Lifetime of Role Playing Promised !

Anyone else wanna sink massive hours into this, even if they've done so before?

and the complete anthology is missing Battlespire and Redguard.

I'd rather have a lifetime supply of paint to watch dry.

and the complete anthology is missing Battlespire and Redguard.

haafie

Aren't Arena and Daggerfall supposed to suck?  Which would make Morrowind the only REALLY good one. XD

Aren't Arena and Daggerfall supposed to suck?  Which would make Morrowind the only REALLY good one. XD

NeonNinja

Aren't Arena and Daggerfall supposed to suck?  Which would make Morrowind the only REALLY good one. XD

NeonNinja

After Skyrim i can't see myself playing Morrowind,Oblivion or any other ES ever again.

They might be superior games(story and gameplay wise) but they are way too dated to be played again.

Adding graphical mods will only make them run like shit and crash constantly since their engine is ancient,unstable and unoptimized.(talking about morrowind and oblivion here)

It would be pointless for me since I already have all of that with exception of Arena and the latest Skyrim DLC.

Daggerfall doesn't suck btw, it's arguably the deepest game in the series along with Morrowind.  Also you can get it for free from Bethesda's own site so check it out if you haven't.  It's also absolutely massive compared to the other games in series.  

I've played the Elder Scrolls since Morrowind like crazy. Too many other games to play for me to replay those. I love them but not enough to replay them unless there really aren't any other games I'm interested in.

It's not a great deal. Two of those games are free, and you could pick up Morrowind and Oblivion for $5ish each every few months, so it's really just a question of whether you mind spending $70 for Skyrim and a few maps.Planeforger

After Skyrim i can't see myself playing Morrowind,Oblivion or any other ES ever again.

They might be superior games(story and gameplay wise) but they are way too dated to be played again.

Adding graphical mods will only make them run like shit and crash constantly since their engine is ancient,unstable and unoptimized.(talking about morrowind and oblivion here)

ShepardCommandr

Having played most of Skyrim and Oblivion, I'm not sure I would want to regress to the other games (at least graphically).

Having played most of Skyrim and Oblivion, I'm not sure I would want to regress to the other games (at least graphically).

worldalpha

[QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

Aren't Arena and Daggerfall supposed to suck?  Which would make Morrowind the only REALLY good one. XD

Allicrombie

I had read that it was massive (Moreso than any of the other Scrolls games) but only because a lot of content was copy/pasted throughout the game.  Is that true?

[QUOTE="Allicrombie"][QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

Aren't Arena and Daggerfall supposed to suck?  Which would make Morrowind the only REALLY good one. XD

NeonNinja

I had read that it was massive (Moreso than any of the other Scrolls games) but only because a lot of content was copy/pasted throughout the game.  Is that true?

From the wiki:

the scale of the game is twice the size of Great Britain:[2] around 487,000 square kilometers/ 188,000 sq miles. The game world features over 15,000 towns, cities, villages, and dungeons for the player's character to explore. According to Todd Howard, game director and executive producer for Bethesda, the game's sequel, The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind, is 0.01% the size of Daggerfall, but most of Daggerfall's terrain was randomly generated. Vvardenfell, the explorable part of Morrowind in the third game has 10 square miles (25.9 square kilometers).[3][4]The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has approximately 16 square miles (41.4 square kilometers) to explore.[5] In Daggerfall, there are 750,000+ non-player characters (NPCs) for the player to interact with, compared to the count of around 1,000 NPCs found in Morrowind and Oblivion. However, the geography and the characters in these later games are much more detailed.

[QUOTE="worldalpha"]

Having played most of Skyrim and Oblivion, I'm not sure I would want to regress to the other games (at least graphically).

KHAndAnime

[QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

[QUOTE="Allicrombie"] Daggerfall is massive. I spent like 300+ hrs playing that.wis3boi

I had read that it was massive (Moreso than any of the other Scrolls games) but only because a lot of content was copy/pasted throughout the game.  Is that true?

From the wiki:

the scale of the game is twice the size of Great Britain:[2] around 487,000 square kilometers/ 188,000 sq miles. The game world features over 15,000 towns, cities, villages, and dungeons for the player's character to explore. According to Todd Howard, game director and executive producer for Bethesda, the game's sequel, The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind, is 0.01% the size of Daggerfall, but most of Daggerfall's terrain was randomly generated. Vvardenfell, the explorable part of Morrowind in the third game has 10 square miles (25.9 square kilometers).[3][4]The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has approximately 16 square miles (41.4 square kilometers) to explore.[5] In Daggerfall, there are 750,000+ non-player characters (NPCs) for the player to interact with, compared to the count of around 1,000 NPCs found in Morrowind and Oblivion. However, the geography and the characters in these later games are much more detailed.

Well, that explained a lot.  Randomly generated adventures in a massive land sounds kind of interesting.