Forget the 8800...Forget the G92...The R700 is what you are looking for (link)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Dopemonk736
Dopemonk736

2731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Dopemonk736
Member since 2006 • 2731 Posts

http://news.softpedia.com/news/ATI-039-s-R700-to-support-DirectX-10-1-55321.shtml 

Yes, it's the R700, said to support DX 10.1, later to be possibly renamed DX11. DX10 may be obselete too soon. Whatever it is, this must be one beast. Is this ATi's trick up its sleeve to destroy the G92? Maybe, just maybe. Check this baby out.

I am getting this card, as long as it doesn't fail like the R600

Question: An ATi card will work with an intel mobo and cpu right? JW because I know ATi and AMD merged.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

LOL, we have no clue what Nvidia or Ati cards are about on the hardware side. So it's story that say's absolutly nothing.

Just like the 2900xtx was supposed to kill G80. 

And yes any motherboard support ati/nivdia video card with intel/amd processor.

Avatar image for Dopemonk736
Dopemonk736

2731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Dopemonk736
Member since 2006 • 2731 Posts

LOL, we have no clue what Nvidia or Ati cards are about on the hardware side. So it's story that say's absolutly nothing.

Just like the 2900xtx was supposed to kill G80. 

And yes any motherboard support ati/nivdia video card with intel/amd processor.

Bebi_vegeta

ya but the card already supports DX10.1 (possibly a.k.a. DX11), which is something no Nvidia cards have shown they support it.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

LOL, we have no clue what Nvidia or Ati cards are about on the hardware side. So it's story that say's absolutly nothing.

Just like the 2900xtx was supposed to kill G80.

And yes any motherboard support ati/nivdia video card with intel/amd processor.

Dopemonk736

ya but the card already supports DX10.1 (possibly a.k.a. DX11), which is something no Nvidia cards have shown they support it.

no one knows what Dx10.1 is or what it does. 

Avatar image for MondoCool
MondoCool

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 MondoCool
Member since 2007 • 866 Posts
[QUOTE="Dopemonk736"]

http://news.softpedia.com/news/ATI-039-s-R700-to-support-DirectX-10-1-55321.shtml

Yes, it's the R700, said to support DX 10.1, later to be possibly renamed DX11. DX10 may be obselete too soon. Whatever it is, this must be one beast. Is this ATi's trick up its sleeve to destroy the G92? Maybe, just maybe. Check this baby out.

I am getting this card, as long as it doesn't fail like the R600

Question: An ATi card will work with an intel mobo and cpu right? JW because I know ATi and AMD merged.

Axecident

ATI sux

Thats your comment no other info, stop posting useless crap. I myself am excited to see what happens next with this video card. 

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

Let us see some real world benchmarks before we clain the newest best card. I just can't belive that a 3rd company doesn't see all the mistakes ATI/AMD and Nvidia are making and come in to control the video card market. I guess the profit margin is to slim.roulettethedog

Where are these mistakes?

Avatar image for rere252
rere252

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 rere252
Member since 2005 • 232 Posts

multi core gpu..

1core entry

2cores mainstream

4-8cores high end.... that high end thing is going to be very very hot.... they will need a VERY nice cooling solution 

Avatar image for ATLReppa770
ATLReppa770

4208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ATLReppa770
Member since 2005 • 4208 Posts

multi core gpu..

1core entry

2cores mainstream

4-8cores high end.... that high end thing is going to be very very hot.... they will need a VERY nice cooling solution 

rere252

Throw a very high price onto that to.

Avatar image for ForlornHope
ForlornHope

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 ForlornHope
Member since 2006 • 1809 Posts

http://news.softpedia.com/news/ATI-039-s-R700-to-support-DirectX-10-1-55321.shtml

Yes, it's the R700, said to support DX 10.1, later to be possibly renamed DX11. DX10 may be obselete too soon. Whatever it is, this must be one beast. Is this ATi's trick up its sleeve to destroy the G92? Maybe, just maybe. Check this baby out.

I am getting this card, as long as it doesn't fail like the R600

Question: An ATi card will work with an intel mobo and cpu right? JW because I know ATi and AMD merged.

Dopemonk736

 

This has the distinct and heady aroma of SPAM! 

Avatar image for ForlornHope
ForlornHope

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 ForlornHope
Member since 2006 • 1809 Posts
[QUOTE="Dopemonk736"]

http://news.softpedia.com/news/ATI-039-s-R700-to-support-DirectX-10-1-55321.shtml

Yes, it's the R700, said to support DX 10.1, later to be possibly renamed DX11. DX10 may be obselete too soon. Whatever it is, this must be one beast. Is this ATi's trick up its sleeve to destroy the G92? Maybe, just maybe. Check this baby out.

I am getting this card, as long as it doesn't fail like the R600

Question: An ATi card will work with an intel mobo and cpu right? JW because I know ATi and AMD merged.

Axecident

ATI sux

 

For now, yes. 

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

ATI/AMD has let Nvidia have the high end Dx10 card market for way to long and Nvidia's 8600 and lower mid range cards are nothing to brag about letting ATI/AMD a chance to grab market share. I just see procrastination by ATI/AMD and Nvidia looking at just right now. Is this something new or is this the pattern of these two companies before the last 2+ years that I have followed the video card market?roulettethedog

This is new...

Anyways, there is relatively no money to gain from the highend marketshare. Actually, most of the time, there is a lot of loss when going after the highend market. Seeing as how AMD needs cash, they decided to forgo the highend market and go after the most profitable area, the low-mid highend. 

multi core gpu..
1core entry
2cores mainstream
4-8cores high end.... that high end thing is going to be very very hot.... they will need a VERY nice cooling solutionrere252

Not necessarily. Say these cores are the current RV630 cores (the highend ones), they are currently using about 45w. 4 of those would actually put it right around the R600's power consumption. Now if they make even more improvements or use even lesser cores, then power consumption will drop even farther and 8cores could be possible.

price onto that to.ATLReppa770

Again, not necessarily. It will be cheaper to make for two reasons. First, these cores are going to be much more simpler then a a current mid-highend card. Second, due to all of AMD's GPUs using these cores, only one design needs to be made and produced. Meaning no unnecessary retooling and the huge mass production of these will drastically cut costs.

 

Avatar image for Glordit
Glordit

1525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#15 Glordit
Member since 2005 • 1525 Posts

:cry: and I am still on Dx9! Well in a Recent Valve Hardware Survey 1% showed to have DX10 that took the survey! so, now why would we all rush to get Dx10.1? :O IMO it should be like DX9.0a/b/c having a whole new DX10.1 will cause chaos amongst delelopers! 

So getting a DX10 card is not realy worth it? w/ DX10.1 comming out in Q4 2008?

Then again looking at the Article,  They say that the R650 would be better than the R600, but if a "Daul Core" GPU = Mid range WELL I AM IN!!

Avatar image for TheDarthvader
TheDarthvader

7916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#16 TheDarthvader
Member since 2002 • 7916 Posts
DX 11? Sorry but thats utter BS
Avatar image for 450tantrum
450tantrum

158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 450tantrum
Member since 2005 • 158 Posts

Well from what i've seen in the past several months, Nvidia is more tech savy especially when it comes down to executeing hardware projects, And They clearly have more money in the Bank.

Hence, I dont see why Nvidia would not have an Answer to ATI's R700 line. The ones who are willing to wait for the R700, there maybe a G100 line right around the corner from that from Nvidia for you to wait for too, who knows.

Where Am I Getting:  Technology Will Always Become Obsolete and Sometimes Even At An Acclerated Rate, So Get What You Can, When You Can Get It And Enjoy It Because Whether We Like It or Not Something Bigger And Better Is Always Comming.

Why "Forget the 88...the G92... and shoot for R700" ... its inevitable change

I could easily say "If your willing to wait for R700, Go for G100" which would be right around the corner

But hey, This is just my opinion

Avatar image for Targzissian
Targzissian

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 Targzissian
Member since 2003 • 1228 Posts
I read an article about DirectX 10.1 a few months ago.  Basically, it looks to me like Microsoft wants to standardize the way DirectX compatible hardware operates even more than they have already done with DirectX 10.  That will make it easier for game developers and hardware developers to do their job, because they will all be playing by the same rules.  On the other hand, it may stifle innovation in certain areas by constraining the way things can be done.  In any case, there are hardly any games yet that can even run in DirectX 10, and I doubt we'll see games that use DirectX 10.1 for another year or two at least.  So I say don't worry about any of that stuff for at least another year.
Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts

Well from what i've seen in the past several months, Nvidia is more tech savy especially when it comes down to executeing hardware projects, And They clearly have more money in the Bank.

Hence, I dont see why Nvidia would not have an Answer to ATI's R700 line. The ones who are willing to wait for the R700, there maybe a G100 line right around the corner from that from Nvidia for you to wait for too, who knows.

Where Am I Getting:  Technology Will Always Become Obsolete and Sometimes Even At An Acclerated Rate, So Get What You Can, When You Can Get It And Enjoy It Because Whether We Like It or Not Something Bigger And Better Is Always Comming.

Why "Forget the 88...the G92... and shoot for R700" ... its inevitable change

I could easily say "If your willing to wait for R700, Go for G100" which would be right around the corner

But hey, This is just my opinion

450tantrum

Exactly. And if you will wait for G100, you might can wait for new ATi cards after R700. This is a cycle that never ends. I think that i bought my PC at the right time. I have it for 7 months now and it isnt outdated. What a luck. Most of the components gets outdated pretty fast today.  

Avatar image for Macolele
Macolele

534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Macolele
Member since 2006 • 534 Posts
 DX11 is so far. Perhaps I get a G92 first.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

the release time between dx10 and this new version is too small for it to be dx11 it would not be able to be made in 12 months dx10.1 however is possible.

Personaly i see a conspiricy theory coming on: microsoft is churning out new versions of Dx to get graphics card sales from manufactures that they have comission deals with so with the sale of every new dx supporting graphics card Microsoft takes a commision.

no point buying new cards anyway there probably won't be much improvement any way, possibly upgrade to a new graphics card every 2 versions of dx if they are going to release them this quickly

Avatar image for jjj13
jjj13

2399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#23 jjj13
Member since 2005 • 2399 Posts
Is that site a thrusted site?
Avatar image for ATLReppa770
ATLReppa770

4208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ATLReppa770
Member since 2005 • 4208 Posts

Is that site a thrusted site?jjj13

It's a trusted site, not a thrusted one.

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#25 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
So, to reiterate my question... What the hell new feature in DirectX 10.1 is going to make it so much better than DirectX 10 (or 9.0c for that matter) to justify putting up with Windows Vista?
Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts

So, to reiterate my question... What the hell new feature in DirectX 10.1 is going to make it so much better than DirectX 10 (or 9.0c for that matter) to justify putting up with Windows Vista?codezer0

Well it will use that tech on G80 and R600, like teselation..... I think that G80 and R600 will be compatible whit it.

Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
Ati is teh lame
Avatar image for ncderek
ncderek

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#28 ncderek
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
and this is why the rig in my sig will be the last gaming rig, its become nonsence keeping up with it
Avatar image for JSDempsey
JSDempsey

1803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 JSDempsey
Member since 2006 • 1803 Posts
just start saving 10 dollars a week now and you can get a hell of a powerful GPU when DX10.1/11 actually does come out. No worries. Im just getting the 8800 soon and that will last me untill then if not longer.
Avatar image for ForlornHope
ForlornHope

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 ForlornHope
Member since 2006 • 1809 Posts

and this is why the rig in my sig will be the last gaming rig, its become nonsence keeping up with itncderek

indeed thats why i never bother tryigmn i just upgarde when i need to like how im buying a amd 5200 x2 next week :D

Avatar image for MadExponent
MadExponent

11454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MadExponent
Member since 2003 • 11454 Posts
The additions to the DX10 codepath to make it DX10.1 are very minimal. Current DX10 cards like the R600 and G80 are fully capable of running the DX10.1 codepath. Not that big of a deal really.
Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

The additions to the DX10 codepath to make it DX10.1 are very minimal. Current DX10 cards like the R600 and G80 are fully capable of running the DX10.1 codepath. Not that big of a deal really.MadExponent

Not really... DX10.1 will include tessellation which the G80 cannot do...

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
The additions to the DX10 codepath to make it DX10.1 are very minimal. Current DX10 cards like the R600 and G80 are fully capable of running the DX10.1 codepath. Not that big of a deal really.MadExponent
it's probably going to be like DX9.0C with Shader Model 3. The 9700/9800 series cards supported DX9 just fine and were out before its official release (iirc.. maybe right alongside it) with SM2, but then later on SM3 was tagged on. None of those cards could handle SM3 anyway.
Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts
I hate hearing people call the R600 a flop. The 2900xt 512mb is tying and beating the 8800gtx 768mb with new drivers and its $425usd. Now we will see what the 2900xtx 1gb can do with new drivers.

The R700 is a monster same with the G90. But comeo n people, theyre more then 6 months away. You always hear new tech for every 6 months. So you keep saying "Imma wait" well you will always be waiting.
Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts

[QUOTE="MadExponent"]The additions to the DX10 codepath to make it DX10.1 are very minimal. Current DX10 cards like the R600 and G80 are fully capable of running the DX10.1 codepath. Not that big of a deal really.LordEC911

Not really... DX10.1 will include tessellation which the G80 cannot do...

I was reading about that on Rage3D a week ago.