US and Dutch Troops Muster on Syrian Border; False Flag Chemical Attack Planned

US Troops Mass on Turkey's Syrian Border

By UPI

December 07, 2012 "UPI" -- Some 400 U.S. and Dutch NATO troops were massed on Turkey's Syrian border Friday amid fears besieged President Bashar Assad was poised to use chemical weapons.

FULL ARTICLE

And, if President Assad doesn't use chemical weapons, he will be made to appear as if he did anyway.

To crown it all, a "rebel" group has now threatened to use chemical weapons to commit mass murder against Syria's Alawites. In a grim video allegedly released by the rebels, rabbits are gassed to death with what appears to be a nerve gas derived from chemicals provided by the Turkish company "Tekkim". A voice then threatens:

"You saw what happened? This will be your fate, you infidel Alawites, I swear by ALLAH to make you die like these rabbits, one minute only after you inhale the gas."

ARTICLE AND VIDEO (Not for sensitive viewers)

Such are NATO's allies in Syria. :roll:

US Troops Mass on Turkey's Syrian Border

By UPI

December 07, 2012 "UPI" -- Some 400 U.S. and Dutch NATO troops were massed on Turkey's Syrian border Friday amid fears besieged President Bashar Assad was poised to use chemical weapons.

FULL ARTICLE

And, if President Assad doesn't use chemical weapons, he will be made to appear as if he did anyway.

To crown it all, a "rebel" group has now threatened to use chemical weapons to commit mass murder against Syria's Alawites. In a grim video allegedly released by the rebels, rabbits are gassed to death with what appears to be a nerve gas derived from chemicals provided by the Turkish company "Tekkim". A voice then threatens:

"You saw what happened? This will be your fate, you infidel Alawites, I swear by ALLAH to make you die like these rabbits, one minute only after you inhale the gas."

ARTICLE AND VIDEO (Not for sensitive viewers)

Such are NATO's allies in Syria. :roll:

Stesilaus

LMAO @ TC.

.

I feel really dumb right now.

Is Information Clearing House like Publisher's Clearing House?

>400 troops

omg invasion!

>400 troops

omg invasion!

coolbeans90

US Troops Mass on Turkey's Syrian Border

By UPI

December 07, 2012 "UPI" -- Some 400 U.S. and Dutch NATO troops were massed on Turkey's Syrian border Friday amid fears besieged President Bashar Assad was poised to use chemical weapons.

FULL ARTICLE

And, if President Assad doesn't use chemical weapons, he will be made to appear as if he did anyway.

To crown it all, a "rebel" group has now threatened to use chemical weapons to commit mass murder against Syria's Alawites. In a grim video allegedly released by the rebels, rabbits are gassed to death with what appears to be a nerve gas derived from chemicals provided by the Turkish company "Tekkim". A voice then threatens:

"You saw what happened? This will be your fate, you infidel Alawites, I swear by ALLAH to make you die like these rabbits, one minute only after you inhale the gas."

ARTICLE AND VIDEO (Not for sensitive viewers)

Such are NATO's allies in Syria. :roll:

Stesilaus

:roll:

How about posting something from a better source? Reuters or BBC or even the AP.

Some 400 U.S. and Dutch NATO troops were massed Stesilaus

lol, 400 troops.

anybody who thinks this is an invasion is insane, not to mention the source is pretty laughable.

>400 troops

omg invasion!

coolbeans90

There is no way that 400 troops are going to do anything about the chemical attack. I have read that for the US to secure the chemical weapons, it would probably take 60,000.

There is no way that 400 troops are going to do anything about the chemical attack. I have read that for the US to secure the chemical weapons, it would probably take 60,000.

Jacobistheman

I saw 75,000, and nay invasion or attack risks releasing the gas where it's stored, and it's stored it urban areas.

Is Information Clearing House like Publisher's Clearing House?

jimkabrhel

does "400 US and Dutch troops" really mean 398 US troops, Goldmember and MrPraline?

does "400 US and Dutch troops" really mean 398 US troops, Goldmember and MrPraline?

whipassmt

And, if President Assad doesn't use chemical weapons, he will be made to appear as if he did anywayStesilaus

:roll:

How about posting something from a better source? Reuters or BBC or even the AP.

WhiteKnight77

Bashing the source is cheap.

In any case, very little of what appears on Information Clearing House is written specifically for the site: It's a not-for-profit website that posts essays and articles that are primarily from other sources, including well-known journalists from both the left (e.g. Glenn Greenwald) and right (e.g. Pat Buchanan) of the political spectrum.

Here's the same story on Military.com.

TC I highly recommend you stay away from mediasites like InforWars.

The can have negative impact on your ability to judge information impartially, often skewing data, fear mongering and just plain making things up. It's the same as those celebrity tabloids. Media sources like that prey on ignorance.

Al Jazeera or BBC World News are great sources of information for international affairs.

You have your information wrong. They are not massed, nor are they infantry. They are manning strategically placed Patriot missile systems which can only be used for defense.

Looks like the TC has shown his true colors.

You have your information wrong. They are not massed, nor are they infantry. They are manning strategically placed Patriot missile systems which can only be used for defense.

Looks like the TC has shown his true colors.

airshocker

What colors are those?

:?

What colors are those?

:?

Stesilaus

That the only thing you care about is trying to make the US military look bad.

I mean seriously, how stupid can you be to think 400 troops is a sign of "mustering"?

[QUOTE="Stesilaus"]

What colors are those?

:?

airshocker

That the only thing you care about is trying to make the US military look bad.

I mean seriously, how stupid can you be to think 400 troops is a sign of "mustering"?

Well then I guess Military.com must also be trying to make the US military look bad, since the article appears there too.

And Military.com published it under the even more sensationalistic headline "US Troops Mass on Turkey's Syrian Border".

Well then I guess Military.com must also be trying to make the US military look bad, since the article appears there too.

And Military.com published it under the even more sensationalistic headline "US Troops Mass on Turkey's Syrian Border".

Stesilaus

I don't really care what Military.com does. I'm talking to you. Are you seriously trying to say you don't have the mental capabilities to determine, on your own, that 400 NATO troops on a border doesn't equate to an invasion?

Well.....

The soldiers were beefing up Turkey's border and readying Patriot missiles three days after NATO agreed to deploy the MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile system in Turkey. Military

[QUOTE="Stesilaus"]

Well then I guess Military.com must also be trying to make the US military look bad, since the article appears there too.

And Military.com published it under the even more sensationalistic headline "US Troops Mass on Turkey's Syrian Border".

airshocker

I don't really care what Military.com does. I'm talking to you. Are you seriously trying to say you don't have the mental capabilities to determine, on your own, that 400 NATO troops on a border doesn't equate to an invasion?

I didn't say (or even imply) that 400 troops were planning an invasion.

The first mention of "invasion" is by coolbeans90, who was presumably being sardonic.

I didn't say (or even imply) that 400 troops were planning an invasion.

The first mention of "invasion" is by coolbeans90, who was presumably being sardonic.

Stesilaus

You are implying it. By your thread title and what makes up your post.

At the very least you are making much ado about nothing. At worst, you're fear-mongering.

This just in; SAM systems are capable of single-handedly invading another country. More at 11.

does "400 US and Dutch troops" really mean 398 US troops, Goldmember and MrPraline?

whipassmt

Oh this idiot again :roll:

rofl Wish we'd just stay the f*ck out MrPraline

You basically are staying the fvck out. :P You guys get to sit back and watch little blips on a screen as your scary missile launchers do all the work.

http://www.infowars.com/nato-plot-to-use-ambulances-as-cover-for-humanitarian-invasion-of-syria/

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33249.htm

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33248.htm (Not for sensitive viewers)

Stesilaus

[QUOTE="MrPraline"]rofl Wish we'd just stay the f*ck out airshocker

You basically are staying the fvck out. :P You guys get to sit back and watch little blips on a screen as your scary missile launchers do all the work.

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

:roll:

How about posting something from a better source? Reuters or BBC or even the AP.

Stesilaus

Bashing the source is cheap.

In any case, very little of what appears on Information Clearing House is written specifically for the site: It's a not-for-profit website that posts essays and articles that are primarily from other sources, including well-known journalists from both the left (e.g. Glenn Greenwald) and right (e.g. Pat Buchanan) of the political spectrum.

Here's the same story on Military.com.

Was expecting Onion article.

Time to switch to Plan B.

*Pulls out giant sign*

Get your tinfoil hats! Tinfoil hats here! Protects against radiation, mind control, government satelites, alien death rays, and Zionist media!

Comes in adult and child sizes!

Only $45 dollars a hat! Buy two get one free!

Tinfoil hats here!

(or even imply) that 400 troops were planning an invasion.

The first mention of "invasion" is by coolbeans90, who was presumably being sardonic.

Stesilaus

Is English your first language? I mean, read your fvcking topic title, man.

Haha, good but somehow I doubt the price tag is that insignificant. It's the Dutch government. They'll pay 20 for a dollar menu at McDonald's.MrPraline

Well since it's NATO I don't think you're going to be paying anything other than what you normally pay.

Infowars is a kook website. They don't produce anything of any substance and are a bunch of conspiratorial nuts. Don't trust anything they say. They over sensationalize as much as the big biased media outlets.