Can a 1920x1080 Monitor play 1920x1200?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

Topic. I'm just curious because if I get a monitor that is 1920x1080 (this is full HD right?), don't most games use the 1200 resolution? I was just curious if this would mess anything up.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
No.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
So, then look for a 1920x1200 monitor, or go a higher resolution?
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
So, then look for a 1920x1200 monitor, or go a higher resolution?LordsLoss
Niether, go with the 1080p monitor. Games support 1080p just fine...
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
[QUOTE="LordsLoss"]So, then look for a 1920x1200 monitor, or go a higher resolution?-GeordiLaForge-
Niether, go with the 1080p monitor. Games support 1080p just fine...

Ah, ok then. Thanks.
Avatar image for jtcraft
jtcraft

2770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jtcraft
Member since 2005 • 2770 Posts
No. Most games run at multiple resolutions so it doesn't matter what resolution you have. Occasionally, a game will come out that only supports certain resolutions but it is rare. Older games often don't support widescreen resolutions simply because at the time of their development widescreen monitors were rare and most moniters were 4:3. And 1920x1080 is one of the most popular resolutions, if not the most popular.
Avatar image for andyroo08
andyroo08

2082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 andyroo08
Member since 2004 • 2082 Posts

No because a 1080p monitor is only 1080 pixels high. Anyway, I'm yet to come across a game that won't run a 1080p.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

get 1920x1200 because it is better.

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
No, LCD monitors can't display resolutions higher than their native resolution. However, you don't need to worry about games not supporting 1080p either. Nearly all modern games support 4:3, 16:10, and 16:9 aspect ratios. Even in the event your aspect ratio doesn't fit one of those, most games will also offer your native resolution as a choice. For example, my native resolution is 6004x1080 (a bezel corrected tri-monitor resolution which is why the number looks so weird) and most games I play actually support it, either with a hack or out-of-the-box (even a game as old as HL2 supports it). 1920x1080 is a very common resolution though, far more common than 1920x1200 actually, so rest assured every game you play (unless it's a really old one) will support that resolution.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

I found this one. Does anyone know of a 1920x1200 under $200 that is pretty good? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236051

Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
No. It doesn't fit. And it's for that very reason I refuse to buy a monitor limited to only 1080 lines vertically. I still play a fair share of old games whose highest resolution options are 1600x1200 and 1280x1024. Why would a brand new monitor not have a resolution just tall enough to fit 1600x1200? It's just ridiculous... But what's even more ridiculous would be the price premiums they're charging for 1920x1200 displays now (brand new ones, anyway). At least they still tend to be the higher-end S-PVA or IPS varieties, which makes the cost not as bad when you know what you're getting in terms of image quality. If you need to keep the cost down, though, buy used. Find an old Dell 2405FPW, 2407WFP, or so on eBay or craigslist.
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
[QUOTE="NamelessPlayer"]No. It doesn't fit. And it's for that very reason I refuse to buy a monitor limited to only 1080 lines vertically. I still play a fair share of old games whose highest resolution options are 1600x1200 and 1280x1024. Why would a brand new monitor not have a resolution just tall enough to fit 1600x1200? It's just ridiculous... But what's even more ridiculous would be the price premiums they're charging for 1920x1200 displays now (brand new ones, anyway). At least they still tend to be the higher-end S-PVA or IPS varieties, which makes the cost not as bad when you know what you're getting in terms of image quality. If you need to keep the cost down, though, buy used. Find an old Dell 2405FPW, 2407WFP, or so on eBay or craigslist.

You do realize that 1600x1200 an 1280x1024 are 4:3 resolutions, yes? The horizontal scaling is going to be of much greater concern than the vertical scaling. Even on a 1920x1200 monitor those games are going to be nearly unplayable thanks to the horizontal stretching. Also, for gaming you want to have as much horizontal space as possible since there's usually far more going on to your sides than there is above and below you. Thus, 16:9 is better than 16:10 for gaming. Same goes for movies and TV shows.
Avatar image for Decrate
Decrate

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Decrate
Member since 2004 • 1731 Posts

get 1920x1080

trust me on this, its future proof better than any other resolution if you want compatability

if you think about the fact that the witcher 2, a recent high quality game, was released and only supported 16:9 resolutions (1920x1080), and not 16:10 (1920x1200)

it just shows that some devs are still thinking with consoles in their mind, ie 16:9 resolutions, so do yourself a favor to prevent troubles

(i know a patch was released to fix the problem but still, why wait months for a patch when you could just get a 16:9 monitor)

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

You do realize that 1600x1200 an 1280x1024 are 4:3 resolutions, yes? The horizontal scaling is going to be of much greater concern than the vertical scaling. Even on a 1920x1200 monitor those games are going to be nearly unplayable thanks to the horizontal stretching. gameguy6700

You know you can turn off horizontal stretching so that the screen displays the image at the correct aspect ratio, yes?

Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
[QUOTE="gameguy6700"][QUOTE="NamelessPlayer"]No. It doesn't fit. And it's for that very reason I refuse to buy a monitor limited to only 1080 lines vertically. I still play a fair share of old games whose highest resolution options are 1600x1200 and 1280x1024. Why would a brand new monitor not have a resolution just tall enough to fit 1600x1200? It's just ridiculous... But what's even more ridiculous would be the price premiums they're charging for 1920x1200 displays now (brand new ones, anyway). At least they still tend to be the higher-end S-PVA or IPS varieties, which makes the cost not as bad when you know what you're getting in terms of image quality. If you need to keep the cost down, though, buy used. Find an old Dell 2405FPW, 2407WFP, or so on eBay or craigslist.

You do realize that 1600x1200 an 1280x1024 are 4:3 resolutions, yes? The horizontal scaling is going to be of much greater concern than the vertical scaling. Even on a 1920x1200 monitor those games are going to be nearly unplayable thanks to the horizontal stretching. Also, for gaming you want to have as much horizontal space as possible since there's usually far more going on to your sides than there is above and below you. Thus, 16:9 is better than 16:10 for gaming. Same goes for movies and TV shows.

As broken_bass_bin states, you can change the scaling options so it doesn't screw up the aspect ratio, like it should be. Your argument is invalid. And for the widescreen argument, there's nothing stopping you from running 1920x1080 on a 1920x1200 monitor at all. As I just pointed out, aspect ratio is preserved, so you get a little extra FOV without aspect ratio distortion...if it's a proper H+ game that expands horizontal FOV. However, there are older games that, while supporting widescreen resolutions, are V-, which means the horizontal FOV is fixed and you LOSE vertical FOV. In that case, it's better to run 4:3, possibly even 5:4. Personally, I wouldn't be so opposed to 16:9 if they just expanded the horizontal resolution a little more instead of sacrificing vertical resolution. New products are supposed to IMPROVE features, NOT regress, and 1920x1080 coming from 1920x1200 is exactly that: a regression. Maybe when they bring out the 3840x2160 monitors, I'll reconsider 16:9 since that resolution can fit 1600x1200 and then some, but something tells me the HDTV industry will continue to hold things back for a while there.

get 1920x1080

trust me on this, its future proof better than any other resolution if you want compatability

if you think about the fact that the witcher 2, a recent high quality game, was released and only supported 16:9 resolutions (1920x1080), and not 16:10 (1920x1200)

it just shows that some devs are still thinking with consoles in their mind, ie 16:9 resolutions, so do yourself a favor to prevent troubles

(i know a patch was released to fix the problem but still, why wait months for a patch when you could just get a 16:9 monitor)

Decrate
As I already pointed out, you can run 16:9 resolutions on 16:10 monitors. No, the letterboxing doesn't disturb me one bit.
Avatar image for middle-earth88
middle-earth88

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 middle-earth88
Member since 2006 • 1262 Posts

Games that support 1200p support 1080p. Games that don't support 1080p usually dont support 1200p either.

Avatar image for middle-earth88
middle-earth88

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 middle-earth88
Member since 2006 • 1262 Posts

get 1920x1080

trust me on this, its future proof better than any other resolution if you want compatability

if you think about the fact that the witcher 2, a recent high quality game, was released and only supported 16:9 resolutions (1920x1080), and not 16:10 (1920x1200)

it just shows that some devs are still thinking with consoles in their mind, ie 16:9 resolutions, so do yourself a favor to prevent troubles

(i know a patch was released to fix the problem but still, why wait months for a patch when you could just get a 16:9 monitor)

Decrate

WRONG The Witcher 2 DOES support 16:10. I ran it at 1440x900.

Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
I'll just go with the Asus 1920x1080. Thank you.