George Zimmerman Arrested. . .Again. . .

  • 73 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
#51 Posted by LostProphetFLCL (18526 posts) -

Like I have been saying since the Treyvon case, the man is a sack of shit who has no business owning a fucking weapon, yet he keeps slipping through the damn system. Really one of the luckiest S.O.B's out there....

Avatar image for branketra
#52 Posted by BranKetra (51726 posts) -

This guy reminds me of O.J. Simpson.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
#53 Posted by MrGeezer (58948 posts) -

@Shottayouth13- said:

But come on, a guy with such a violent history could have never provoked the confrontation with Trayvon Martin that left the youth dead.

Nope. Never.

It's not that he didn't provoke the confrontation, it's that that hasn't been sufficiently proven. Absent proof, the jury was right to acquit him.

Avatar image for m0zart
#54 Edited by m0zart (11568 posts) -

He seems determined to go to jail. There's probably an easier way. He should just go up to a cop and ask to buy some drugs or something.

Avatar image for DrKillByDeath84
#55 Posted by DrKillByDeath84 (357 posts) -

@Jankarcop said:

@DrKillByDeath84 said:

Who the fvck cares.....again.

the family of the innocent black kid he killed.

obviously something is wrong with zimmerman who keeps committing crimes vs. Trayvon who never commited a crime.

You're right man.

Avatar image for Capitan_Kid
#56 Posted by Capitan_Kid (6700 posts) -

They need to lock this fucker up and throw away the key

Avatar image for lostrib
#57 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@Capitan_Kid said:

They need to lock this fucker up and throw away the key

why?

Avatar image for Jimn_tonic
#58 Edited by Jimn_tonic (913 posts) -

@Capitan_Kid said:

They need to lock this fucker up and throw away the key

i'd be content with him having a firearm restriction. the man is harmless without a gun.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
#59 Edited by GreySeal9 (28247 posts) -

Seems pretty obvious that Zimmerman has a bit of a screw loose.

Avatar image for Serraph105
#60 Posted by Serraph105 (31214 posts) -

He's the proverbial good guy with a gun that the NRA guy was talking about.

Avatar image for Serraph105
#61 Posted by Serraph105 (31214 posts) -

@GreySeal9 said:

Seems pretty obvious that Zimmerman has a bit of screw loose.

crazy people have just as much right to a gun as you or I dude.

Avatar image for airshocker
#62 Edited by airshocker (31700 posts) -

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.

Avatar image for Serraph105
#63 Posted by Serraph105 (31214 posts) -
@airshocker said:

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.


As jimn_tonic pointed out he would be harmless without a gun. In my opinion this means he needs a gun far more than you or I require one.

Avatar image for LostProphetFLCL
#64 Edited by LostProphetFLCL (18526 posts) -

@Serraph105 said:
@airshocker said:

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.

As jimn_tonic pointed out he would be harmless without a gun. In my opinion this means he needs a gun far more than you or I require one.

No one who has a history of assaulting police and REPEATED domestic violence incidents involving firearms needs to be owning a gun...

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
#65 Posted by Braun_Roid_Rage (790 posts) -

@Serraph105 said:
@airshocker said:

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.

As jimn_tonic pointed out he would be harmless without a gun. In my opinion this means he needs a gun far more than you or I require one.

Agreed. He would be a sitting duck without them.

Avatar image for Ace6301
#66 Posted by Ace6301 (21389 posts) -

Someone like him doesn't have any business owning a gun.

Avatar image for airshocker
#67 Posted by airshocker (31700 posts) -

@Serraph105 said:
@airshocker said:

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.

As jimn_tonic pointed out he would be harmless without a gun. In my opinion this means he needs a gun far more than you or I require one.

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

Avatar image for jimkabrhel
#68 Posted by jimkabrhel (15623 posts) -

I don't think Zimmerman would be harmless without a gun. If he really does have a violent streak, he'll cause damage in other way. He allegedly choked his girlfriend, no gun there.

Avatar image for leviathan91
#69 Posted by leviathan91 (7763 posts) -

@airshocker said:

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.

It's domestic violence. If convicted, he'll lose his right to bear arms for life even if it is a misdemeanor.

Avatar image for leviathan91
#70 Posted by leviathan91 (7763 posts) -

@dave123321 said:

No no no innocent till proven guilty

What are you a liberal commie? In 'murica, it's guilty until proven guilty.

Avatar image for Nuck81
#71 Posted by Nuck81 (6631 posts) -

@leviathan91 said:

@airshocker said:

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.

It's domestic violence. If convicted, he'll lose his right to bear arms for life even if it is a misdemeanor.

He's already lost his guns.

NRA hero loses guns

Avatar image for airshocker
#72 Posted by airshocker (31700 posts) -

@leviathan91 said:

@airshocker said:

Well it's quite apparent that this schmuck doesn't deserve the right two own firearms. The judge should do something about that.

It's domestic violence. If convicted, he'll lose his right to bear arms for life even if it is a misdemeanor.

That doesn't change the fact that the judge can do something about it right now. He can order the police to confiscate all of his weapons, etc. That, in my opinion, needs to happen ASAP.

Avatar image for leviathan91
#73 Posted by leviathan91 (7763 posts) -

@airshocker:

If charged, he loses his gun. If found innocent he gets his guns back. If found guilty he loses it for life and the right to bear arms.

It's federal law thanks to the lautenburg amendment which restricts those convicted with a dv misdemeanor.

Of course there are plea deals so it depends how the state defines the conviction. I'm surprised you don't know the Lautenberg amendment. Then again is it stereotypical to think cops know all the laws?

Avatar image for airshocker
#74 Posted by airshocker (31700 posts) -

@leviathan91 said:

@airshocker:

If charged, he loses his gun. If found innocent he gets his guns back. If found guilty he loses it for life and the right to bear arms.

It's federal law thanks to the lautenburg amendment which restricts those convicted with a dv misdemeanor.

Of course there are plea deals so it depends how the state defines the conviction. I'm surprised you don't know the Lautenberg amendment. Then again is it stereotypical to think cops know all the laws?

You're missing the point. I know what the Lautenberg amendment is and it doesn't change the fact that Zimmerman needs to be disarmed immediately. Not until he goes through the trial process. Many judges have ordered police to seize the weapons of somebody who has shown themselves to be irresponsible around firearms.