http://www.computerandvideogames.com/317135/modern-warfare-3-confirmed-for-steamworks/ (Gamespot still won't let me link it)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/317135/modern-warfare-3-confirmed-for-steamworks/ (Gamespot still won't let me link it)
I'm still fine with COD4 to be honest. Even then there are other FPS I would normally rather play, than a COD-style game.
I still feel that Activision owes me a game after I bought the crap that was MW2. SF_KiLLaMaNI bought that game used and played hundreds of hours on it. Activision don't owe you or me a thing.
I still feel that Activision owes me a game after I bought the crap that was MW2. No, I will not be buying MW3, which will most likely be more crap from IW. CoD4 was good but then they ruined everything that was good about it in MW2.SF_KiLLaMaN
Care to elaborate? I personally think the game stagnated in innovation after MW1, not deteriorated (other than the lack ofdedicated servers andmod support, that is).
[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]I still feel that Activision owes me a game after I bought the crap that was MW2. No, I will not be buying MW3, which will most likely be more crap from IW. CoD4 was good but then they ruined everything that was good about it in MW2.ravenguard90
Care to elaborate? I personally think the game stagnated in innovation after MW1, not deteriorated (other than the lack ofdedicated servers andmod support, that is).
I agree, I don't think MW2 was deterioration in comparison to MW1, just a little stale.
However, I do feel that black ops was a deteriorated mess, the performance of that game was just crappy.
I am glad however that MW3 will be on Steam, and will have dedicated servers. (If it looks fun, I may give it a go)
[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]I still feel that Activision owes me a game after I bought the crap that was MW2. No, I will not be buying MW3, which will most likely be more crap from IW. CoD4 was good but then they ruined everything that was good about it in MW2.ravenguard90
Care to elaborate? I personally think the game stagnated in innovation after MW1, not deteriorated (other than the lack ofdedicated servers andmod support, that is).
they added a ton of stuff that pretty much ruined the game. They went over board with the kill streaks, added stupid perks like commando, added stupid weapons like the throwing knives and the cheap shottys, and not to mention the stupid death streaks. Also the campaign was a joke. Not only was it way too short, it was ridiculous and full of plot holes. A 4th grader could have written a better story for MW2 than IW did. I could write a 2 page paper on what was wrong with MW2, but I'll spare you the wall of text.I feel kinda bad saying it, but yeah I will get it. I like the stupidness of the MW campaigns and Spec-Ops is super fun. And maybe, just maybe, the MP isn't completely ****** this time.
Same here :S u sooooo rightI'm skipping this one.
Not because of Steamworks, but because MW2 was awful.
broken_bass_bin
LOL this thread would be so different if posted on ps3/x360 section :D
Uhhh mw3 got biggah gunnazz with lazer beamzzz so mega coool and therz more stuff like big choppahs n a lethal spoon!!! ¬¬
Steamworks integration was one of the things that REALLY put me off MW2. VAC plain out sucked (I'm told it's been improved). The way how VAC worked, letting hackers continue for a couple of weeks, before getting banned, was a joke.
People actually trying to say VAC is better than PB. PB has problems, but nothing like what VAC has/did.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment