R9 290x BF4 120hz.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
#1 Edited by deactivated-58e448fd89d82 (4494 posts) -

Avatar image for PredatorRules
#2 Posted by PredatorRules (11911 posts) -

Imagine R9 OC...

Avatar image for PredatorRules
#3 Posted by PredatorRules (11911 posts) -

*290 OC

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
#5 Posted by JigglyWiggly_ (24599 posts) -

that's pretty bad performance

lots of frame rate dropping

should be 144+ at all times

Avatar image for kraken2109
#6 Edited by kraken2109 (13271 posts) -

Dat off-screen recording

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
#7 Edited by JigglyWiggly_ (24599 posts) -

@kraken2109 said:

Dat off-screen recording

He would need a capture card on another computer otherwise though.

Avatar image for kraken2109
#8 Posted by kraken2109 (13271 posts) -

@JigglyWiggly_: Why?

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
#10 Posted by JigglyWiggly_ (24599 posts) -

@kraken2109 said:

@JigglyWiggly_: Why?

Because he's showing his framerate. Top right of the screen, a screen recorder would hurt those fps.

Avatar image for trastamad03
#11 Edited by trastamad03 (4859 posts) -

Is that the fan of the GPU? I knew it was noisy, but THAT noisy...

Avatar image for _SKatEDiRt_
#12 Edited by _SKatEDiRt_ (3117 posts) -

Welp looks like im waiting a few years for a DECENT gpu upgrade.

Avatar image for lostrib
#13 Edited by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@trastamad03 said:

Is that the fan of the GPU? I knew it was noisy, but THAT noisy...

sounds like it

Avatar image for bigfootpart2
#14 Edited by bigfootpart2 (281 posts) -

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

that's pretty bad performance

lots of frame rate dropping

should be 144+ at all times

I know right. 100+ FPS on ultra in one of the most intensive games out today? Such horrible performance. He should throw that card in the trash immediately.

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
#15 Posted by MlauTheDaft (5189 posts) -

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

@kraken2109 said:

@JigglyWiggly_: Why?

Because he's showing his framerate. Top right of the screen, a screen recorder would hurt those fps.

MSI afterburner has little to no impact.

Avatar image for kitty
#16 Edited by kitty (115325 posts) -

@MlauTheDaft said:

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

@kraken2109 said:

@JigglyWiggly_: Why?

Because he's showing his framerate. Top right of the screen, a screen recorder would hurt those fps.

MSI afterburner has little to no impact.

Be warned Jiggly likes really high fps :P

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
#17 Edited by MlauTheDaft (5189 posts) -

Fair enough..

I might've just given noobie advice to a connoisseur then :(

That being said, Afterburner really does'nt have much of an impact (as long as your framerate is constantly above your record setting, that seems to bork my videos).

Avatar image for godonholiday
#18 Edited by godonholiday (379 posts) -

@trastamad03 said:

Is that the fan of the GPU? I knew it was noisy, but THAT noisy...

Nope it seems to be his H100i maxed out.

I have a gtx590.. thinking about this or the 290. Not 100% what the x gets you?

Either way i'll wait till next year and the 3rd party coolers

EDIT - Actually.. it probably is the card: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpD_r53qxJc

still waiting for the 3rd party coolers

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
#19 Posted by JigglyWiggly_ (24599 posts) -

@bigfootpart2 said:

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

that's pretty bad performance

lots of frame rate dropping

should be 144+ at all times

I know right. 100+ FPS on ultra in one of the most intensive games out today? Such horrible performance. He should throw that card in the trash immediately.

ya def

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
#20 Posted by JigglyWiggly_ (24599 posts) -

@MlauTheDaft said:

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

@kraken2109 said:

@JigglyWiggly_: Why?

Because he's showing his framerate. Top right of the screen, a screen recorder would hurt those fps.

MSI afterburner has little to no impact.

it does hurt fps quite a bit and would destroy the point of the video

the only recorder that i've used that barely hurts fps is shadowplay

obs w/ quicksync, msi afterburner, dxtory all hurt performance significantly more.

Avatar image for lostrib
#21 Edited by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

@MlauTheDaft said:

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

@kraken2109 said:

@JigglyWiggly_: Why?

Because he's showing his framerate. Top right of the screen, a screen recorder would hurt those fps.

MSI afterburner has little to no impact.

it does hurt fps quite a bit and would destroy the point of the video

the only recorder that i've used that barely hurts fps is shadowplay

obs w/ quicksync, msi afterburner, dxtory all hurt performance significantly more.

Also, i don't think MSI afterburner would work because BF4 is 64bit

Avatar image for conorhat
#22 Posted by ConorHat (141 posts) -

Wow you really have to start the game through a web page? That's .... different.

Avatar image for lostrib
#23 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@conorhat said:

Wow you really have to start the game through a web page? That's .... different.

that's how it was in BF3. It's called battlelog, people made quite a big deal about it

Avatar image for clyde46
#24 Edited by clyde46 (49048 posts) -

God dam thats loud!

Avatar image for Elann2008
#25 Posted by Elann2008 (33028 posts) -

Yes high framerate is important and it's great.. but the dips. The dips kill it. But you can thank the video drivers for that. Perhaps, when they improve the drivers.. it will be smoother one day.

Avatar image for tabris91
#26 Posted by Tabris91 (7779 posts) -

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

it does hurt fps quite a bit and would destroy the point of the video

the only recorder that i've used that barely hurts fps is shadowplay

obs w/ quicksync, msi afterburner, dxtory all hurt performance significantly more.

Ya shadowplay is pretty good, I noticed a less than 10fps drop on BF4 when using it.