Is Gaspar Noe's LOVE a porn movie or a drama movie?

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

After watching Gaspar Noe's LOVE (2015) recently i've come to conclusion its a glorified porn movie under disguise of art/drama movie lol.

What you say OT? :)

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

This is easy to answer. If you watched the entire thing it's not a porn.

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

@Riverwolf007 said:

This is easy to answer. If you watched the entire thing it's not a porn.

So you are saying its a drama movie with overexplicit sex scenes every 5 minutes? Saw it full, still can't imagne it as a drama movie lol. It even surpasses Erotica in movies if you understand what i mean lol.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Why not both?

Avatar image for drunk_pi
Drunk_PI

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Drunk_PI
Member since 2014 • 3008 Posts

Is penetration shown? Because if it is, then it's a glorified porno with a plot.

If not, then imo, it's one of those edgy softcore movies.

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

@drunk_pi said:

Is penetration shown? Because if it is, then it's a glorified porno with a plot.

If not, then imo, it's one of those edgy softcore movies.

Yep, shown :(

Avatar image for drunk_pi
Drunk_PI

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Drunk_PI
Member since 2014 • 3008 Posts

@indzman said:
@drunk_pi said:

Is penetration shown? Because if it is, then it's a glorified porno with a plot.

If not, then imo, it's one of those edgy softcore movies.

Yep, shown :(

....

Is it at least fap-worthy?

Avatar image for indzman
indzman

27736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 indzman
Member since 2006 • 27736 Posts

@drunk_pi said:
@indzman said:
@drunk_pi said:

Is penetration shown? Because if it is, then it's a glorified porno with a plot.

If not, then imo, it's one of those edgy softcore movies.

Yep, shown :(

....

Is it at least fap-worthy?

Tottally.

Avatar image for sammyjenkis898
sammyjenkis898

28392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 sammyjenkis898
Member since 2007 • 28392 Posts

Pretty sure it's garbage.

Avatar image for VaguelyTagged
VaguelyTagged

10701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 VaguelyTagged
Member since 2009 • 10701 Posts

i prefer porn with a plot to any drama movie out there so i hope it is indeed porn.

Avatar image for catalli
Catalli

3451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#11 Catalli  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 3451 Posts

@Riverwolf007 said:

This is easy to answer. If you watched the entire thing it's not a porn.

loooool

anyways, yeah, keep the discussion classy dudes XD

Avatar image for with_teeth26
with_teeth26

9882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 1

#12 with_teeth26  Online
Member since 2007 • 9882 Posts

I still think the best/funniest examples of a 'is it a porno?" film is Caligula, since it has some really well respected actors (Peter O'Toole and Helen Mirren amongst others).

also lots of explicit sex. Its really funny to watch with friends

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98346 Posts

@drunk_pi said:

Is penetration shown? Because if it is, then it's a glorified porno with a plot.

If not, then imo, it's one of those edgy softcore movies.

Softcore porn doesn't show penetration.

The true definition of pornography is the act of sexual intercourse is ACTUALLY taking place (whether shown or not). If this film does not have any real sex in it, then it's not porn.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

Porn

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@foxhound_fox said:
@drunk_pi said:

Is penetration shown? Because if it is, then it's a glorified porno with a plot.

If not, then imo, it's one of those edgy softcore movies.

Softcore porn doesn't show penetration.

The true definition of pornography is the act of sexual intercourse is ACTUALLY taking place (whether shown or not). If this film does not have any real sex in it, then it's not porn.

I disagree. I mean, "food porn" is a thing, and it's not like bacon is sticking its dick into the hot dogs. Movies like Saw and Hostel get labelled as "torture porn" even though no one is actually having sex.

The point is that "porn" is generally just appealing to base desires, like "me hungry, me need to eat" or "me angry, me need to kill" or "me horny, me need to ****." It's just wank material. Now, that's not to say that being wank-worthy automatically makes something porn. After all, I've certainly gotten physical with myself after watching Monster's Ball or Mulholland Dr. But with porn, being wankworthy is sort of the primary point of the thing. Like, sure you can wank to Mulholland Dr, but that's CLEARLY not the primary point of the movie. There's actually a lot of interesting intellectual and aesthetic stuff in there. It kind of sucks as a porno, because only 3 minutes out of the entire running time are actually something you could wank to. The entire rest of the movie, you're clearly supposed to be THINKING. And by contrast, lots of B movies are clearly (soft core) porn even though no one actually has sex. Sure, no one has sex, but the art direction and the cinematography and the writing are so shitty that it's clear that the whole point was just to give an excuse to get women naked so that viewers could beat off to that.

Avatar image for PernicioEnigma
PernicioEnigma

6243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 PernicioEnigma
Member since 2010 • 6243 Posts

@drunk_pi said:

Is penetration shown? Because if it is, then it's a glorified porno with a plot.

If not, then imo, it's one of those edgy softcore movies.

Antichrist showed penetration, and I'm sure most consider it a movie, not a porno.