Spider-Woman barrel of the bottom

Apparently woman are sexualized in comics.

Still, those of twisted perspective insist that her buttocks seem dominantly curvy, bordering on bulgingly provocative. There's also a certain peculiar openness to her posture, as if she's either eaten some pernicious British curry or she's bracing herself for a very strong earthquake.....

http://www.cnet.com/news/spider-woman-cover-scrapes-barrel-of-the-bottom/

That's just a spider people pose. Spider-Man kinda poses like that at times as well, and yes he has a rather firm fanny. Those spider tights leave little to the imagination.

I wonder if she ever gets anything done, having to pull spandex out of her butt crack every 5 seconds...

Man, they must get the crappiest of the crappiest to draw Spider-Woman. Regardless of the pose that cover just looks bad.

All I can think about is that costume looks horrible.

Talk about Horrible Costume. Spider-Woman shouldn't be that sexy.

I agree. Comic book characters should haven't their rights violated in the united states. They should sue our government.

her ass is still smaller than powergirls tits.

Mating call for Spiderman, possibly.

It's a special edition where Spiderman makes a cameo.

Complaints about female sexualization with a focus on one whose superpower is being attractive

...Yeah.

well, no doubt they are, but just sexualizing for appeal is a long shot from objectification of women, comic books tend to give some depth and personality to their characters to make them more than just objects of sexual fantasies

also, even if men look at some women as sexual objects, there's a respect there, while feminists might act like it's men that hate women, it's usually women that are the biggest jelly haters and shit talkers of other women, and that's the stone cold hard fucking truth

@uninspiredcup said:

Apparently woman are sexualized in comics.

Still, those of twisted perspective insist that her buttocks seem dominantly curvy, bordering on bulgingly provocative. There's also a certain peculiar openness to her posture, as if she's either eaten some pernicious British curry or she's bracing herself for a very strong earthquake.....

http://www.cnet.com/news/spider-woman-cover-scrapes-barrel-of-the-bottom/

Nice ass

Nicki Minaj be doing role play

Well, they usually TRY to give some depth and personality to their characters.

In any case, this shit is par for the course for superhero comics. I'm not even gonna try to dignify it, but I'm not gonna villify it either. Historically, this shit has just been porn for young males who were too young to actually buy porn. Too young to get a subscription to Hustler? Then go buy the Spider-Woman comics and wank off to the illustrations of superheroines with their tits and asses practically hanging out. I'm not gonna try to portray this shit as respectful. But as someone who looks at porn, **** it. It's porn for little kids and anime/comic nerds. And...that's fine. Or it's not. But if it's not, then I'm not gonna throw the first stone here.

That seems about normal for comics.

Sex is a motivator, it's biological, and it's a damn strong one. Using it to sell comics exploits the audience just as much as those it portrays. Women are aware of the power of their sexuality and they use it to their benefit. It's behavior deeply embedded in our socially constructed notions of gender roles. To have to contend with more idealized images of sex appeal, that takes power away from women, and that's the power of their sexuality. The level playing field in equality is that people should be treated on the merit of their character, first and foremost. Well, that would be all fine and good if we were rational people, unfortunately when sexual motivation is involved rational goes right out the window. Women claim they want a nice guy in touch with his feelings, then throw themselves in passion at the bad boy. Guys have feelings but expressing them is considered weak, and is responded to as such by both ends of the gender gap. We're dubious, fickle beings, because there's constantly a rational side and irrational side at battle with each other. We're not so shallow that we don't require meaningful sustenance in our connections with others, but the spice and allure of sexuality is going to always have power. We'd be hypocrites to assume otherwise.

Whereas you or I differ on the respect issue, men can appreciate the sexual imagery of women respectfully, whether our reactions be titillating or tantalizing. The vilifying of this by modern feminists is that indulging in such is objectifying, which by their account amounts to a patriarchal belief that we as men are entitled to possess, use, control and dispose of that which we find desirable. I take issue with this on grounds that men don't typically claim entitlement and reciprocation just because they desire it. And that as far as I'm concerned is respect.