Boston Dynamics' New Robot Is a Giant Segway Bird that could further automate warehouses.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36039 Posts

https://gizmodo.com/boston-dynamics-new-robot-is-a-giant-segway-bird-that-l-1833666944

Saw this on gizmodo and I thought I would post it here. There's more and more forms of automation in the world and I have a combination of fascination and horror with it. So what do you guys think of this thing? In theory it could help reduce the body strain that warehouse workers experience as a job hazard.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

17859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 17859 Posts

@Serraph105 said:

So what do you guys think of this thing?

I wouldn't be able to resist the urge to kick one. Land a nice solid blow right on that counterweight. I bet it'd be funny to watch.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58299 Posts

I've always found the Boston Dynamics robots somewhat creepy, for some reason.

As cool as that is, I wonder why they went with a two-wheeled design that is inherently unsteady. Wouldn't something on four (or even three) be better and cheaper?

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

I've always found the Boston Dynamics robots somewhat creepy, for some reason.

As cool as that is, I wonder why they went with a two-wheeled design that is inherently unsteady. Wouldn't something on four (or even three) be better and cheaper?

Because this two wheel design looks effin rad. Am I right? :P

So... Goodbye to 50% of the warehouse workers Amazon has?

Avatar image for deactivated-5de67c4d9cb12
deactivated-5de67c4d9cb12

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 deactivated-5de67c4d9cb12
Member since 2019 • 392 Posts

I'm impressed, but I'd be more impressed if it knew enough to move the pallet closer.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

As someone who has worked in a warehouse as a picker, they're going to need to speed that thing up if they want it to compete with humans.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

@foxhound_fox said:

As someone who has worked in a warehouse as a picker, they're going to need to speed that thing up if they want it to compete with humans.

Benefit of not requiring breaks or limit to 8 hours shift will make up for that somewhat.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@horgen said:

Benefit of not requiring breaks or limit to 8 hours shift will make up for that somewhat.

Breaks? 8 hour shifts? What are those? Lol.

Not everywhere is a union shop.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

@foxhound_fox said:
@horgen said:

Benefit of not requiring breaks or limit to 8 hours shift will make up for that somewhat.

Breaks? 8 hour shifts? What are those? Lol.

Not everywhere is a union shop.

Oh I forgot. Places that doesn't allow slavery.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23031 Posts

@mrbojangles25 said:

I've always found the Boston Dynamics robots somewhat creepy, for some reason.

As cool as that is, I wonder why they went with a two-wheeled design that is inherently unsteady. Wouldn't something on four (or even three) be better and cheaper?

If I had to wager a guess, I'd propose range of motion. This design allows it to fairly easily reach the back of pallets while being overall smaller so that it can move between rows/pallets easier.

We're already using automated forklifts in some of our plants and warehouses for pallet movement. This type of multi-sku pallet building is the last leg of automating the vast bulk of grunt work in such locations. Pair this with a good WMS system that they've set up properly with a precise floor plan and sku locations (which most companies should already have as well as part of their ERP systems), and this thing can do a lot.

Avatar image for deactivated-63d1ad7651984
deactivated-63d1ad7651984

10057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#11 deactivated-63d1ad7651984
Member since 2017 • 10057 Posts

Good let the robots take the repetitive jobs I hope someday we get universal income work sucks unless it's a passion job.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

58299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 58299 Posts

@warmblur said:

Good let the robots take the repetitive jobs I hope someday we get universal income work sucks unless it's a passion job.

I'm not sure how it work in the Star Trek universe but isn't money nonexistent there? Or something like that.

I imagine a world where we just do our hobbies for work, or serve for the betterment of humanity.

*Ah found an article:

“You have Captain Picard saying, ‘We’ve overcome hunger and greed, and we’re no longer interested in the accumulation of things.'”

Courtesy of Wired

Basically, people who want to advance can do so, but more so due to advancing their talents and abilities. No longer does wealth or status play a role. I long for this kind of society.

Robots "liberate humankind" as the article says. I imagine a coal miner no longer has to mine coal, but also no longer has to worry about paying a mortgage (because housing is plentiful), or purchasing food (because food distribution has been perfected), and so forth. Instead, the once-miner-of-coal can now do what he wishes. He can go fishing with his son, attend college. His son can go to school without fear of having to go into the coal mines himself.

And this isn't communism where there's no incentive to better one's self, or some dystopian nightmare where we are all crammed into glass cube apartments. It's just that what people need and to a lesser extent want is so readily available that they don't have to struggle for it. They can focus on legitimately important things.

If someone never had to worry about paying rent, never had to worry about minding a budget so they could afford groceries, never had to worry about medical bills, and so on and so forth...they would be unstoppable. They could simply do what they felt needed to be done.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#13 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19543 Posts

@warmblur: You mean like the UBI that Andrew Yang is proposing?

Avatar image for deactivated-63d1ad7651984
deactivated-63d1ad7651984

10057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#14 deactivated-63d1ad7651984
Member since 2017 • 10057 Posts
@Jag85 said:

@warmblur: You mean like the UBI that Andrew Yang is proposing?

More or less yeah.