Not just Episodes VII, VIII and IX - More Spin-Offs Planned for Star Wars

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] If your post was intended to be highly sarcastic then well done. If you were being serious then :lol:Nuck81

Elaborate please.

The Prequel trilogies are the very definition of Forgettable summer movie trash. They are just very mediocre movies. Poor Dialogue, over done fake looking SFX, and poor acting. When Samuel L Jackson looks bored in a part then you know it has problems. If any of the prequels had any other name than Star Wars on them, they would have bombed.

1-3 were a lot better than forgettable trash. We're talking about them right now. And the point of my post was they need to maintain an extremely high production value. How good you think they are wasn't the point.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]Elaborate please.

Pirate700

The Prequel trilogies are the very definition of Forgettable summer movie trash. They are just very mediocre movies. Poor Dialogue, over done fake looking SFX, and poor acting. When Samuel L Jackson looks bored in a part then you know it has problems. If any of the prequels had any other name than Star Wars on them, they would have bombed.

1-3 were a lot better than forgettable trash. We're talking about them right now. And the point of my post was they need to maintain an extremely high production value. How good you think they are wasn't the point.

Ok so....:lol:
Avatar image for Jak-25
Jak-25

2475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Jak-25
Member since 2007 • 2475 Posts

I wonder how they will turn out.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] The Prequel trilogies are the very definition of Forgettable summer movie trash. They are just very mediocre movies. Poor Dialogue, over done fake looking SFX, and poor acting. When Samuel L Jackson looks bored in a part then you know it has problems. If any of the prequels had any other name than Star Wars on them, they would have bombed. Nuck81

1-3 were a lot better than forgettable trash. We're talking about them right now. And the point of my post was they need to maintain an extremely high production value. How good you think they are wasn't the point.

Ok so....:lol:

You don't think 1-3 had high production value? :|

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]1-3 were a lot better than forgettable trash. We're talking about them right now. And the point of my post was they need to maintain an extremely high production value. How good you think they are wasn't the point.

Pirate700

Ok so....:lol:

You don't think 1-3 had high production value? :|

Spending a lot of money on the making of a movie doesn't mean d!ck. High Production value does not equal success. The only decent movie out of the prequel Trilogy was ROTS, and that just managed to be mediocre. The other two are on par with Battleship (Which also had High Production Value) and if they hadn't had the name Star Wars, would have made Battleship money.
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] Ok so....:lol:Nuck81

You don't think 1-3 had high production value? :|

Spending a lot of money on the making of a movie doesn't mean d!ck. High Production value does not equal success. The only decent movie out of the prequel Trilogy was ROTS, and that just managed to be mediocre. The other two are on par with Battleship (Which also had High Production Value) and if they hadn't had the name Star Wars, would have made Battleship money.

What are you going on about? I just said I hope they have high production value. Unbunch those panties.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]You don't think 1-3 had high production value? :|

Pirate700

Spending a lot of money on the making of a movie doesn't mean d!ck. High Production value does not equal success. The only decent movie out of the prequel Trilogy was ROTS, and that just managed to be mediocre. The other two are on par with Battleship (Which also had High Production Value) and if they hadn't had the name Star Wars, would have made Battleship money.

What are you going on about? I just said I hope they have high production value. Unbunch those panties.

And I said High Production Value is meaningless if it produces a sh!t movie
Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] Spending a lot of money on the making of a movie doesn't mean d!ck. High Production value does not equal success. The only decent movie out of the prequel Trilogy was ROTS, and that just managed to be mediocre. The other two are on par with Battleship (Which also had High Production Value) and if they hadn't had the name Star Wars, would have made Battleship money.Nuck81

What are you going on about? I just said I hope they have high production value. Unbunch those panties.

And I said High Production Value is meaningless if it produces a sh!t movie

Ok?

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

All terrible ideas except for the Boba Fett movie. Give that to Joe Johnston, he's the one who made the character iconic after all.

If they make the Han Solo movie, please get Idris Elba or Fassbender to play him.

Avatar image for Meinhard1
Meinhard1

6790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Meinhard1
Member since 2010 • 6790 Posts
I'm stoked.
Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts
Speaking of KOTOR....it might be interesting seeing it from the perspective of Malak. Or it might not.