Why aren't gun-lovers lobbying for the right to own rocket launchers?

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Chickity_China
#1 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

If you're gonna defend yourself against a tyrannical government in this day and age, then you should have the right to own the weapons necessary to destroy tanks and fighter jets.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
#3 Posted by comp_atkins (34682 posts) -
where's my personal missile defense system??!?
Avatar image for Fightingfan
#4 Posted by Fightingfan (38011 posts) -

Rocket launchers are legal; they simply require the right paperwork.

How do you think St. Augustine(Castillo de San Marcos) still uses Cannons daily? Construction crew use TNT too, so explosives are legal.

Avatar image for Zeviander
#5 Posted by Zeviander (9503 posts) -
Because I'm sure they are already legal to own, you just need the proper permits. They just cost a small fortune (not including the ammunition). Edit: *shakes fist at fightingfan*
Avatar image for whipassmt
#6 Posted by whipassmt (15375 posts) -

Because I'm sure they are already legal to own, you just need the proper permits. They just cost a small fortune (not including the ammunition). Edit: *shakes fist at fightingfan*Zeviander
I wonder what it's like to take one of those things to a firing range, I wonder if the people nearby get shocked at the noise.

Avatar image for Chickity_China
#7 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

Rocket launchers are legal; they simply require the right paperwork.

How do you think St. Augustine(Castillo de San Marcos) still uses Cannons daily? Construction crew use TNT too, so explosives are legal.

Fightingfan

You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.

Avatar image for KiIIyou
#8 Posted by KiIIyou (27180 posts) -
I play with my rocket launcher everyday.
Avatar image for MrPraline
#9 Posted by MrPraline (21351 posts) -
Owning a rocket launcher + indefinite detention of "suspected" "terrorists" that seems awfully dangerous
Avatar image for Zeviander
#10 Posted by Zeviander (9503 posts) -
You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.Chickity_China
Guess that rules out SMAWs.
Avatar image for Fightingfan
#11 Posted by Fightingfan (38011 posts) -

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

Rocket launchers are legal; they simply require the right paperwork.

How do you think St. Augustine(Castillo de San Marcos) still uses Cannons daily? Construction crew use TNT too, so explosives are legal.

Chickity_China

You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.

Who's gonna make me unload it if I have one loaded?

Avatar image for Wasdie
#13 Posted by Wasdie (53500 posts) -

Dumb question, but those kind of this are technically legal, you just need the proper permits (just like fully automatic weapons).

The issue with explosives, especially military grade high explosives, isn't their use against other people, it's the proper storage and handling of such explosives. You can't just lock the up in a gun safe in your garage like you can with ammunition.

There is a reasonable level of control on harmful devices that we exercise on a daily basis in the interest of public safety. Modern ammunition and modern firearms do not just randomly go off. It's been declared safe to store locally, thus we can buy and sell them without having to have rigorous permits.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
#14 Posted by Fightingfan (38011 posts) -

Dumb question, but those kind of this are technically legal, you just need the proper permits (just like fully automatic weapons).

The issue with explosives, especially military grade high explosives, isn't their use against other people, it's the proper storage and handling of such explosives. You can't just lock the up in a gun safe in your garage like you can with ammunition.

Wasdie
That's what I'd assume as well; you would probably have to prove you have the means to store the explosions safely.
Avatar image for thegerg
#15 Posted by thegerg (18398 posts) -

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

Rocket launchers are legal; they simply require the right paperwork.

How do you think St. Augustine(Castillo de San Marcos) still uses Cannons daily? Construction crew use TNT too, so explosives are legal.

Chickity_China

You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.

Yes you can, as you have the proper permits, paperwork, taxstamps, background checks, etc.. Stop spreading misinformation. Ignorance FTL.
Avatar image for JML897
#16 Posted by JML897 (33134 posts) -
I want access to every weapon the government has.
Avatar image for Chickity_China
#17 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

Rocket launchers are legal; they simply require the right paperwork.

How do you think St. Augustine(Castillo de San Marcos) still uses Cannons daily? Construction crew use TNT too, so explosives are legal.

Fightingfan

You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.

Who's gonna make me unload it if I have one loaded?

You're breaking the law and paying a hefty fine or serving jail time, as with anyone who breaks the law.

Avatar image for Wasdie
#18 Posted by Wasdie (53500 posts) -

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Dumb question, but those kind of this are technically legal, you just need the proper permits (just like fully automatic weapons).

The issue with explosives, especially military grade high explosives, isn't their use against other people, it's the proper storage and handling of such explosives. You can't just lock the up in a gun safe in your garage like you can with ammunition.

Fightingfan

That's what I'd assume as well; you would probably have to prove you have the means to store the explosions safely.

Yeah, that red tape costs a boat load of money. So much so that the average person does not have the means to aquire them.

Avatar image for Chickity_China
#19 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

Rocket launchers are legal; they simply require the right paperwork.

How do you think St. Augustine(Castillo de San Marcos) still uses Cannons daily? Construction crew use TNT too, so explosives are legal.

thegerg

You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.

Yes you can, as you have the proper permits, paperwork, taxstamps, background checks, etc.. Stop spreading misinformation. Ignorance FTL.

And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right? I'm sure you can all afford that luxury during a revolution. Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets? That's what we all need.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
#20 Posted by Fightingfan (38011 posts) -

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.

Chickity_China

Yes you can, as you have the proper permits, paperwork, taxstamps, background checks, etc.. Stop spreading misinformation. Ignorance FTL.

And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right? I'm sure you can all afford that luxury during a revolution. Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets? That's what we all need.

It doesn't matter if we can't afford em, or if they're hard to obtain, it's having the legal right to obtain such things. I can't afford a Ferrari, lets ban Ferraris and give everyone a Toyota Corolla.
Avatar image for thegerg
#21 Posted by thegerg (18398 posts) -

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

You can't have a rocket launcher that's loaded.

Chickity_China

Yes you can, as you have the proper permits, paperwork, taxstamps, background checks, etc.. Stop spreading misinformation. Ignorance FTL.

And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right? I'm sure you can all afford that luxury during a revolution. Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets? That's what we all need.

Stop moving the goalposts. You're attempting to spread misinformation (either that or you're simply ignorant yourself) to other users in order to make some kind of point. It's childish and dishonest.
Avatar image for Chickity_China
#22 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Yes you can, as you have the proper permits, paperwork, taxstamps, background checks, etc.. Stop spreading misinformation. Ignorance FTL.Fightingfan

And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right? I'm sure you can all afford that luxury during a revolution. Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets? That's what we all need.

It doesn't matter if we can't afford em, or if they're hard to obtain, it's having the legal right to obtain such things. I can't afford a Ferrari, lets ban Ferraris and give everyone a Toyota Corolla.

They why are gun-lovers getting all up in arms over the new gun regulations making firearms harder to optain?

Avatar image for Chickity_China
#23 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Yes you can, as you have the proper permits, paperwork, taxstamps, background checks, etc.. Stop spreading misinformation. Ignorance FTL.thegerg

And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right? I'm sure you can all afford that luxury during a revolution. Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets? That's what we all need.

Stop moving the goalposts. You're attempting to spread misinformation (either that or you're simply ignorant yourself) to other users in order to make some kind of point. It's childish and dishonest.

Stop avoiding the question.

Avatar image for Chickity_China
#24 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Yes you can, as you have the proper permits, paperwork, taxstamps, background checks, etc.. Stop spreading misinformation. Ignorance FTL.Fightingfan

And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right? I'm sure you can all afford that luxury during a revolution. Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets? That's what we all need.

It doesn't matter if we can't afford em, or if they're hard to obtain, it's having the legal right to obtain such things. I can't afford a Ferrari, lets ban Ferraris and give everyone a Toyota Corolla.

They why are gun-lovers getting all up in arms over the new gun regulations making firearms harder to optain?

Avatar image for thegerg
#25 Posted by thegerg (18398 posts) -

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right? I'm sure you can all afford that luxury during a revolution. Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets? That's what we all need.

Chickity_China

Stop moving the goalposts. You're attempting to spread misinformation (either that or you're simply ignorant yourself) to other users in order to make some kind of point. It's childish and dishonest.

Stop avoiding the question.

Which question? "And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right?" That's not even a complete thought. Try constructing a real question. "Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets?" Because there are fewer of them available, and there is less of a demand. Making them easier to buy would artificially deflate their price, screwing over their owner. It would also be just plain silly from an economics standpoint. Flooding the market with something for which there is so little demand is pointless. I suggest that you take an introduction to economics course.
Avatar image for Chickity_China
#26 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Stop moving the goalposts. You're attempting to spread misinformation (either that or you're simply ignorant yourself) to other users in order to make some kind of point. It's childish and dishonest.thegerg

Stop avoiding the question.

Which question? "And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right?" That's not even a complete thought. Try constructing a real question. "Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets?" Because there are fewer of them available, and there is less of a demand. Making them easier to buy would artificially deflate their price, screwing over their owner. It would also be just plain silly from an economics standpoint. Flooding the market with something for which there is so little demand is pointless. I suggest that you take an introduction to economics course.

If there's low demand, the price would be low. You take an econ 101 course. Lol.

Avatar image for jackfruitchips
#27 Posted by jackfruitchips (1065 posts) -

I need teh missile launcher

Avatar image for thegerg
#28 Posted by thegerg (18398 posts) -

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

Stop avoiding the question.

Chickity_China

Which question? "And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right?" That's not even a complete thought. Try constructing a real question. "Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets?" Because there are fewer of them available, and there is less of a demand. Making them easier to buy would artificially deflate their price, screwing over their owner. It would also be just plain silly from an economics standpoint. Flooding the market with something for which there is so little demand is pointless. I suggest that you take an introduction to economics course.

If there's low demand, the price would be low. You take an econ 101 course. Lol.

The demand is low, but so is the supply. Thus, the price is still high.
Avatar image for MrPraline
#29 Posted by MrPraline (21351 posts) -

[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

Stop avoiding the question.

Chickity_China

Which question? "And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right?" That's not even a complete thought. Try constructing a real question. "Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets?" Because there are fewer of them available, and there is less of a demand. Making them easier to buy would artificially deflate their price, screwing over their owner. It would also be just plain silly from an economics standpoint. Flooding the market with something for which there is so little demand is pointless. I suggest that you take an introduction to economics course.

If there's low demand, the price would be low. You take an econ 101 course. Lol.

Not if there's almost no to no supply.
Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
#30 Posted by Legolas_Katarn (15556 posts) -

If you're gonna defend yourself against a tyrannical government in this day and age, then you should have the right to own the weapons necessary to destroy tanks and fighter jets.

Chickity_China

When the government comes to take our freedom and weapons we won't need rocket launchers, tecnology, or anti air defenses to destroy military vehicles all we need is a rifle, because holding a rifle turns you into the perfect mix of Arnold/Stollone/Reb Brown. They will rip tanks apart with their teeth because their hands will of course be duel wielding and mowing down the government lackies.

Other answer

Bows to fire sticks of dynamite

Avatar image for Ace6301
#31 Posted by Ace6301 (21389 posts) -
What with all these helicopters crashing I feel the need to defend my property. I demand the right to own a fully functioning Centurion C-Ram as well as a hand held FIM-92 Stinger anti-air missile launcher. Also death rays. They say they don't exist yet but I know they do and I want one.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
#32 Posted by coolbeans90 (21305 posts) -

Because very few of them actually want to own rocket launchers, presumably.

Avatar image for sonicare
#33 Posted by sonicare (55924 posts) -

Because the guy with the rocket launcher is always the team killer. Always.

Avatar image for TheHighWind
#34 Posted by TheHighWind (5391 posts) -

Haven't you been to the movie theatre and it tells you to turn off all bazookas until after the movie?

Avatar image for deactivated-598fc45371265
#35 Posted by deactivated-598fc45371265 (13247 posts) -

The Taliban are doing a pretty damn good job keeping the US military at bay and they don't have tanks or jets or missile systems.....

Avatar image for VanHelsingBoA64
#36 Posted by VanHelsingBoA64 (5455 posts) -
legalize nukes
Avatar image for lamprey263
#37 Posted by lamprey263 (35030 posts) -
well, if you really believe that the 2nd amendment is to protect yourself from government tyranny you should be lobbying for rocket launchers, I mean the government and their enforcers of oppression have armored vehicles so anti-tyranny freedom fighters are going to need something that packs a punch
Avatar image for VoodooHak
#38 Posted by VoodooHak (15989 posts) -

The Taliban are doing a pretty damn good job keeping the US military at bay and they don't have tanks or jets or missile systems.....

Storm_Marine

And the Afghanis made it real hard for the Soviets... as much as the North Vietnamese made it hard for the US.

Avatar image for thegerg
#39 Posted by thegerg (18398 posts) -
well, if you really believe that the 2nd amendment is to protect yourself from government tyranny you should be lobbying for rocket launchers, I mean the government and their enforcers of oppression have armored vehicles so anti-tyranny freedom fighters are going to need something that packs a punchlamprey263
Who are you to tell others for what they should lobby? Let others lobby for what they wish, it's not up to you, kiddo.
Avatar image for Chickity_China
#40 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -
[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Which question? "And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right?" That's not even a complete thought. Try constructing a real question. "Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets?" Because there are fewer of them available, and there is less of a demand. Making them easier to buy would artificially deflate their price, screwing over their owner. It would also be just plain silly from an economics standpoint. Flooding the market with something for which there is so little demand is pointless. I suggest that you take an introduction to economics course. MrPraline

If there's low demand, the price would be low. You take an econ 101 course. Lol.

Not if there's almost no to no supply.

So the demand is low then. Why is demand so low when it's in the best interest of Americans to arm themselves against a government that has the most advanced military in the world at it's disposal?
Avatar image for Chickity_China
#41 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -
[QUOTE="lamprey263"]well, if you really believe that the 2nd amendment is to protect yourself from government tyranny you should be lobbying for rocket launchers, I mean the government and their enforcers of oppression have armored vehicles so anti-tyranny freedom fighters are going to need something that packs a punchthegerg
Who are you to tell others for what they should lobby? Let others lobby for what they wish, it's not up to you, kiddo.

That's why gun lobbyists are idiots.
Avatar image for thegerg
#42 Posted by thegerg (18398 posts) -
[QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

[QUOTE="thegerg"] Which question? "And the money to pay hundreds of dollars per round and the patience to wait up to half a year just for your order of rockets to come in right?" That's not even a complete thought. Try constructing a real question. "Why not make rockets as easy to buy as bullets?" Because there are fewer of them available, and there is less of a demand. Making them easier to buy would artificially deflate their price, screwing over their owner. It would also be just plain silly from an economics standpoint. Flooding the market with something for which there is so little demand is pointless. I suggest that you take an introduction to economics course. MrPraline

If there's low demand, the price would be low. You take an econ 101 course. Lol.

Not if there's almost no to no supply.

He seems to have a bad habit of posting about things of which he is quite ignorant.
Avatar image for sonicare
#43 Posted by sonicare (55924 posts) -
[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="lamprey263"]well, if you really believe that the 2nd amendment is to protect yourself from government tyranny you should be lobbying for rocket launchers, I mean the government and their enforcers of oppression have armored vehicles so anti-tyranny freedom fighters are going to need something that packs a punchChickity_China
Who are you to tell others for what they should lobby? Let others lobby for what they wish, it's not up to you, kiddo.

That's why gun lobbyists are idiots.

I wouldnt say they are idiots. Far from it - given how powerful their lobby is.
Avatar image for VoodooHak
#44 Posted by VoodooHak (15989 posts) -

[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="Chickity_China"]

If there's low demand, the price would be low. You take an econ 101 course. Lol.

Chickity_China

Not if there's almost no to no supply.

So the demand is low then. Why is demand so low when it's in the best interest of Americans to arm themselves against a government that has the most advanced military in the world at it's disposal?

As has been explained a couple times already, the facilities and resources needed to properly store and dispose of these things is a huge barrier to entry. Firearms and firearm ammo is just more practical.

Then again, I don't complain about the people that are able to own them legally.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
#45 Posted by HoolaHoopMan (9472 posts) -
Arms are interpreted differently by everyone. Obviously hundreds of pounds of C4 is different than a pistol. Think its mainly the problem when it comes to the issue of the second amendment, people have differing opinions on what constitutes a reasonable 'arm' to possess.
Avatar image for Chickity_China
#46 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -
[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="Chickity_China"][QUOTE="thegerg"] Who are you to tell others for what they should lobby? Let others lobby for what they wish, it's not up to you, kiddo.

That's why gun lobbyists are idiots.

I wouldnt say they are idiots. Far from it - given how powerful their lobby is.

Just because there are a lot of them doesn't mean they're not idiots.
Avatar image for Chickity_China
#47 Posted by Chickity_China (2322 posts) -

[QUOTE="Chickity_China"][QUOTE="MrPraline"] Not if there's almost no to no supply.VoodooHak

So the demand is low then. Why is demand so low when it's in the best interest of Americans to arm themselves against a government that has the most advanced military in the world at it's disposal?

As has been explained a couple times already, the facilities and resources needed to properly store and dispose of these things is a huge barrier to entry. Firearms and firearm ammo is just more practical.

Then again, I don't complain about the people that are able to own them legally.

Try destroying a tank or shooting down a fighter jet with an AR15 then we can discuss practical.
Avatar image for ghostwarrior786
#48 Posted by ghostwarrior786 (5811 posts) -

i want my own f16. i am guns pro but not for the insane reasons some people give ie. fight against government

Avatar image for thegerg
#49 Posted by thegerg (18398 posts) -

i want my own f16. i am guns pro but not for the insane reasons some people give ie. fight against government

ghostwarrior786
Haha. I fail to see why person defense is insane, but OK.
Avatar image for Lotus-Edge
#50 Posted by Lotus-Edge (50440 posts) -
where's my personal missile defense system??!?comp_atkins