Feds to recognize same sex marriages in all states

Yeah but what about states' rights? States should be able to discriminate all they want because states' rights and something something freedom.

In regard to the right to adopt children, I don't think homosexuals should have that right. Children can be produced by only heterosexual relationships, so why should homosexuals have the right to adopt them when their type of relationship makes it impossible to produce them? Before any of you analogize homosexuals adopting children to infertile heterosexuals adopting children, keep in mind that aside from infertility, an infertile heterosexual couple is otherwise the type of couple that could produce a child.

I know that some, or perhaps most, of you will disagree with what I've said here, but this is my honest opinion.

However, as a believer in science and subsequently evolution, I think homosexuality is abnormal and is counterproductive to the purpose of every species, which is to propagate itself (i.e. reproduce).

I'm an agnostic atheist, so I don't believe in objective morality. Hence, I won't say that homosexuality is objectively wrong. Furthermore, I I believe that people should be allowed to do whatever they want so as long they aren't harming anyone or forcing others to do so. Hence, I think homosexuals should be able to live freely and have the right to marry. However, as a believer in science and subsequently evolution, I think homosexuality is abnormal and is counterproductive to the purpose of every species, which is to propagate itself (i.e. reproduce).

In regard to the right to adopt children, I don't think homosexuals should have that right. Children can be produced by only heterosexual relationships, so why should homosexuals have the right to adopt them when their type of relationship makes it impossible to produce them? Before any of you analogize homosexuals adopting children to infertile heterosexuals adopting children, keep in mind that aside from infertility, an infertile heterosexual couple is otherwise the type of couple that could produce a child.

I know that some, or perhaps most, of you will disagree with what I've said here, but this is my honest opinion.

@br0kenrabbit

I knew that someone would analogize homosexuals adopting children or homosexuality in general to the practice of animals. The presence of such behavior in animals makes it no less abnormal. Lions commit infanticide; would you argue that it's okay for Humans to do the same? Dogs eat their own feces; would you argue that it's not disgusting for Humans to do the same?

@br0kenrabbit

I knew that someone would analogize homosexuals adopting children or homosexuality in general to the practice of animals. The presence of such behavior in animals makes it no less abnormal. Lions commit infanticide; would you argue that it's okay for Humans to do the same? Dogs eat their own feces; would you argue that it's not disgusting for Humans to do the same?

I wonder why OT is so liberal.

I'm an agnostic atheist, so I don't believe in objective morality. Hence, I won't say that homosexuality is objectively wrong. Furthermore, I I believe that people should be allowed to do whatever they want so as long they aren't harming anyone or forcing others to do so. Hence, I think homosexuals should be able to live freely and have the right to marry. However, as a believer in science and subsequently evolution, I think homosexuality is abnormal and is counterproductive to the purpose of every species, which is to propagate itself (i.e. reproduce).

In regard to the right to adopt children, I don't think homosexuals should have that right. Children can be produced by only heterosexual relationships, so why should homosexuals have the right to adopt them when their type of relationship makes it impossible to produce them? Before any of you analogize homosexuals adopting children to infertile heterosexuals adopting children, keep in mind that aside from infertility, an infertile heterosexual couple is otherwise the type of couple that could produce a child.

I know that some, or perhaps most, of you will disagree with what I've said here, but this is my honest opinion.

Regarding the children adoption I agree but only on the principal that it can affect the child negatively by having two parents of the same sex. Children at the very young age are very sensitive psychologically. Anything not common can have a bad influence on them.

Did BluRay really just argue that same-sex marriage can't be compared to marriage between infertile people when it comes to babymaking because infertile couples wouldn't be infertile if you ignored the fact that they are infertile? O.o

I wonder why OT is so liberal.

Numerous studies have been done on this and there is no evidence to suggest that is true.

Did BluRay really just argue that same-sex marriage can't be compared to marriage between infertile people when it comes to babymaking because infertile couples wouldn't be infertile if you ignored the fact that they are infertile? O.o

I'm not sure how I feel about this. I'm scared this might turn me gay any minute now.

I'm an agnostic atheist, so I don't believe in objective morality. Hence, I won't say that homosexuality is objectively wrong. Furthermore, I I believe that people should be allowed to do whatever they want so as long they aren't harming anyone or forcing others to do so. Hence, I think homosexuals should be able to live freely and have the right to marry. However, as a believer in science and subsequently evolution, I think homosexuality is abnormal and is counterproductive to the purpose of every species, which is to propagate itself (i.e. reproduce).

In regard to the right to adopt children, I don't think homosexuals should have that right. Children can be produced by only heterosexual relationships, so why should homosexuals have the right to adopt them when their type of relationship makes it impossible to produce them? Before any of you analogize homosexuals adopting children to infertile heterosexuals adopting children, keep in mind that aside from infertility, an infertile heterosexual couple is otherwise the type of couple that could produce a child.

I know that some, or perhaps most, of you will disagree with what I've said here, but this is my honest opinion.

I wonder why OT is so liberal.

I'm an agnostic atheist, so I don't believe in objective morality. Hence, I won't say that homosexuality is objectively wrong. Furthermore, I I believe that people should be allowed to do whatever they want so as long they aren't harming anyone or forcing others to do so. Hence, I think homosexuals should be able to live freely and have the right to marry. However, as a believer in science and subsequently evolution, I think homosexuality is abnormal and is counterproductive to the purpose of every species, which is to propagate itself (i.e. reproduce).

In regard to the right to adopt children, I don't think homosexuals should have that right. Children can be produced by only heterosexual relationships, so why should homosexuals have the right to adopt them when their type of relationship makes it impossible to produce them? Before any of you analogize homosexuals adopting children to infertile heterosexuals adopting children, keep in mind that aside from infertility, an infertile heterosexual couple is otherwise the type of couple that could produce a child.

I know that some, or perhaps most, of you will disagree with what I've said here, but this is my honest opinion.

you're so full of shit your ass is jealous

However, as a believer in science and subsequently evolution, I think homosexuality is abnormal and is counterproductive to the purpose of every species, which is to propagate itself (i.e. reproduce).