Would robots also need a Bill of Rights in the future? Why or why not?

Avatar image for aryannalao
AryannaLao

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By AryannaLao
Member since 2019 • 78 Posts

What if robots finally become sentient? Should we treat robots like humans? Would they need a Bill of Rights to protect them when that time comes? Why or why not?

Avatar image for gmak2442
GMAK2442

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 GMAK2442
Member since 2015 • 967 Posts

I now say it's possible that the robots become conscientious. This mean they should have their right too.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

79420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#3 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 79420 Posts

Detroit: Beyond Human explored this topic very well. If robots are going to build themselves, they'll build themselves to be better than we are and thus, it would be in the human's best interest to get along with these robots or there will be an uprising.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

2556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#4 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 2556 Posts

If they become sentient. Then yes. They have to have rights giving TC questions. but this subject completely depends on of they have feelings or not and how they are programmed. It's something to be sentient and another to have emotions. A completely logical being would be horrible and a emotional mess is equally as horrible. I guess we will cross this bridge when we get to it or if they are allowed to get to that stage.

Avatar image for thereal25
thereal25

1844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 thereal25
Member since 2011 • 1844 Posts

Slightly off topic perhaps, but the funny thing about current ai technology is that it's MUCH more impressive in some areas than others.

For example it can play a mean game of chess (and I mean really mean) but try holding a conversation with it.

Afaik, even the most advanced "conversation bots" are thoroughly unconvincing and unimpressive.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

14542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 14542 Posts

I’d say the value of life that rights stem from isn’t based on sentience, but of the intrinsic value of life itself. To grant them rights is to equivocate that which is unequivocal.

Would we even have the right ourselves to grant them rights? If they’re sentient, then why would they need us? They could do it on their own based on their own existence.

An interesting question, though.

Avatar image for davillain-
DaVillain-

38490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 DaVillain-  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 38490 Posts

The movie "I Robot" movie starring Will Smith did something similar regarding 3 rules for Robots in that movie. I will admit, that movie prove us that Humanity isn't ready for sentient robots just yet.

Avatar image for pyro1245
pyro1245

5359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By pyro1245
Member since 2003 • 5359 Posts

I don't see robots as equivalent to a thing that might have artificial life, and I don't think artificial life will be limited to just robots.

I would hope that whatever artificial life we create can tell the difference as well.

Yes artificial life should have inalienable rights.

That said I know we're not ready for that as a species so we should not attempt to create artificial life. I think it's a far cry from the machine learning algorithms we create now anyways.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

35928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 35928 Posts

how are we even defining sentience or consciousness in this sense?

if we can't even clearly define it, how do we judge it to be so and deserving of any inherent rights beyond that of property of its owner?

Avatar image for crimsonbrute
CrimsonBrute

25498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#10 CrimsonBrute  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 25498 Posts

The way things have been going, it won't be long before it will be forced upon us.

Avatar image for DEVILinIRON
DEVILinIRON

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 DEVILinIRON  Online
Member since 2006 • 5120 Posts

I believe so. Especially for future robot wives.

Avatar image for disgrace
Disgrace

17

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#12 Disgrace
Member since 2019 • 17 Posts

@DEVILinIRON: future robot wives, interesting.