What is your rankings of the current Presidential canidates?

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="ChampionoChumps"] Ron Paul won't drop out. Hell, he has a chance of winning the nomination. For presidency though, I'm not sure since the race isn't over but if there are no libertarian leaning candidates then I will write Dr. Paul in. Also, I've seen you describe yourself as a conservative libertarian, so why would you vote Romney (who is like the Republican form of Obama but lies even more) over Paul?mingmao3046

Being elected into presidency? Well then I would like to inform you that in the latest PPP poll of who would fare better, Paul v Obama, it was 46% to 48%, respectively. Mitt Romney didn't do much better and was the only candidate who did better than Paul.

Opposition to imperialism is not isolationism! Calling Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your windows and steal your things. Seriously, I disagree with policing the world, but even if I did, I would not support doing it when we are bankrupt.ChampionoChumps

Romney has also come ahead of Obama in some(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html) polls. That, however, doesn't change the fact that libertarianism isn't supported widely by the American public. We are a center-right country, and some of the things Dr. Paul says are frankly unattainable. I respect him for his consistency, but I still believe(and many others do as well) Romney has the best shot at winning the presidency.

I don't advocate imperialism, but that doesn't change the fact that Dr. Paul supports isolationism. Your example doesn't represent what is actually being talked about ITT. It's perfectly fine that you disagree with me about being the world's police, but it's simply something I will not negotiate on. Also, we don't need anymore unemployed veterans. The longer we keep our troops useful, the better off we'll be. I don't agree with cuts to defense when they're paying for hundreds of thousands of people who would otherwise NOT be able to find a job.

1. Obama

2. Paul

3. Romney

4. Gingrich

5. Santorum

Sounds like the clothespin election of '68.

1. Ron Paul

2. Gary Johnson

3. misc. lesser known third parties and independents

4. Romney & Obama

6. Gingrich & Santorum

1. Obama

2) Everyone else

The republican candidates are a laughing stock- totally worthless human beings. Although Romney was a pretty good governor when he was in MA.

ffs Romney needs to win the nomination already so that all the Ron Paul supporters on the Internet go away.chessmaster1989

Steven Colbert>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Romney>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Gingrich>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul.

1. Romney or Obama, have yet to decide
2. Romney or Obama
3. Zombie Reagan
4. Raptor Jesus
5. The Dude
6. Mickey Mouse
7. Ron Paul
8. The rest of the Republican field

chessmaster1989

1. Romney or Obama, have yet to decide
2. Romney or Obama
3. Zombie Reagan
4. Raptor Jesus
5. The Dude
6. Mickey Mouse
7. Ron Paul
8. The rest of the Republican field

chessmaster1989

I think Mitt Romney is my pick. It looks like he's gonna get the nomination.

For the last election it was Rudy Giuliani, but he flew under the radar for some reason. Unfortunately he's not trying again.

I really don't like Ron Paul anymore. I used to respect him. But after he said Osama deserved a trial, he lost my support.

1. Romney
2. Obama
3. Paul
4. Gingrich
5. ....
6. ....
7. ....
8. Santorum

1. Romney
2. Obama
3. Paul
4. Gingrich
5. ....
6. ....
7. ....
8. Santorum

GamerForca

[QUOTE="the9thinning"]

Mine are:

1. Ron Paul

2. Gary Johnson

3. Mitt Romney

4. Barack Obama/Rick Santorum/Newt Gingrich (if it came down to one of these canidates I would stop caring who won)

anyways just curious to seeeveryone elses rankings

needled24-7

Who the fuk is anti-poker :lol:

Who the fuk is anti-poker :lol:

Ilovegames1992

You would be surprised at the amount of anti-gambling legislation.

[QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]

Who the fuk is anti-poker :lol:

coolbeans90

You would be surprised at the amount of anti-gambling legislation.

Ah ok. Still thats mental.