Tom Clancy's EndWar PC System Requirements.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JayVGR
#1 Posted by JayVGR (25 posts) -
Minimum System Requirements
OS: Windows XP/Vista
Processor: Intel Core 2 DUO E4300 @ 1.8 GHz/AMD Equivalent
Memory: 1 GB
Hard Drive:
Video Memory: 256 MB (nVidia GeForce 7600GS/ATI Radeon X1600XT)
Sound Card: DirectX Compatible
DirectX: 9.0c
Keyboard & Mouse
DVD Rom Drive
Avatar image for DGFreak
#2 Posted by DGFreak (2234 posts) -
Thanks?
Avatar image for JayVGR
#3 Posted by JayVGR (25 posts) -
np dude :D
Avatar image for OoSuperMarioO
#4 Posted by OoSuperMarioO (6539 posts) -
Get Ubisoft on the phone, another bad port is on its way..
Avatar image for JayVGR
#5 Posted by JayVGR (25 posts) -
Get Ubisoft on the phone, another bad port is on its way..OoSuperMarioO
yeah, those system requirements are rather ridiculous lol
Avatar image for lucky326
#6 Posted by lucky326 (3799 posts) -
2nd game I've seen now with a dual core requirement this month, I didn't expect it too happen this quickly.
Avatar image for Captain__Tripps
#7 Posted by Captain__Tripps (4522 posts) -
2nd game I've seen now with a dual core requirement this month, I didn't expect it too happen this quickly.lucky326
A sub 2ghz dual core is not exactly a high req. It'll probably still work with a 3ghz+ P4...
Avatar image for RK-Mara
#8 Posted by RK-Mara (11488 posts) -
I can't see how those are too high. But who needs EndWar when we have World in Conflict?
Avatar image for JayVGR
#9 Posted by JayVGR (25 posts) -
[QUOTE="RK-Mara"]I can't see how those are too high. But who needs EndWar when we have World in Conflict?

I have seen that many gamers would be a game just because it has Tom Clancy's name on it...its what I call the "Rainbow Six" effect. btw, World in Conflict is AWESOME!
Avatar image for lucky326
#10 Posted by lucky326 (3799 posts) -
[QUOTE="RK-Mara"]I can't see how those are too high. But who needs EndWar when we have World in Conflict?

Aye, then again Ubisoft now own Massive. I have worries as to what that will entail.
Avatar image for Enosh88
#11 Posted by Enosh88 (1728 posts) -

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]Get Ubisoft on the phone, another bad port is on its way..JayVGR
yeah, those system requirements are rather ridiculous lol

why? O.o

Avatar image for DGFreak
#12 Posted by DGFreak (2234 posts) -

[QUOTE="JayVGR"][QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]Get Ubisoft on the phone, another bad port is on its way..Enosh88

yeah, those system requirements are rather ridiculous lol

why? O.o

That's the point I was making with my original post. Those are extremely meager requirements, especially the video card.
Avatar image for blackdreamhunk
#13 Posted by blackdreamhunk (3880 posts) -
after the garbage ubisoft game dev for this game made over pircay, tell me why I should buy this game. This game was made with pc hate in mind!
Avatar image for Anthony9000
#14 Posted by Anthony9000 (2173 posts) -
[QUOTE="RK-Mara"]I can't see how those are too high. But who needs EndWar when we have World in Conflict?

100% agreed
Avatar image for biggest_loser
#15 Posted by biggest_loser (24266 posts) -
I won't be getting this. I enjoy my "mouse support" too much.
Avatar image for johnny27
#16 Posted by johnny27 (4400 posts) -
oh well i exceed all the requirments except proccessor(5600+ 2.8ghz) by a large margin so i should run this game fine as for wheather or not i buy it? not likely unless its get outstanding reviews(which again is also not likely) and with games like DOW2,starcraft2,COH tales of valor and many more great rts coming out this year i will proably forget all about it.
Avatar image for Lgy
#17 Posted by Lgy (848 posts) -
Hard Drive: ?????????
Avatar image for thusaha
#18 Posted by thusaha (14495 posts) -
Well, I already lost my interest in it.
Avatar image for sakuragi007
#19 Posted by sakuragi007 (156 posts) -
IF those are the minimum requirements you will probably need an icore to run it at a decent framerate. Frankly pc gamers should just give up on this 360 port, mediocre games with absolutely zero support from the devs and ridiculous system requirements. If anybody played the 360 demo everyone should see how this game doesn't need a dual core to run properly, the thing is that the xbox have 3 core so they prob just made a dirty port with no optimization in mind.
Avatar image for carfreak06
#20 Posted by carfreak06 (25 posts) -
Wow... those are some extrememly low requirments. I hate it when they take a console game and detune it so they can sell it to a bigger pc audience. Bring on some high requirments.