@airshocker: you can't accurately answer a thread just by reading the title, it helps if you dig a little deeper if there is a link read/watch it check out the opening post, but you even watched the video and you still get it wrong.
"And I will continue to do so if provoked"
You really think your winning by reacting like you think he wants you to react? Hmmmm
Anyway thinking about it, all Russell did was review Hannitys debate and post his review on you tube, you wierdly was annoyed by this, are you equally annoyed when a games reviewer post a review on you tube should the reviewer go and debate with the developers first, anyone who post an opinion on you tube in your world is a coward or is petty I guess.
But what you're actually telling me is that I SHOULD NOT trust what you say when it comes to thread titles. It's simple: If you want someone to be accurate when talking with you, you can't mislead them. It's, therefore, not their fault when they do make a mistake because YOU made the mistake that confused them. If you had just paraphrased what the video was actually about, that would be a different story. You are actually MISLEADING the readers of this thread with your title.
Winning? What is there to win here, exactly? Is there some coveted trophy I should be concerned with achieving? Your problem is you think there's actually something to win here. That's hilarious.
You need to start proof-reading before you post. It's starting to seem like you're just rolling your face across the keyboard before you respond. That's how little sense you're making. I think responding to each point the way did is pretty childish, yes. It definitely rubs me the wrong way, especially if this guy is trying to be taken seriously.