[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="CommandoAgent"] There is more evidence then those 4 pages. What evidence is there that the rebels did it?[/QUOTE Where is the evidence that the Syrian Arab Army did Person0 did it? on YouTube? BM Blog? really? i am not stupid. "What evidence is there that the rebels did it?" Since the British FS William Hague didn't have any evidence to show the British MPs any actual evidence what evidence do you? Phone calls intercepted nonsense in which i dont buy?CommandoAgent
Lol whats wrong with BM's blog? We now the rockets used to deliver the chemicals have only been seen used by the govt forces.
We know the rockets came from the direction of several govt bases.
We know the rockets hit rebel controlled areas
We know that an assault by govt forces followed up the chemical attacks
We knew 3 days before it happened the govt was preparing for a chemical attack
We know the govt has large stock piles of chemical weapons (while the rebels don't)
We know the govt delayed UN inspectors by shelling the area with conventional weapons.
Seems pretty strong evidence to me. And this is the non- classified things
Now abouut that evidence of it being the rebels...
1. The Reaction by brown moses after being Challenged and questioned. "Conspiracy theorists, I know I've got you very excited, but tweet your boring theories to me and I'll block you, not interested at all" Just like John Kerry We Know, We know which has being stated 30 times by Kerry. "We know the govt delayed UN inspectors by shelling the area with conventional weapons." It wasn't the Syrian govt it was the UN itself here's the link for it with sources. http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/08/23/un_blocking_its_own_chemical_weapons_investigation_into_syria U.N. Slowing Its Own Chemical Weapons Investigation In Syria " It's an active war zone in Damascus," said Kennedy, who has gained extensive experience managing U.N. humanitarian operations in the world's deadliest trouble spots over the past 20 years. "I was there a few months ago: you hear every day impacts, shells, there might be 10 in a day, you might hear 80 in a day. You can see airstrikes, you can see artillery. You get shot at, I was only there for 3 and ½ days as a visitor and my car was shot, we were shot at twice," including once by an unidentified sniper. " "We know the govt has large stock piles of chemical weapons (while the rebels don't)" Oh really just like the same Intel we had on Iraq? "We know the rockets came from the direction of several govt bases." You must be following the rebel sources on twitter as well BM arent you? let me guess base 155th? where is the proof Person0? "We know that an assault by govt forces followed up the chemical attacks" Where is the proof that it was an chemical attack? YouTube videos or the wisdom of William Hague? "Seems pretty strong evidence to me. And this is the non- classified things" LOL and all this from where? CNN? Twitter rebel sources? you know there is a large majority of people world wide whom dont buy you right? "Now abouut that evidence of it being the rebels" Now are you aware your beloved rebels have being making tunnels in Damascus?Still waiting on any type of evidence that it was the rebels... Thats why BM blocked people, doing all kinds of claims but nothing to back them up.
And the syrian govt was shelling the areas, which did delay the inspectors along with snipers.
Pulling out Iraq is funny since they aren't similar but whatever makes you feel better.
You keep asking for proof but you dont show any to counter mine. The rockets are launched from Iranian vehicles, Iran supplies the govt, the govt is the only one seen with those rockets and the launchers.
Its proved to be a chemical attac by the 1300 dead people without any visible injuries and all showing signs of chemical weapons.
This information is from various news sources, videos from people there and analysts..
And what tunnels matter how in this chemical attack?
Log in to comment