World War III is coming. Pick a side!!!!!!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Uncle_Uzi
Uncle_Uzi

1371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Uncle_Uzi
Member since 2007 • 1371 Posts

Who would win World War 3?

All sides sign a treaty at the outbreak of conflict agreeing to ban the use of Nuclear weapons.

Like men, the leaders of these nations understand that if they cannot win through conventional military might alone, they do not deserve victory.

So who would win? NATO and its allies vs. the PRC, Russia and pissed off middle eastern nations (I'm pointing at you, Iran).

Consider the situation right now: While we may not have the most populous armed service in the world, Uncle Sam sure as hell has the most capable one that has ever existed. Sure we have a hard time with counterinsurgency, but who the hell else doesn't? With the technology and willpower to annihilateany foe that presents itself, the Bald Eagle proves to be currently the most intimidating warrior on the planet.

The PLA doesn't exactly have a long or distinguished record of valorous deeds and heroic victories, but MY GOD THERE ARE AN ASSLOAD OF THEM.

Them Ruskies... well, be scared fellow Americans. Remember this: We didn't beat Hitler alone. And also realize this: There's an ancient conflict that lasted more than fifty years between two legendary super powers, and Russia was one of them. We've been f***ing terrified by these people for almost 25% of the time our nation has existed.

It's a tough call. But who do you think would win?

Avatar image for cd_rom
cd_rom

13951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 cd_rom
Member since 2003 • 13951 Posts
I predict a banning!
Avatar image for Uncle_Uzi
Uncle_Uzi

1371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 Uncle_Uzi
Member since 2007 • 1371 Posts

Oh yeah you also gotta give a reason why a certain side would win. Make it funny or serious, I don't care, just make sure it's worth my time.

Avatar image for spawnassasin
spawnassasin

18702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 spawnassasin
Member since 2006 • 18702 Posts

its me against the world baby8)

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

Depends on what they want, why they're fighting. If it's territory like it was in WWI+II I say the others, although I seriously doubt they would ally like that. Those nations historically have been the hardest to invade. If it's about something else, harder to say. More than likely they would be fighting over resources, i.e. oil, and then you still get the homefield advantage, although the defenders' success in those countries hasn't necessarily been defending strategic positions but rather wearing the opponent out during their occupation.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
why do we assume nato stays together
Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

In War, no parties involved win, especially nuclear war.

Avatar image for Uncle_Uzi
Uncle_Uzi

1371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 Uncle_Uzi
Member since 2007 • 1371 Posts

In War, no parties involved win, especially nuclear war.

DarkGamer007

Did you even read my ****ing post?

Avatar image for justletmesignup
justletmesignup

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 justletmesignup
Member since 2004 • 161 Posts

France doesn't count as NATO, right?

What about India. India has nukes too.

I'd pick duck and cover, hell that ad just speaks to me.

I'd pick Russia, huge landmass = more hiding space. Plus America is an easy target for ICBMs. Even if a side 'won', there'd be nuclear winter, every one would die any way.

Wait, I didn't see the no nuke business. Well in that case, the side who is about to lose would use nukes any way.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
[QUOTE="Uncle_Uzi"]

[QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

In War, no parties involved win, especially nuclear war.

Did you even read my ****ing post?

no matter what..when one side is losing they will use nukes.
Avatar image for shadowprince92
shadowprince92

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#11 shadowprince92
Member since 2005 • 1420 Posts

If the West stayed together, it would be little contest.

Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts

"The Rest"

Come on, seriously?

Avatar image for m0zart
m0zart

11580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#13 m0zart
Member since 2003 • 11580 Posts

Uh... you knew better.