Van Buren (Fallout 3) tech demo released!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SuperBeast
SuperBeast

13229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SuperBeast
Member since 2002 • 13229 Posts

http://www.nma-fallout.com/article.php?id=35970

 I'm hesitant to download it, it will be upsetting to know I'll never get to play this game....      *sigh*   RIP Fallout....

Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
Thanks so much for the info.
Avatar image for Harbadakus
Harbadakus

5474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Harbadakus
Member since 2005 • 5474 Posts
I've been downloading it for the past 2 1/2 hours, just 20 minutes to go. I hope it runs. :D
Avatar image for arc_salvo
arc_salvo

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 arc_salvo
Member since 2004 • 557 Posts

I'm gonna download this even though I know I'll probably never get to play it.  I really am mixed about what to think about Bethesda making Fallout 3.  Given the humdrum and superficial storylines and lackluster characters I've seen in their products so far, I really don't know if they really have the talent and potential to capture all the spirit and life that made the Fallout series so fun.

I guess it'll be over month before I'm able to really say for sure, but if it turns out that Bethesda's Fallout 3 is just Oblivion with mutants, and just as superficial, then I'll be quite upset, and you can bet that I won't be buying it.

 I still don't get why they just didn't hand the license over to Obsidian or Troika (back when it still existed) or hell, a special team made out of the veterans of both companies that were the same people that made the first two.  If they really were "big fallout fans" like they said they were, they really ought to have given the development over to the people who made it great so that fans everywhere could rejoice.  Doing it themselves (and possibly messing it up horribly like some kind of fanfiction writer who's making a game instead) was probably one of the worst options they could've considered.

I hope very much that I'm wrong and the Fallout 3 is a good game that's true to the gameplay and the spirit of the previous games, but my gut instinct tells me otherwise.  I still really, -really- hope I'm wrong though.

Avatar image for Alaris83
Alaris83

1620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Alaris83
Member since 2004 • 1620 Posts
It's very cool that this got released.  I don't know of any fanbase that's dedicated enough to get their hands on something like this.  Just goes to show just how strongly the fanbase feels about Fallout, and just how big of a mistake Bethesda is making by producing F3.
Avatar image for inoperativeRS
inoperativeRS

8844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 inoperativeRS
Member since 2004 • 8844 Posts
I love you.
Avatar image for TryDaBeardON
TryDaBeardON

642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#7 TryDaBeardON
Member since 2004 • 642 Posts
Tell me if it's worth the bandwidth.
Avatar image for prowler666
prowler666

860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 prowler666
Member since 2003 • 860 Posts
come on dudes... we've all seen the few screenshots of how Fallout 3 (as Van Buren) was coming up, and you are really saying you wanted to play that s***? don't get me wrong, i was waiting for that game too, but now that Bethesda bought it, i really think it might become something. those old Van Buren pics show nothing more than a little updated (yet outdated) Fallout 2. i ain't gonna try that demo. if i want good ol' fallout, i'll install fallout 2. edit: well damn, i just HAVE TO try that tech demo. i'm a fallout fan afterall :)
Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

19592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 19592 Posts

Holy crapgibbons! :shock:

Downloading now! 

Avatar image for Lilac_Benjie
Lilac_Benjie

12287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Lilac_Benjie
Member since 2006 • 12287 Posts

come on dudes... we've all seen the few screenshots of how Fallout 3 (as Van Buren) was coming up, and you are really saying you wanted to play that s***?prowler666

.... 

don't get me wrong, i was waiting for that game too, but now that Bethesda bought it, i really think it might become something.prowler666

.... 

those old Van Buren pics show nothing more than a little updated (yet outdated) Fallout 2.prowler666

.... 

i'm a fallout fan afterall :)prowler666

I have trouble believing that. 

 

Avatar image for prowler666
prowler666

860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 prowler666
Member since 2003 • 860 Posts

[QUOTE="prowler666"]come on dudes... we've all seen the few screenshots of how Fallout 3 (as Van Buren) was coming up, and you are really saying you wanted to play that s***?Lilac_Benjie

....

don't get me wrong, i was waiting for that game too, but now that Bethesda bought it, i really think it might become something.prowler666

....

those old Van Buren pics show nothing more than a little updated (yet outdated) Fallout 2.prowler666

....

i'm a fallout fan afterall :)prowler666

I have trouble believing that.

 

you don't think it's time to move on in Fallout series? you wan't it to be stuck right where it's been 10 years? why don't you just play Fallout 1 & 2 then?

Avatar image for Lilac_Benjie
Lilac_Benjie

12287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Lilac_Benjie
Member since 2006 • 12287 Posts

you don't think it's time to move on in Fallout series? you wan't it to be stuck right where it's been 10 years? prowler666

What makes a game great? Is it the graphical engine? I worry that Bethesda will remove the tactical combat and roleplay-centric gameplay in favour of commercialism, don't you?

Fallout is nigh dead.

why don't you just play Fallout 1 & 2 then?prowler666

I have done, several times. I want a new story with improved graphics, but I don't want the gameplay to change. 

Avatar image for prowler666
prowler666

860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 prowler666
Member since 2003 • 860 Posts
[QUOTE="prowler666"]

you don't think it's time to move on in Fallout series? you wan't it to be stuck right where it's been 10 years? Lilac_Benjie

What makes a game great? Is it the graphical engine? I worry that Bethesda will remove the tactical combat and roleplay-centric gameplay in favour of commercialism, don't you?

Fallout is nigh dead.

why don't you just play Fallout 1 & 2 then?prowler666

I have done, several times. I want a new story with improved graphics, but I don't want the gameplay to change.

no it's not the graphical engine that makes a great game, but after 10 years i would be expecting a little more than what i've seen in Van Buren.

i also want to keep the good old gameplay elements (meaning all that RPG stuff) in fallout 3, but as far as i can see it, it's very much possible to have them even in first person point of view. i'm ready to give up the turn based combats, wich i know many fallout fans disagree with.

commercialism, yes, but it's Bethesda afterall. i'm pretty confident with them, as i've been with all their previous games.

Avatar image for Mauddib1537
Mauddib1537

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 Mauddib1537
Member since 2004 • 44 Posts
Well we've all been waiting on this for awhile now, so lets give it a chance.  I think oblivion was decent, but I wish the original creators were working on this.  I havn't seen to many community's for fallout or even talk about it in the past number of months so this is intresting.  Thanks guys
Avatar image for master_blue
master_blue

1791

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#15 master_blue
Member since 2003 • 1791 Posts

If fallout 3 is in no way similar to the previous fallout games, then its hardly a continuation of the series, if it doesnt have:

SPECIAL

Turn based combat or at least the option to have combat in this way (FO3 was originally going to have this as an option kinda like Arcanum could switch between the two)

Isometric viewpoint

Dialog with multiple branches linked to your characters abilities

More than one way to solve a quest

Choice and Consequence (eg fallout 2 modoc)

Then it'll hardly be a fallout game, better perhaps for Bethesda to come up with its own PA setting

I fear Fallout 3 by bethesda will be first person, have real time combat only and ....level scaling.

Looking aswell at the new site the concept art looks good, its a wasteland but the music was horrible , it would have been good in a fantasy themed RPG like oblivion, baldurs gate or icewind dale but Fallout had much darker sad music to fit the atmosphere of the game, the music by Mark Morgan was brilliant in this respect.

http://www.falloutvault.com/index.php?title=Fallout_1_soundtrack

 

for anyone interested.

 

Avatar image for prowler666
prowler666

860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 prowler666
Member since 2003 • 860 Posts

well it's obvious, that every fallout fan wanting isometric view and turn based combat, are gonna be disappointed (or i mean already are disappointed) by bethesda.

i'm staying open minded about this thing, and hoping the best and fearing the worst at the sametime.

Avatar image for TryDaBeardON
TryDaBeardON

642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#17 TryDaBeardON
Member since 2004 • 642 Posts

well it's obvious, that every fallout fan wanting isometric view and turn based combat, are gonna be disappointed (or i mean already are disappointed) by bethesda.

i'm staying open minded about this thing, and hoping the best and fearing the worst at the sametime.

prowler666

Yeah, same here, although I'm not really "fearing the worst." Bethesda is a solid developer. I think F3 will turn out just fine. Maybe not Black Isle fine, but it could be worse. Just think, Microsoft could have bought the license for Lionhead or something. Brrrr.

Avatar image for SuperBeast
SuperBeast

13229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 SuperBeast
Member since 2002 • 13229 Posts

well it's obvious, that every fallout fan wanting isometric view and turn based combat, are gonna be disappointed (or i mean already are disappointed) by bethesda.

i'm staying open minded about this thing, and hoping the best and fearing the worst at the sametime.

prowler666

 The problem is, the target audience for Fallout 3 isn't going to be the die-hard Fallout fans.    Bethesda is going to make it geared towards the mainstream public so they can sell 10X more copies compared to what the sales would be for a *true* Fallout 3.   Bethesda is in the business of making money these days, so long as they make a game that is going to appeal to everybody they're going to consider their game a success.   Of course if we to buy some iguana-on-a-stick we're going to have to pay $5 extra in a DLC they offer later on.   :roll: 

Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#19 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts

If fallout 3 is in no way similar to the previous fallout games, then its hardly a continuation of the series, if it doesnt have:

SPECIAL

Turn based combat or at least the option to have combat in this way (FO3 was originally going to have this as an option kinda like Arcanum could switch between the two)

Isometric viewpoint

Dialog with multiple branches linked to your characters abilities

More than one way to solve a quest

Choice and Consequence (eg fallout 2 modoc)

Then it'll hardly be a fallout game, better perhaps for Bethesda to come up with its own PA setting

master_blue

I agree, it will be 1st person with real-time combat most likely. But I don't think they'll use scaling in fallout. Considering their resources and the fact that the engine is ready, I would imagine they would take time to add real fallout type dialogue, choises and consequences. It's not the same fallout without the tb combat but it could still be a good rpg experience in its own right. I'm feeling optimistic, but if they Oblivionaze it I will never buy any of their games again...

Oh, and thanks to OP for the link, I'm in the queue now and despite the warnings I can't wait to check it out. :D 

Avatar image for Orlandun
Orlandun

684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Orlandun
Member since 2006 • 684 Posts
I hear to many people complaining about a loss of turn based combat (although at this point we dont know but assuming tis first person...yeeeeah) I was never able to put to much time into fallout 2 (although im trying to get it borrowed from a friend so i can finally run through it) However I used to play fallout tactics A LOT. Honestly If they made the game play for like tactics I would be in heaven. I still play that game today with my buddies online It was a blast. However this may just be me seeing as i almost never hear anyone even mutter mention of the game.
Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#22 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts
I hear to many people complaining about a loss of turn based combat (although at this point we dont know but assuming tis first person...yeeeeah) I was never able to put to much time into fallout 2 (although im trying to get it borrowed from a friend so i can finally run through it) However I used to play fallout tactics A LOT. Honestly If they made the game play for like tactics I would be in heaven. I still play that game today with my buddies online It was a blast. However this may just be me seeing as i almost never hear anyone even mutter mention of the game.Orlandun
Well I liked it, but it just wasn't really a RPG but a tactical combat game, reminded me of JA2. I wouldn't mind that combat system either.
Avatar image for onemic
onemic

5616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 onemic
Member since 2003 • 5616 Posts

I'm gonna download this even though I know I'll probably never get to play it. I really am mixed about what to think about Bethesda making Fallout 3. Given the humdrum and superficial storylines and lackluster characters I've seen in their products so far, I really don't know if they really have the talent and potential to capture all the spirit and life that made the Fallout series so fun.

I guess it'll be over month before I'm able to really say for sure, but if it turns out that Bethesda's Fallout 3 is just Oblivion with mutants, and just as superficial, then I'll be quite upset, and you can bet that I won't be buying it.

I still don't get why they just didn't hand the license over to Obsidian or Troika (back when it still existed) or hell, a special team made out of the veterans of both companies that were the same people that made the first two. If they really were "big fallout fans" like they said they were, they really ought to have given the development over to the people who made it great so that fans everywhere could rejoice. Doing it themselves (and possibly messing it up horribly like some kind of fanfiction writer who's making a game instead) was probably one of the worst options they could've considered.

I hope very much that I'm wrong and the Fallout 3 is a good game that's true to the gameplay and the spirit of the previous games, but my gut instinct tells me otherwise. I still really, -really- hope I'm wrong though.

arc_salvo

 

Ya, obsidian, troika, or bioware should have been one of the companies to pick this game license up as they have either

 

A. Worked on the original fallout or fallout 2(Troika and Obsidian)

 

B. Had a great relationship with the original black isle studios (Bioware) 

Avatar image for onemic
onemic

5616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 onemic
Member since 2003 • 5616 Posts
[QUOTE="Lilac_Benjie"][QUOTE="prowler666"]

you don't think it's time to move on in Fallout series? you wan't it to be stuck right where it's been 10 years? prowler666

What makes a game great? Is it the graphical engine? I worry that Bethesda will remove the tactical combat and roleplay-centric gameplay in favour of commercialism, don't you?

Fallout is nigh dead.

why don't you just play Fallout 1 & 2 then?prowler666

I have done, several times. I want a new story with improved graphics, but I don't want the gameplay to change.

no it's not the graphical engine that makes a great game, but after 10 years i would be expecting a little more than what i've seen in Van Buren.

i also want to keep the good old gameplay elements (meaning all that RPG stuff) in fallout 3, but as far as i can see it, it's very much possible to have them even in first person point of view. i'm ready to give up the turn based combats, wich i know many fallout fans disagree with.

commercialism, yes, but it's Bethesda afterall. i'm pretty confident with them, as i've been with all their previous games.

 

I don't know how you can dare to call yourself a fallout fan and at the same time say it could be good as a FPS. I guess if there ever was a baldur's gate III or planescape torment 2 we should make those an FPS as well.  

Avatar image for Dracunos
Dracunos

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Dracunos
Member since 2004 • 1154 Posts
I HATE businesses that have the terribly disgusting goal of making money.. I can't stand that
Avatar image for EndersAres
EndersAres

5711

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 EndersAres
Member since 2005 • 5711 Posts
Hmm. Downloaded from gamespot. :cry: Don't know if I should play it or not.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e334bcd68610
deactivated-5e334bcd68610

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-5e334bcd68610
Member since 2004 • 96 Posts

Apparently, Massive Black is the company responsible for Fallout's 3 concept art.  From what I've seen from them, they're pretty competent in their doings and are great for post-apocalyptic stuff. The co-founder, Jason Manley previously worked on Black Isle.

 

They have their own forum, which is conceptart.org, where I happen to have my modest sketchbook (not 56k safe) in the middle of so many talented people:

 http://www.conceptart.org/forums/showthread.php?t=83236 

Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#28 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts
Damn, the download was painfully slow and then my computer decided to crash when it was 98% done. :evil: I guess I won't be playing it tonight.
Avatar image for lokstah
lokstah

1213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 lokstah
Member since 2005 • 1213 Posts

I fear Fallout 3 by bethesda will be first person, have real time combat only and ....level scaling.master_blue

I assume you're joking, but only half joking... I mean, really. Bethesda is a big studio, but some of you guys make it sound like the Elder Scrolls games are all they produce. Actually, some of you guys make it sound like Oblivion is the only game they produce.

I don't think it makes much sense to anticipate or fear Fallout3 looking or playing like an Oblivion knockoff.

Avatar image for zbiggie
zbiggie

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 zbiggie
Member since 2004 • 363 Posts

[QUOTE="master_blue"] I fear Fallout 3 by bethesda will be first person, have real time combat only and ....level scaling.lokstah

I assume you're joking, but only half joking... I mean, really. Bethesda is a big studio, but some of you guys make it sound like the Elder Scrolls games are all they produce. Actually, some of you guys make it sound like Oblivion is the only game they produce.

I don't think it makes much sense to anticipate or fear Fallout3 looking or playing like an Oblivion knockoff.

 

i agree they do make good games, im just hoping its not a oblivion in the fallout world. I guess we will see in June when they release the preview.  

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
Nice, I am going to try it out.
Avatar image for yogibeerpro
yogibeerpro

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 yogibeerpro
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
Demo is not created by betsheda and as far as i know it's not the way game will look like so it's just to show what has been done as a "van burren" project. For me fallout3 could have graphics from fallout tactics, i mean it doesn't need so many changes. in game like that i don't need 3d graphics so much. The story is most important thing, but of course they're not going to do it this way because of money.. For me the best way would be fight system from FT - that you can choose between real time and turns.Anyway the most important thing in fallout is story, freedom in things that you are doing and humor:) i hope that betsheda won't forget about any of those things. And i'm quite sure that they are smart enough to not make it in first person actually there was a fallout  MOD for morrowind  and it wasn't good at all:)