This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#1 Posted by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

What are your thoughts on the relation between heredity and IQ, as well as that between race and IQ?

Avatar image for XaosII
#2 Posted by XaosII (16705 posts) -

There is no single factor that correlates to a higher IQ. There have been studies done about identical twins raised in the same household vs identical twins raised in different households and their effects on their IQ. There are studies showing that children who have been breastfed have slightly higher IQ's. Why? Who knows.

Every study about parent's IQ's and race are definitely a contributing factor. But by no means are they the only one, and they are likely not even the most important indicators.

Avatar image for dave123321
#3 Edited by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

Probs environment stuff

Avatar image for perfect_blue
#4 Posted by Perfect_Blue (29844 posts) -

If there exists a link then it's meaningless anyway. IQ is about as useless a system to measure smarts as BMI is to fitness.

Avatar image for dave123321
#5 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

Hey, Emil

Say you have 45 coins on a table in front of you and you are blindfolded. You are told that 17 of them are facing heads up.

You are then instructed to separate the coins into two groups that each contain the same number of tails up coins. You cannot feel the faces but you can flip any and all coins. How do you achieve separating the coins into two groups that contain the same number of tails in each?

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#6 Posted by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

I believe that genes determine a person's highest potential IQ and that environment and upbringing determines their actual IQ, and that subsequently the current differences in the IQ make-up of each race is genetic. In my opinion, tropical environments are the least challenging to survive in and subsequently groups that evolved in such environments have the lowest IQs on average. On the other hand, cold environments require higher IQs (e.g. better group coordination, better spatial/ geometric perception [more difficult to see in snow], more creativity to create clothes, etc).

Avatar image for dave123321
#7 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

Guys remember that snow snowing section in the last of us

Visibility Limited

Ha ha

Avatar image for dave123321
#8 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

I do want you to engage that coin puzzle, Emil by the way

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#9 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

@dave123321 said:

Hey, Emil

Say you have 45 coins on a table in front of you and you are blindfolded. You are told that 17 of them are facing heads up.

You are then instructed to separate the coins into two groups that each contain the same number of tails up coins. You cannot feel the faces but you can flip any and all coins. How do you achieve separating the coins into two groups that contain the same number of tails in each?

  • 17 are heads up
  • 28 are tails up
  • ...I don't know. This seems like a trick question.
Avatar image for dave123321
#10 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

No tricks.

There is a way to put the coins into two separate physical groups that each contain an equal number of tails up coins without feeling the faces. And you can flip over whatever amount of coins you want

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#11 Posted by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

@dave123321 said:

No tricks.

There is a way to put the coins into two separate physical groups that each contain an equal number of tails up coins without feeling the faces. And you can flip over whatever amount of coins you want

Sorry. Can't figure it out.

Avatar image for dave123321
#12 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

Oh ok. Perhaps this can be open for others to puzzle over

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
#13 Edited by chessmaster1989 (30204 posts) -
@dave123321 said:

Hey, Emil

Say you have 45 coins on a table in front of you and you are blindfolded. You are told that 17 of them are facing heads up.

You are then instructed to separate the coins into two groups that each contain the same number of tails up coins. You cannot feel the faces but you can flip any and all coins. How do you achieve separating the coins into two groups that contain the same number of tails in each?

Make a pile of 17 and flip that pile?

(Reasoning: if a coin in the pile of 17 is heads, then it has a corresponding tails in the pile of 28. When the heads is flipped, it matches the tails. On the other hand, if a coin in the pile of 17 is tails (and so is not in the pile of 28), it flips and becomes a heads)

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#14 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

@dave123321 said:

Oh ok. Perhaps this can be open for others to puzzle over

I don't see how it can be solved. For example, let's say that I decide to split the coins into a group of 25 coins and another of 20 coins. In this case, I would not know how many coins of each group are heads up and how many are tails up. Also, flipping over coins wouldn't help me at all, because I can't see what coins I'm flipping over and subsequently still won't know the amount of coins that are heads up and the amount that are tails up. I'm convinced that this is a trick question.

Avatar image for dave123321
#15 Edited by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

@chess

I think you flip the over the other pile instead but yes

Avatar image for deeliman
#16 Posted by deeliman (3728 posts) -

@dave123321

You make 1 group of 17, and one of 28. If I assume all coins in the group of 17 are tails, that would mean there are 0 tails up coins in the group of 28, so if I flip all 17 coins I get the same number. If I assume 16 of them are tails, there is one heads up in the group of 17 and 1 tails up in the group of 28, meaning that if I flip all 17 coins again there would be the same number of coins tails up in each group. I can do this all the way to 0, meaning that it doesn't matter how many are tails up in the group of 17, if I flip them all there will always be the same amount of tails in each group

Avatar image for perfect_blue
#17 Posted by Perfect_Blue (29844 posts) -

@dave123321 said:

Hey, Emil

Say you have 45 coins on a table in front of you and you are blindfolded. You are told that 17 of them are facing heads up.

You are then instructed to separate the coins into two groups that each contain the same number of tails up coins. You cannot feel the faces but you can flip any and all coins. How do you achieve separating the coins into two groups that contain the same number of tails in each?

Flip them all.

Avatar image for deeliman
#18 Edited by deeliman (3728 posts) -

@emil_fontz It's not a trick question, seeming as chessmaster and I have already solved it.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
#19 Edited by chessmaster1989 (30204 posts) -
@dave123321 said:

@chess

I think you flip the over the other pile instead but yes

If you flip the 28 then you could end up with (e.g.) 28 tails in one pile and 28 in the other. So you flip over the 17.

Technically this works with any number of tails <=22 in the pile (e.g. if you have 10 tails, then you make a pile of 10 and flip that). Actually upon reflection I think it works with any number of tails period.

Avatar image for dave123321
#20 Edited by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

The solution is pretty much right but I think you guys might have gotten mixed up on there being 17 heads and not 17 tails

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
#21 Posted by chessmaster1989 (30204 posts) -

Oh yeah I read it as 17 are tails. Oops

Avatar image for dave123321
#22 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

Yeah the solution works if you change any of the numbers involved.

Avatar image for deeliman
#23 Posted by deeliman (3728 posts) -

Yeah I read it wrong as well

Avatar image for deeliman
#24 Posted by deeliman (3728 posts) -

@dave123321 I'm bored, give me another puzzle

Avatar image for dave123321
#25 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

Ah, ok

Avatar image for dave123321
#26 Posted by dave123321 (35329 posts) -

@deeliman: have a limited window of time before my phone loses power and can't think of a good one at the top of my head , so won't be able to post one

Sorry

Avatar image for deeliman
#27 Posted by deeliman (3728 posts) -

:(

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#28 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

After creating a series of charts to represent two random groupings, I realized that the problem is indeed solvable.

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#29 Posted by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

Hey, guys. Take this IQ test just for fun.

Avatar image for gamerguru100
#30 Posted by gamerguru100 (12686 posts) -

I took some evaluation thing back in junior high school (I remember I was turning either 15 or 16 at the time, and I think it had something to do with special ed) and my IQ ended up being 97. Apparently I had also taken an evaluation in fourth grade and my IQ was a "whopping" 88. Not even a 10 point increase, and I was told that by late adolescence (18 years of age), your IQ stays at whatever it is. I know the average IQ is 100, and that 97 is within the average range of 90-110, but I don't feel like my IQ is even 97. Considering the fact that I'm really derpy a lot and suck at most things science or math related, my IQ is probably in the 80s. Hell, I remember my mom telling me that I was stunted after I had a derpy moment in 2012, which is still recent to me. I believe her. O_O

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#31 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

Never mind.

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#32 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

Do you have anymore questions like this?

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
#33 Posted by Gaming-Planet (18555 posts) -

I assume those people who score lower IQs live in poor areas.

Avatar image for deeliman
#34 Posted by deeliman (3728 posts) -

@emil_fontz You have to flip the group of 17, not the group of 28. this way it always works with every combination.

Avatar image for deeliman
#35 Posted by deeliman (3728 posts) -

Anyways, according to the IQ test you linked, I have an IQ of 175... which is total bull.

Avatar image for lamprey263
#36 Posted by lamprey263 (34383 posts) -

There could be some genetic factors to intelligence, and some of those factors might be smaller or even significant, but I tend to think greater factors might be those in child rearing, so that isn't exactly genetically hereditary except kids are typically reared by their genetic birth parents. How parents interact and teach their children and the stimulation of their environments are going to have an effect on the child's brain as they grow and their brain, their minds, their personality develops. Also, in utero development of the child's brain is probably going to depend on how the pregnancy is carried out. Studies have shown that a mother's stress levels can overdevelop and underdevelop certain areas of the child's brain, for instance making them more prone to stress and anxiety, and typically these people tend to not think abstractly and behave aggressively, and less prone to empathy whereas babies in the womb whose mother typically remains stress free will have parts of their brain develop that support greater abstract thinking and creativity and display greater empathy. Now, that's not necessarily genetically inherent, for instance the effect could possibly be achieved through a surrogate and therefor not genetically hereditary. People are the products of their environment to a great degree.

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#37 Posted by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

@deeliman:

1. No. If you have a group that consists of 17 heads and another of 28 tales, flipping the former would result in a group of 17 tales and another of 28 tales, in which case neither group would have a number of tales equal to the other.

2. Assuming that you were responding to the post in which I claimed that flipping over every coin in the group that contains 28 coins does not solve every combination, I was incorrect, because doing so does indeed solve every combination.

In a combination that consists of one group of 17 heads and another of 28 tales, if you flipped over every coin in the latter group, you'd end up with a group of 17 heads and a group of 28 heads, that is to say 0 tales and 0 tales, which are equal.

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#38 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

@deeliman said:

Anyways, according to the IQ test you linked, I have an IQ of 175... which is total bull.

You have to consider your score relative to others in order to determine its meaning. I earned only a 127; you're smarter than me.

EDIT:

175 is the highest score one can earn on that IQ test, which implies that you answered every question correctly. I have to ask, what is your ethnicity?

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
#39 Edited by SolidSnake35 (58756 posts) -

That puzzle is witchcraft. Burn them.

Avatar image for lostrib
#40 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@emil_fontz said:

I believe that genes determine a person's highest potential IQ and that environment and upbringing determines their actual IQ, and that subsequently the current differences in the IQ make-up of each race is genetic. In my opinion, tropical environments are the least challenging to survive in and subsequently groups that evolved in such environments have the lowest IQs on average. On the other hand, cold environments require higher IQs (e.g. better group coordination, better spatial/ geometric perception [more difficult to see in snow], more creativity to create clothes, etc).

What's your field of study?

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#41 Posted by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

@lostrib:

Are you asking this to determine whether I'm qualified to draw conclusions about the correlation between race and IQ? I admit that I'm just a layman.

Avatar image for lostrib
#42 Edited by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@emil_fontz said:

@lostrib:

Are you asking this to determine whether I'm qualified to draw conclusions about the correlation between race and IQ? I admit that I'm just a layman.

So you have no basis for any of your conclusions?

Avatar image for BossPerson
#43 Posted by BossPerson (9177 posts) -

@Aljosa23 said:

If there exists a link then it's meaningless anyway. IQ is about as useless a system to measure smarts as BMI is to fitness.

you can't seriously believe in that physical smarts, social smarts, etc crap...

is it a coincidence physicists and mathematicians all have super high iqs?

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
#44 Posted by br0kenrabbit (15070 posts) -

Some of the smartest people I know have dumb-as-shit parents, and vice versa. I don't buy the hereditary bit.

Avatar image for SUD123456
#45 Posted by SUD123456 (4878 posts) -

@emil_fontz said:

What are your thoughts on the relation between heredity and IQ, as well as that between race and IQ?

Based on your posting history, I think the combined IQ of your parents is likely between 120 and 140

Avatar image for lostrib
#46 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@SUD123456 said:

@emil_fontz said:

What are your thoughts on the relation between heredity and IQ, as well as that between race and IQ?

Based on your posting history, I think the combined IQ of your parents is likely between 120 and 140

you might need to dumb down that insult for him

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#47 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@SUD123456 said:

@emil_fontz said:

What are your thoughts on the relation between heredity and IQ, as well as that between race and IQ?

Based on your posting history, I think the combined IQ of your parents is likely between 120 and 140

you might need to dumb down that insult for him

Yet another example of a thread of mine devolving into a series of personal attacks at me instead of remaining an impersonal, objective discussion. It's time for me to abandon this thread. Enjoy the roast, boys. Peace out.

Avatar image for lostrib
#48 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@emil_fontz: you expect people to have actual discussions in your thread when at the first sign of trouble you bail?

Avatar image for emil_fontz
#49 Edited by Emil_Fontz (799 posts) -

What do you guys think of this video?

Loading Video...
Loading Video...