BFME2 really fast

but both are pretty boring offline anyways dont buy either if you dont plan to play online.  

But wc3 really hurts BFME2 but most people on here werent around when it came out so they prob dont like it as much

i going to play some WC3 now i only play modded maps not regualar anymore lol